National News

U.S. Safety Group Calls for Cell Phone Driving Ban

Copyright Reuters

The National Safety Council, which campaigned to get U.S. states to enforce seatbelt laws, is taking on cellphones, saying it is starting a campaign to ban all use of mobile phones while driving.

Even so-called hands-free devices should be banned because studies show they do not make it any safer to talk on the telephone while driving, the group said.

"It's time to take the cellphone away," said Janet Froetscher, president and chief executive officer of the non-profit group.

"Studies show that driving while talking on a cellphone is extremely dangerous and puts drivers at a four times greater risk of a crash," Froetscher said in a telephone interview.

Many states and Washington, D.C. have laws requiring the use of a hands-free device while driving and using a cellphone. But several recent studies have shown drivers are far more distracted when speaking on a mobile phone, even with a speaker or headset, than talking to a live passenger.

Last month Dave Strayer of the University of Utah and colleagues demonstrated that drivers using a hands-free device drifted out of their lanes and missed exits more frequently than drivers talking to a passenger.

Strayer's team has also shown that drivers using mobile telephones are as impaired as drivers who are legally drunk.

A study from the Harvard Center of Risk Analysis estimates that cellphone use while driving contributes to 6 percent of crashes. Froetscher's group says that translates to 636,000 crashes, 330,000 injuries and 2,600 deaths in the United States each year.

"When you're on a call, even if both hands are on the wheel, your head is in the call, and not on your driving," Froetscher said. "Unlike the passenger sitting next to you, the person on the other end of the call is oblivious to your driving conditions. The passenger provides another pair of eyes on the road."

CALLING GOVERNORS

Froetscher said her group would call governors and state legislators and ask them to ban all use of cellphones while driving. She is confident the group can get states to change their laws.

"We have been through this before with seatbelts, with drunk driving. We do research. When the research demonstrates that something is very dangerous and we can save lives, we educate the public about it. We educate legislators about it," she said in a telephone interview.

John Ulczycki, a spokesman for the group, said it was behind the "Click it or Ticket" campaigns that have helped states enforce seatbelt laws.

Ulczycki said his group, which helps run court-ordered driver safety education courses, was also working with the wireless telephone industry. "Some people suggest and you might hear the argument that there might be a lot of things that are distracting in a vehicle and why are you picking on a cellphone?" he said.

He cited data from the International Association for the Wireless Telecommunications Industry that show there are 270 million wireless telephone subscribers in the United States, and more than 80 percent admit to using a cellphone while driving.

"There are over 100 million people engaged in this behavior," Ulczycki said.

"There may be other things that people do in their cars that are more dangerous than talking on cellphones. I think one of the most dangerous thing people do is turn around in their seats. But we don't have 100 million people doing that regularly for hours a day."

(Editing by Eric Walsh)

Copyright 2009 Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: missing the point Yorkie
Jan 20, 2009, 6:11 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: no one to talk to cheli
Jan 15, 2009, 2:16 pm
RE: RE: RE: I give up....... Rikky
Jan 15, 2009, 1:21 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Banning Dawn
Jan 15, 2009, 12:32 pm
RE: RE: RE: no one to talk to SFOInsuranceLady
Jan 15, 2009, 12:16 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Banning SFOInsuranceLady
Jan 15, 2009, 12:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Banning Dawn
Jan 15, 2009, 9:55 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Banning cheli
Jan 15, 2009, 9:53 am
RE: RE: RE: Banning nobody important
Jan 15, 2009, 9:29 am
RE: RE: Banning cheli
Jan 15, 2009, 9:19 am
RE: Banning Bill
Jan 15, 2009, 9:15 am
RE: RE: no one to talk to cheli
Jan 15, 2009, 8:58 am
RE: RE: RE: I give up....... Dawn
Jan 15, 2009, 7:57 am
RE: RE: I give up....... SFOInsuranceLady
Jan 15, 2009, 1:53 am
RE: no one to talk to SFOInsuranceLady
Jan 15, 2009, 1:45 am
no one to talk to cheli
Jan 14, 2009, 4:15 pm
RE: RE: I give up....... cheli
Jan 14, 2009, 4:12 pm
RE: I give up....... Rikky
Jan 14, 2009, 4:08 pm
I give up....... SFOInsuranceLady
Jan 14, 2009, 3:54 pm
RE: Location, Location, Location nobody important
Jan 14, 2009, 2:27 pm
RE: Loud Noises emanating from our vehicle Rikky
Jan 14, 2009, 2:22 pm
Location, Location, Location Mr. Obvious
Jan 14, 2009, 1:20 pm
RE: Loud Noises emanating from our vehicle wudchuck
Jan 14, 2009, 12:53 pm
Loud Noises emanating from our vehicle Dog Luvver
Jan 14, 2009, 11:46 am
enforcement wudchuck
Jan 14, 2009, 10:14 am
RE: ban - I say NOT! nobody important
Jan 14, 2009, 10:03 am
RE: RE: RE: How about taking on the Credit Card Companies? cheli
Jan 14, 2009, 9:24 am
RE: RE: ban - I say NOT! cheli
Jan 14, 2009, 9:16 am
RE: RE: RE: So What brainfreeze
Jan 14, 2009, 3:59 am
The things you see on- the- road..... Boner
Jan 13, 2009, 5:37 pm
RE: RE: ban - I say NOT! Oli Gark
Jan 13, 2009, 4:59 pm
RE: RE: How about taking on the Credit Card Companies? Yucca Dew
Jan 13, 2009, 4:50 pm
RE: KKMSO matt
Jan 13, 2009, 4:22 pm
RE: ban - I say NOT! Ohioan
Jan 13, 2009, 4:16 pm
ban - I say NOT! wudchuck
Jan 13, 2009, 3:55 pm
RE: What's wrong with it? cheli
Jan 13, 2009, 3:50 pm
What's wrong with it? Rikky
Jan 13, 2009, 3:47 pm
RE: How about taking on the Credit Card Companies? cheli
Jan 13, 2009, 3:46 pm
RE: This is a ridiculous law with good intentions Lame Crane
Jan 13, 2009, 3:43 pm
RE: Police do it SFOInsueranceLady
Jan 13, 2009, 3:35 pm
Police do it Ohioan
Jan 13, 2009, 3:33 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What nobody important
Jan 13, 2009, 3:28 pm
This is a ridiculous law with good intentions Dawn
Jan 13, 2009, 3:25 pm
How about taking on the Credit Card Companies? Lame Brain
Jan 13, 2009, 3:23 pm
RE: RE: RE: What was that American thing called again, oh ye TJ
Jan 13, 2009, 3:16 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Insurance Dude
Jan 13, 2009, 3:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So W Joey
Jan 13, 2009, 3:02 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What cheli
Jan 13, 2009, 2:56 pm
RE: Thanks Cheli and SFOInsurance Lady cheli
Jan 13, 2009, 2:55 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What phoner
Jan 13, 2009, 2:53 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What cheli
Jan 13, 2009, 2:50 pm
Thanks Cheli and SFOInsurance Lady Hmmmm....
Jan 13, 2009, 2:49 pm
So What Mike
Jan 13, 2009, 2:46 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What cheli
Jan 13, 2009, 2:45 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What cheli
Jan 13, 2009, 2:42 pm
RE: Blooth Tooth Doesnt help Much cheli
Jan 13, 2009, 2:40 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What SFOInsurancelady
Jan 13, 2009, 2:40 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What SFOInsurancelady
Jan 13, 2009, 2:40 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What SFOInsurancelady
Jan 13, 2009, 2:40 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What Joey
Jan 13, 2009, 2:39 pm
RE: Blooth Tooth Doesnt help Much Doug
Jan 13, 2009, 2:36 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What SFOInsuranceLady
Jan 13, 2009, 2:34 pm
Blooth Tooth Doesnt help Much Mike
Jan 13, 2009, 2:34 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What SFOInsuranceLady
Jan 13, 2009, 2:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What cheli
Jan 13, 2009, 2:05 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What Joey
Jan 13, 2009, 1:57 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What cheli
Jan 13, 2009, 1:50 pm
Cell Phone ban Pat
Jan 13, 2009, 1:50 pm
Cell Phone ban Pat
Jan 13, 2009, 1:50 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What Amazed
Jan 13, 2009, 1:41 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What cheli
Jan 13, 2009, 1:35 pm
RE: RE: RE: What was that American thing called again, oh ye nobody important
Jan 13, 2009, 1:35 pm
RE: What was that American thing called again, oh yea, FREED Franz
Jan 13, 2009, 1:34 pm
RE: RE: What was that American thing called again, oh yea, F Amazed
Jan 13, 2009, 1:31 pm
RE: So What Hmmmm....
Jan 13, 2009, 1:29 pm
RE: What was that American thing called again, oh yea, FREED glenf
Jan 13, 2009, 1:25 pm
studies Devil's Advocate
Jan 13, 2009, 1:11 pm
What was that American thing called again, oh yea, FREEDOM Tommy Payne
Jan 13, 2009, 1:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: So What Dawn
Jan 13, 2009, 1:06 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: So What nobody important
Jan 13, 2009, 12:57 pm
RE: RE: RE: So What Safety Guy
Jan 13, 2009, 12:51 pm
RE: RE: Banning The Jerk
Jan 13, 2009, 12:48 pm
Seat Belts & Phones JERRY ANDERSON
Jan 13, 2009, 12:46 pm
Really? The Jerk
Jan 13, 2009, 12:46 pm
RE: Banning KKSMO
Jan 13, 2009, 12:40 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: So What The other side
Jan 13, 2009, 12:33 pm
RE: RE: RE: So What glenf
Jan 13, 2009, 12:31 pm
Banning The other side
Jan 13, 2009, 12:31 pm
RE: RE: So What Dawn
Jan 13, 2009, 12:27 pm
Bravo---Ban the phones while driving Wayne
Jan 13, 2009, 12:22 pm
RE: RE: So What caveat emptor
Jan 13, 2009, 11:16 am
RE: So What Stat Guy
Jan 13, 2009, 10:46 am
RE: RE: So What Bluelouboyle
Jan 13, 2009, 9:58 am
RE: So What Ratemaker
Jan 13, 2009, 9:26 am
RE: RE: So What abouttobecrucifiedforthis
Jan 13, 2009, 8:59 am
RE: So What matt
Jan 13, 2009, 8:44 am
So What nobody important
Jan 13, 2009, 8:16 am