Michigan Supreme Court Tosses Suit over Icy Slip-and-Fall

April 20, 2017

  • April 20, 2017 at 2:35 pm
    Jack Kanauph says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 10
    Thumb down 2

    Three Cheers for the Michigan Supreme Court!!!

    • April 20, 2017 at 2:37 pm
      Agent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 5
      Thumb down 5

      Almost as bad as the hot coffee claim with McDonalds.

      • April 20, 2017 at 3:30 pm
        Mr. Solvent says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 9
        Thumb down 1

        This just in, Michigan Supreme Court Rules Ice is Slippery.

      • April 25, 2017 at 9:46 am
        UW says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 3
        Thumb down 2

        You don’t know anything about that case. They awarded her 1 day’s worth of coffee revenue because McDonald’s was found to serve their coffee way too hot. They had paid off numerous claims for the same thing. It was so hot it could cause serious burns after being on a person’s skin for 2 seconds. Look up the pictures of her burns and say you think she was fleecing them, and that was a drink at a temperature you could put in your mouth and swallow.

        But of course you won’t do that, you will just keep saying the same ignorant BS, because it sounds like a dumb case, facts don’t matter, and you go on your gut without ever looking into anything.

    • April 20, 2017 at 3:32 pm
      Doug F says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 5
      Thumb down 1

      It’s a shame it even had to go to the MI Supreme Court, but, it’s a good sign that they threw it out. I wonder what would have happened if that happened in CA or MA. Thankfully, some courts are still reasonable.

      • April 21, 2017 at 2:47 pm
        FFA says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 3
        Thumb down 2

        Thats worth $1 mill in Chicago. Even more if she is not white.

        • April 21, 2017 at 5:12 pm
          mrbob says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 1
          Thumb down 0

          Don’t laugh I once had a broken ankle slip and fall in Chicago cost me policy limits of $1 Million.

          • April 25, 2017 at 5:19 pm
            FFA says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 0

            Not laughing.

  • April 20, 2017 at 3:42 pm
    Bill says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 3
    Thumb down 1

    Of course Bernstein was the only dissenter

  • April 20, 2017 at 7:45 pm
    Dan says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 1
    Thumb down 1

    What a surprise! Richard (ambulance chaser ) Bernstein was the lone dissenter.

  • April 24, 2017 at 9:48 am
    Chad Balaamaba says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 2
    Thumb down 1

    it is unusual for ice to form in Michigan with global warming, hence the claim went forward pursuing fair share for pain and suffering incurred due to camo ice forming in path. Ice not tolerated under new admin. Scary to see a court of supremes get one right…



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*