Midwest News
Detroit Considers Tough Restrictions for Pit Bulls
January 23, 2006
The Detroit City Council is hanging tough regarding ownership of Pit Bulls. A new ban and restrictions on this particular breed that would include mandatory sterilization of those dogs already living in Detroit and a ban on any new members of the breed are all part of a recent proposal being considered by the Council.
In addition to mandatory sterilization, the proposal would require a permit for Pit Bulls visiting the city and force any puppies older than 8 weeks to be removed from the city or killed. Current Pit Bull owners also would be required to purchase a license and $100,000 of liability insurance.
Insurance companies vary on coverage of certain breeds of dogs. Some have restrictions that must be met regarding how a dog is housed and handled before liability coverage can be sold. Certain companies have a list of what it considers to be the most dangerous breeds.
Bloomington, Illinois-based State Farm Insurance Company said it doesn't have a list of dangerous dogs. However it does ask two specific questions on its homeowner insurance application: Has the dog ever bitten anyone and has the pet has been trained as guard dog or for attack purposes?
Pit Bull owners say the fault is not with the dog or breed, but with owners who train the pet and that each pet should be looked individually.
Nevertheless, Denver, Miami, and Cincinnati have similar ordinances to the one being proposed in Detroit. Detroit's proposal is based on the Denver ordinance, considered one of the toughest in the nation, according to a Detroit Free Press story.
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article
| Subject |
Posted By |
Posted On |
| For the love of children |
Lover of All Breeds |
Feb 2, 2006, 9:01 pm |
| News: Detroit Won't Ban Pit Bulls |
Lover of All Breeds |
Feb 2, 2006, 6:10 pm |
| Pit Bulls |
Travis Cotton |
Feb 2, 2006, 5:41 pm |
| RE: Pit Bull |
Othello Orson |
Feb 2, 2006, 1:55 am |
| Pit Bull |
PitBull Owner |
Feb 1, 2006, 6:13 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Pit Bull |
Dog Lover |
Feb 1, 2006, 5:25 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Pit Bull |
Casson |
Feb 1, 2006, 4:23 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Pit Bull |
Casson |
Feb 1, 2006, 4:23 pm |
| Pit Bulls |
Nikkii |
Feb 1, 2006, 3:31 pm |
| RE: RE: Pit Bull |
PitBull Owner |
Feb 1, 2006, 12:58 pm |
| RE: RE: Pit Bull |
jeremy |
Jan 31, 2006, 9:42 am |
| RE: Pit Bulls |
heather |
Jan 31, 2006, 1:05 am |
| RE: Pit Bulls |
Sue |
Jan 26, 2006, 10:48 pm |
| Groomer |
Meaghan |
Jan 24, 2006, 2:12 pm |
| Be realistic people! |
fact facer |
Jan 24, 2006, 12:16 pm |
| RE: Pit Bull |
Othello Orson |
Jan 24, 2006, 2:23 am |
| Punish the guilty |
Lover of all breeds |
Jan 23, 2006, 4:20 pm |
| RE: Pit Bull |
jerry comegys |
Jan 23, 2006, 3:04 pm |
| RE: RE: Pit Bull |
susan |
Jan 23, 2006, 2:12 pm |
| RE: Pit Bull |
Lab Owner |
Jan 23, 2006, 1:40 pm |
| Pit Bulls |
Don Sharpe |
Jan 23, 2006, 1:32 pm |
| RE: Pit Bull |
Once Bitten, Twice Shy |
Jan 23, 2006, 1:15 pm |
| Bad dog |
Dog Lover |
Jan 23, 2006, 12:52 pm |
| Pit Bull |
dog owner |
Jan 23, 2006, 12:51 pm |
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article