A.M. Best Downgrades Ratings for AIG Subs; Ratings Stay Under Review

May 5, 2005

A.M. Best Co. has downgraded the Financial Strength Ratings (FSR) of most of American International Group Inc.’s (AIG) (New York) wholly-owned insurance subsidiaries to A+ (Superior) from A++ (Superior).

This action follows the company’s recent disclosure of the more complete findings from its extensive internal review. Further, its Issuer Credit Ratings (ICR) assigned to the operating companies on April 6, 2005 have been downgraded to “aa-” from “aa+”. The extent of the internal control issues disclosed in the report exceeded A.M. Best expectations, although the financial impact to shareholders’ equity was not.

The FSR and ICR ratings remain under review with negative implications. The under review status was placed on the financial strength ratings of these companies on March 15 following the company’s announcement that Maurice Greenberg stepped down as CEO and that the filing of AIG’s 2004 10K had been delayed.

The extent and number of accounting re-statements, as well as the disregard of accounting regulations and financial reporting to auditors, regulators and others made even more apparent in the current AIG report, are the direct causes of the downgrade.

Rating determinations have many components on both a qualitative and quantitative basis. The downgrade is not based on the absolute level of negative financial affect on shareholder’s equity, which A.M. Best understands and believes is manageable on a GAAP accounting basis given the still formidable financial strength of AIG. Rather, the action reflects the fact that the failure in internal controls, identified in AIG’s internal review, which will result in an adverse opinion by AIG’s auditors, is inconsistent with A.M. Best’s highest financial strength rating category.

While A.M. Best understands that the new management team is actively addressing the control issues and is instituting a new culture of heeding those controls, absolute faith in financial reporting, particularly on a statutory basis, cannot be assumed at the present time. Further, it may take time to re-establish the confidence of the group’s constituents.

The ratings will remain under review with negative implications until the filing of the financial statements occurs and A.M. Best has had an opportunity to more fully review various managerial, reputational, operational and financial issues.

The vulnerability to continued inquiries from regulators and possible related fines or penalties, several shareholder lawsuits, and potential changes in management at the operational level leaves AIG exposed to further financial and reputational risk at the present time.

As stated in A.M. Best’s report of April 6, 2005, the accounting issues are focused within AIG’s domestic property/casualty operating subsidiaries whose capital was not robust for their previous ratings. A.M. Best has yet to determine the extent of the statutory impact on capital of the accounting re-statements, which will need to be determined prior to the removal of the under review status.

Despite the downgrade, A.M. Best believes that AIG maintains one of the strongest and most unique insurance franchises in the industry, with a breadth of products, capacity, highly intelligent operational managers and ability to respond to market conditions remain intact.

Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • May 26, 2005 at 9:59 am
    I. Agent says:
    This type of corruption is prevelent throughout ALL American business & not just limited to the insurance industry. It's time we as consumer open our eyes and hit these compan... read more
  • May 9, 2005 at 5:36 am
    Anonymous says:
    I THOUGHT IT WAS COMMON KNOWLEDGE THAT BECAUSE COMPANIES PAY A.M. BEST FOR THEIR FINANCIAL REVIEWS, DOES ANYONE REALLY THINK YOU WOULD BITE THE HAND THAT FEEDS YOU? SORTA LI... read more
  • May 6, 2005 at 1:21 am
    skeptical says:
    AIG definately has some great people doing most of the work. But unfortunately, there are a lot of "yes" men and presidents etc controlling the subsidiariaries that really kn... read more
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features