Americans for Insurance Reform Report Says Med-Mal ‘Crisis’ is Over

March 1, 2006

Separate emails using a comma.

Americans for Insurance Reform (AIR) has released a new study confirming the wholesale decline of medical malpractice insurance rates nationwide.

The AIR study also indicates that this phenomenon is occurring whether or not states enacted restrictions on patients’ legal rights, such as “caps” on compensation. The medical malpractice insurance “crisis” is over, according to the study.

AIR’s study is based on the most recent Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers survey of market conditions, showing the average rate hike for doctors over the past six months has been 0 percent. This is following similar results for the last quarter of 2004, which saw rates rising only 3 percent at the end of that year. By comparison, rates jumped 63 percent during the same quarter of 2002.

According to Joanne Doroshow, AIR spokesperson and executive director of the Center for Justice & Democracy, “Consumer rights organizations have long maintained that the ‘crisis’ of skyrocketing insurance rates for doctors and other policyholders would end when the insurance investment cycle stabilized, and that this would occur whether or not so-called tort ‘reform’ laws were enacted. Insurance industry data now unmistakably confirms this prediction.”

“We are now witnessing the wholesale collapse of insurance rates, including medical malpractice rates,” said J. Robert Hunter, AIR spokesperson, director of Insurance for the Consumer Federation of America, former Federal Insurance Administrator and Texas Insurance Commissioner. “The end of the ‘hard market’ of sharp rate increases, less competition and cutbacks in coverage has occurred and a ‘soft market’ is now fully in place.

“The hard phase of the insurance cycle clobbers American businesses and professions every ten to fifteen years,” continued Hunter. “Although these hard markets last only about two to three years, they can no longer be tolerated. State regulators must enforce the rating laws in order to end the boom and bust swing from illegal overpricing, such as the rates some policyholders have been asked to pay today, to illegal and inadequate underpricing, which will be seen when the market softens too much later in the cycle.

“Fortunately, the hard market price jump is behind us and we are now entering the softer market so legislators have a decade or so to grapple with how best to do this before the next hard market hits the nation. And there is now clearly no need to rush into quick legislative fixes, such as legal limits on patients’ rights.”

For the full report, see http://insurance-reform.org.

Separate emails using a comma.
Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • March 2, 2006 at 10:31 am
    RHB says:
    Hunter once tried to be a regulator in Texas, if I\'m not mistaken. His service to Texas is quite forgetable. He claimed to be \"Federal\" regulator before then but I have nev... read more
  • March 2, 2006 at 9:20 am
    R.B. King says:
    Was there realy a crisis? Fact is in the Mid 1980\'s the prices for Med. Mal were close to where they are now. That was at investment income levels of 12% to 20% on approved i... read more
  • March 2, 2006 at 9:07 am
    cdw says:
    As a former regulator, Mr. Hunter knows better than to believe his own press. This is just a press release to start tainting the media airwaves ahead of Bill Frist\'s efforts... read more
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features