Accused Wis. Arsonist Found Not Mentally Responsible

January 30, 2008

Separate emails using a comma.

A man who admitted setting fires that caused an estimated $500,000 damage has been found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect after a defense expert said he suffered from pyromania.

Bayfield County Circuit Judge John Anderson found that Hendrik-Jan “Hans” Veenendaal, 30, of Washburn, was not mentally responsible for the crimes.

The ruling came in a second phase of Veenendaal’s trial after the judge accepted a no contest plea by the defendant on three arson counts. As part of a plea agreement, 16 arson counts were dismissed but read into the record.

The fires were set in 2005 and 2006 and damaged hay bales, cars, boats, trucks, vacant houses and other structures.

In the sanity phase of the trial Friday, the prosecution called witnesses who said the defendant knew what he was doing was wrong and could have controlled his desire to start the fires.

But the judge said the facts of the case indicated otherwise, including the fact that so many fires were involved.

“Only a fool would say he didn’t have an interest in fire. This isn’t even close. He burned half the county,” Anderson said.

The judge revoked Veenendaal’s bond, put him in custody of the state Department of Health and Human Services, and scheduled a hearing Feb. 1 on his commitment to a state mental hospital.

He is being housed at Bayfield County Jail until that hearing.

Separate emails using a comma.
Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • January 31, 2008 at 5:24 am
    Maybe TX wants him? says:
    Maybe he should have gone to TX & set fire to a radio station instead?
  • January 30, 2008 at 5:29 am
    KLS says:
    =) It must be Rare Form Day at the IJ. I have been giggling nonstop since I started reading it today. The Guffaw Award definitely goes to "penal stretch". I don't know if that... read more
  • January 30, 2008 at 4:05 am
    Calif Ex Pat says:
    He plead nolo to three counts - so - he is "responsible' as a matter of Law and there well could be a penal stretch awaiting him when he is released from the Nut Hut. In Calif... read more
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features