Oklahoma Schools Destroyed by Tornado Lacked ‘Safe Rooms’
Connecticut Court Rules That Lawyers Can’t Be Sued for Fraud
Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
E&O Insights: Restaurant and Tavern Risks
CEA’s First CIO Reflects C-Suite Trend
Golf and Country Clubs Weather the Storm
Midwest AGs Go After Storm-Chasing Roofing CompaniesFree Newsletters
Sign up to receive insurance news alerts!Most Popular
Current Issue
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
While I understand that we have a modified no-fault, we pay medical bills indefinitely. The 3 years statement is misleading. And, we have some of the highest auto premiums in the country, especially when you factor in the MCCA fee. So, why have no-fault if the government is arbitrarily moving back to tort law? We really cannot have it both ways; lawsuits should be kept for the major cases of gross negligence and severe injury based on our extended medical benefits. Our state government really is showing their lack of understandg of how insurance works; they have been visably anti-insurance since the current leader (i.e., LAWYER) was elected.
What a travesty for Michigan consumers. Between the Supreme Court and the House of Reps, Michigan Consumers will be hurt. Insurance carriers will cease to write in Michigan, competition will become minimal, and rates will increase. Way to go Jenny, grease the skids so you and your plaintiff attorney buddies can make a buck. Politics sucks!