Va. Supreme Court: Insurer Not Liable For Claims From Global Warming

By | September 19, 2011

  • September 19, 2011 at 5:55 pm
    Barry Rabkin says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    So given the plaintiff’s argument… people who smoke cigarettes should know smoking will cause cancer and therefore no awards should be fund against tobacco companies (at least not since warning labels have been put on packs of cigarettes).

  • September 20, 2011 at 1:11 pm
    mike says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The decision by the court is absurd, especially as it appears it was made on the duty to defend.

  • September 21, 2011 at 11:14 am
    UCT says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    How is the decision of the court absurd? Let me guess, you are one of “those people” that believe we should allow frivolous lawsuits to clog our system and cost us all more money in the end?

    This lawsuit was a joke. Technically, exhaling is bad for the environment. Should we go ahead and bill every human on earth for breathing? lol What about those pesky cows tearing up our ozone with their noxious fumes? We could go on all day here. The next time I get a sunburn, I’m suing a Farmer!!



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*