Connecticut’s Access Health CT Enrolled 86,000 Since October

By Susan Haigh | January 17, 2014

  • January 17, 2014 at 2:00 pm
    Captain Planet says:
    Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 4
    Thumb down 15

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    • January 17, 2014 at 2:32 pm
      Agent says:
      Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 16
      Thumb down 5

      Planet, you should hide your head in shame. Enrolling 48% in Medicaid is not a badge of honor and should not be a measuring stick for success of Obamacare. The numbers have been skewed once again and the true believers like you think this is actually working. I wonder how many Millenials were enrolled in CT from October to now.

    • January 17, 2014 at 2:55 pm
      Original Bob says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 12
      Thumb down 3

      I get it, voting to repeal is tax wasting because the ACA has now been declared cost effective by CT’s enrollment numbers. Sign up the medicaid qualified, the over 40s, the uninsurable and heavily subsidized people and we all live happily ever after because the overall enrollment projection for CT will be met.

    • January 17, 2014 at 3:09 pm
      Perplexed says:
      Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 14
      Thumb down 3

      Captain, you are a special kind of stupid. Didn’t you read the part about how many of those people enrolled are on the government teat?

      • January 17, 2014 at 4:53 pm
        Agent says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 11
        Thumb down 4

        Perplexed, we don’t call him Planet from another Planet for nothing. He is also a Progressive troll and makes many posts that defy any understanding. One of my favorites is “Snap”, ding,ding, ding when he agrees with his running mate Libby or Metric Ron.

  • January 17, 2014 at 11:46 pm
    Dabear666 says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 8
    Thumb down 2

    Since CT is a little over one percent of the US population and the overall goal was 7 million excl. Medicaid, wouldn’t the CT goal of 100k more likely have been excl. of Medicaid? Sounds like they set the goal with Medicaid excluded and now want to count the Medicaid sign-ups toward meeting the goal.

    Must the CT variation of jobs saved and created being the same as jobs created.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features