A federal judge said this week that his “door is open” to a mass settlement of disputed insurance claims in Mississippi after Hurricane Katrina, but he won’t endorse a proposed class-action settlement of roughly 35,000 claims for State Farm policyholders.
In January, State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. and lawyers for hundreds of policyholders announced a deal that called for State Farm to pay at least $50 million to policyholders who didn’t sue the company but could have their claims reopened.
In March, however, a team of lawyers led by Richard “Dickie” Scruggs withdrew their request for U.S. District Judge L.T. Senter Jr. to sign off on the agreement, citing a legal “stalemate” and the judge’s apparent reluctance to approve the settlement.
On Monday in Gulfport, Miss., Senter said he is willing to consider a new settlement proposal even though he is no longer being asked to approve January’s deal.
“The door is open to those negotiations as far as this Court is concerned,” he wrote. “I believe it is possible that good faith negotiations can lead to a breakthrough on the settlement of these claims.”
After Senter issued his three-page opinion Monday, Scruggs said in an interview that, “It’s quite disappointing that the federal courts have given no decisive or resolute guidelines to the parties to get these very pressing matters resolved.”
After Scruggs’ legal team withdrew their support for the proposed settlement, Mississippi Insurance Commissioner George Dale announced that his office reached a separate agreement with State Farm for the company to re-evaluate and possibly pay thousands of claims.
“We’ll continue to explore ways to put this string of litigation behind ourselves and our customers,” State Farm spokesman Phil Supple said Monday night.
Senter said his opinion shouldn’t be viewed as an endorsement of that agreement between Dale and State Farm. The judge noted that, unlike State Farm’s deal with Scruggs, Dale’s agreement with the insurer doesn’t require claims to be resolved through binding arbitration.
Senter said he hopes Dale’s deal with State Farm succeeds, but added, “I am uncertain whether the program adequately addresses all the concerns I have previously expressed.”
As part of January’s proposed settlement, Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood had agreed to drop State Farm from his lawsuit against several insurers for refusing to pay for more than $2 billion in damage from Katrina’s storm surge. Hood also agreed to drop a criminal probe of State Farm’s claims practices.
Hood had asked Senter to let him intervene in the matter so he could enforce his end of the agreement. Senter, however, said Hood’s request is now moot.
“I express no opinion on the merits of the controversy between State Farm and (Hood),” Senter wrote.
Senter said he will continue to seek a speedy way to resolve hundreds if not thousands of claims by homeowners on Mississippi’s Gulf Coast.
“Finding such a procedure promises to be in the best interests of State Farm and its policyholders, and I believe the quest for such a procedure is indeed worthwhile,” he wrote.
Melanie says: 
Call says: 
Miss Diasy says: 
Banks Still Face Legal Claims After $25 Billion Settlement
MF Global Judge to Examine Insurance Payments for Former Executives
Daredevil CEOs May Put Companies at Risk
California Independent Contractor Law May Be Liability for Agents, Brokers
North Carolina Continues Auto Regulation Debate As Rates Stay Same for 2012
Long-time California Lobbyist Looks to 2012 Legislation Affecting Insurance
Mine Safety Chief Seeks to End Complacency Over Safety
Virginia Court Grants Rehearing of Global Warming Claims Case
