Improper application of insurance terminology by some insurance news sources has created a wave of worry over an endorsement these media outlets assert severely limits the protection provided by the commercial general liability (CGL) policy . Readers are even warned that attachment of this endorsement is antithetical to the foundational principles of the CGL.
This “new” controversy centers on an endorsement actively used since the mid-to-late 1980′s: the Limitation of Coverage to Designated Operations (or similarly titled) endorsement. The true nature, purpose and use of this endorsement have been masked by previously published misinformation, bias and myth.
Click here to read the first in a two-part series about this supposed toxic limitation.


Banks Still Face Legal Claims After $25 Billion Settlement
MF Global Judge to Examine Insurance Payments for Former Executives
Daredevil CEOs May Put Companies at Risk
California Independent Contractor Law May Be Liability for Agents, Brokers
North Carolina Continues Auto Regulation Debate As Rates Stay Same for 2012
Long-time California Lobbyist Looks to 2012 Legislation Affecting Insurance
Mine Safety Chief Seeks to End Complacency Over Safety
Virginia Court Grants Rehearing of Global Warming Claims Case


