National News

Spitzer: Corporate Criminal Prosecution for Marsh Not Necessary Following Greenberg Resignation

New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer reacted to the decision at Marsh & McLennan Cos. to have CEO Jeffrey Greenberg step down. Greenberg was under fire to resign as Spitzer investigated reported bid-rigging at Marsh and a number of others in the industry.

Advertisement

"The actions announced today (Oct. 25) by the Board of Directors of Marsh & McLennan Companies permits Marsh and this office to move forward toward a civil resolution of our lawsuit," Spitzer commented in a release.

"We are persuaded that the goals that would have been advanced by a criminal prosecution of the corporation - punishment, restitution, general deterrence, and industry reform - will be better accomplished by criminal prosecution of individuals, adoption by the company of dramatically new business procedures, installation of new leadership, a full examination of prior wrongdoing and a pledge of restitution to those harmed.

"Realizing these goals, while also allowing Marsh & McLennan to retain a viable role in the marketplace, makes corporate criminal prosecution unnecessary."

Sponsored by Tapco Underwriters Inc.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: Spitzer's intent now seems less vengeful John
Oct 28, 2004, 8:07 pm
RE: Kerry, AIG and the big dig xsman17
Oct 28, 2004, 1:53 pm
RE: RE: Spitzer's intent now seems less vengeful
Oct 28, 2004, 1:38 pm
RE: Spitzer's self-aggrandizement Mike
Oct 28, 2004, 1:33 pm
RE: So you think this is a new development? Seasoned Underwriter
Oct 28, 2004, 9:09 am
RE: don't kid yourself not known
Oct 28, 2004, 7:47 am
don't kid yourself na
Oct 27, 2004, 2:31 pm
N.Y. A. G. out of his comfort zone Overload
Oct 27, 2004, 2:09 pm
Spitzer's self-aggrandizement Big Insurance
Oct 27, 2004, 1:43 pm
RE: RE: Spitzer's intent now seems less vengeful n/a
Oct 27, 2004, 1:42 pm
RE: RE: Spitzer's intent now seems less vengeful M
Oct 27, 2004, 1:35 pm
RE: Spitzer's intent now seems less vengeful NA
Oct 27, 2004, 1:34 pm
RE: Spitzer's intent now seems less vengeful
Oct 27, 2004, 1:29 pm
RE: Spitzer's intent now seems less vengeful Jim
Oct 27, 2004, 1:27 pm
Spitzer's intent now seems less vengeful Don't mention the name
Oct 27, 2004, 1:12 pm