Illinois Supreme Court Strikes Down Malpractice Cap Law

February 4, 2010

Separate emails using a comma.

The Illinois Supreme Court Thursday declared unconstitutional a 2005 state law that capped damage awards for a plaintiff’s pain and suffering at $500,000 against doctors and $1 million against hospitals.

It was the second time in 13 years that the state’s highest court has struck down a state law capping damage awards.

The American Medical Association, the nation’s leading doctors’ group, criticized the decision.

“Today’s court decision threatens to undo all that Illinois patients and physicians have gained under the cap, including greater access to health care, lower medical liability rates and increased competition among medical liability insurers,” AMA President Dr. James Rohack said in a statement.

More than half the 50 states have enacted caps limiting noneconomic damages, commonly known as damages for pain and suffering, with ceilings ranging from $250,000 to $700,000, according to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

States that have enacted caps have generally seen malpractice insurance premiums stabilize or drop, the foundation said in a report this month. Some states have seen a drop in lawsuits and a rise in the number of practicing doctors, while others have not, the report said.

(Reporting by Andrew Stern, editing by Gerald E. McCormick)

Separate emails using a comma.
Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • February 5, 2010 at 4:10 am
    bob says:
    The AMA is the leading cause of the shortage of medical care. By limiting access to training and med schools, American doctors are guaranteed to become millionaires. Yet, on... read more
  • February 4, 2010 at 3:14 am
    Can you read says:
    Read the decision for yourself to see how they are unconstitutional. Il Constl says juries (i.e. the people) determine damages thru the legal process (i.e. the judicial branch... read more
  • February 4, 2010 at 2:14 am
    nobody important says:
    A government of the lawyers, by the lawyers and for the lawyers, to paraphrase a lawyer.
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features