Free Newsletters
Most Popular
- Montana Man Deliberately Crashes Into Insurance Office
- Parents Sue South Carolina Over Child's Sex Surgery
- 10 Things to Know About the Trucking Industry
- Obama Administration Releases Proposed Fracking Regulations
- Five Arrested In California Million-Dollar Mobile Phone Insurance Scam
- 10 Things to Know About the Trucking Industry
- 50 Top Apps for Independent Agents
- On a Leash: Dog Bite Insurance Claim Trends
- Montana Woman Charged With DUI After Drunken Horse Ride
- Three Insurance Companies Placed in Liquidation in Illinois
- The Goal: Zero Alcohol-Related Driving DeathsMay 15, 2013 | Comments (27)
- On a Leash: Dog Bite Insurance Claim TrendsMay 15, 2013 | Comments (23)
- House Farm Bill Expands Crop Insurance, Cuts Food StampsMay 16, 2013 | Comments (18)
- Sen. Warren Wants Details on ‘Too Big for Trial’ Bank SettlementsMay 15, 2013 | Comments (11)
- Montana Man Deliberately Crashes Into Insurance OfficeMay 17, 2013 | Comments (10)
Current Issue
Partner Center
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
Quote of Note
The Executive is not convinced that there is currently a persuasive argument to support the need for insurance for firearms in the home.
More QuotesChester McPherson, deputy commissioner of the D.C. Department of Insurance

BP Oil Spill Claims Chief Braces for Surge in Filings
N.Y. Regulator Issues ‘Cease and Desist’ Order to Car-Sharing Firm RelayRides
Tornadoes Spin Through Texas Towns After Dark, Killing Six
U.S., European Retailers Divided on Safety Plan for Bangladesh Factories
Government to Share Cyber Security Information with Private Sector
50 Top Apps for Independent Agents
Medical Liability Market Profitable But Deteriorating Results Expected: Fitch
Three Insurance Companies Placed in Liquidation in Illinois



Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
It has nothing to do with pedophilia in the church or for that matter even the birth control issue. It is a matter of “FREEDOM OF RELIGION” The federal government CANNOT mandate health coverage or issues concerning health if it is against your religion!
You state: “the average Catholic family in the U.S.A. average three children per household! Is the low birthrate due to “Divine Providence” or is there something else occurring here…like some form of birth control?”
——
What is your point? The Church does not now nor has it ever changed its teachings because of public opinion. By your logic, the fact that the majority of people in the world are not Catholic should be reason enough for the Church to close its doors and disband.
As to your assertion that this is just a “smokescreen” to distract from the “pedophilia issue”: no, it is not. To date, 75 priests have been convicted of child abuse in one form or another. There are just a hair under 39,500 active priests in the United States. Simple division will tell you that the number of substantiated allegations (read: those that end in conviction) number less than 2/10 of one percent.
A 2004 US Dept. of Education study authored by Hofstra professor Dr. Carol Shakeshaft estimated that nearly 9.5% of all public school students are targets of sexual misconduct from their teachers. The results of the study caused the author to later opine in 2006, “the physical sexual abuse of studetns in schools is likely more thna 100 times the abuse by priests.” The same 2004 report revealed that of the 225 cases of educator abuse in NY in 1994, all of the alleged perpetrators admitted to the abuse, but none was reported to the authorities. So, it seems that there is a child abuse issue in public schools, as well. To apply your logic, any time there is another issue facing the public school system, it must be a smokescreen to cover up the real problem!
If you are going to make this kind of argument, please be honest about it. You make yourself sound like a fool.
Aces, mate. I could not have said it better.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Wow. Didn’t take long for those who know nothing about the Catholic Church or the Catholic faith (or even the issue at hand) to add their two cents. The issue is whether the Federal Government can tell an entire faith community what they can or cannot believe, or can or cannot teach. It is unconstitutional, and it’s wrong. And the argument (that the Feds cannot dictate what a religion can teach) is invalidated by a non-sequitor (pedophiles!) is the same, tired, illogical and untrue argument you folks use to attack every time.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Jill, it doesn’t matter whether or not Catholics will stop using birth control. The protest is not really about contraception, it’s about whether or not a religious institution can be forced to violate its conscience.
The Catholic Church is leading the charge for all religious institutions and individuals. If religious institutions are forced to violate their consciences in this regard, what would stop the government from forcing them on another issue? The government has no business legislating the tenets of any religion, not just Catholicism.
Besides, the Church’s theology does not take public opinion into account.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
You are starting from the wrong premise, once again. We DON’T get “told what to do by the Feds” when it comes to the free practice of our religion. “We,” as in “me” and “you.” This is not a Catholic Church issue. This is a Constitutional law issue regarding the free practice one’s religion. As Catholics, we believe that birth control is an intrinsic evil that places a barrier between husband and wife, not just physically, but spiritually, as well. If we are not open to life, then we cannot be open to each other, nor can we be open to a faithful and loving relationship with God. Assuming you go to Mass every Sunday, you recite the Nicene Creed. If you don’t believe it, then why call yourself Catholic? It sounds like you need to go out and find another church. There are only about 30,000 of them out there, so you should be able to find one that is willing to compromise their teachings to accommodate your beliefs.