AIG Bailout Good For Goldman Sachs, Other Banks But Not For Investors

By | March 11, 2009

  • March 11, 2009 at 8:12 am
    Tool Shed says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I am not the sharpest financial mind in the tool shed, but doesn’t Citigroup own a prosperous insurance company too? Why aren’t they being pressure to sell the lucrative assets of Travelers?

  • March 11, 2009 at 8:18 am
    Bill Rempel says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Well, DUH! Bailing out AIG has NEVER been about the equity, the company, or the shareholders.

    It has ALWAYS been about the BONDHOLDERS and the COUNTERPARTIES.

    As of 12/31/07, when AIG was still trading at $50-ish, they had $163 BILLION in long-term debt. And that’s just what was ON the balance sheet. God knows what’s off of it, and what they owe the counterparties.

  • March 11, 2009 at 9:31 am
    matt says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    SURPRISE

    (that’s SURPRISE in the most sarcastic tone possible)

  • March 11, 2009 at 10:23 am
    AE says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Acutally Travelers split from CitiGroup sometime around 2001 or so. They are completely free and clear of this mess.

  • March 11, 2009 at 11:33 am
    jojo says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    guess all those wharton school MBA
    a and ivy league pricks arent so smart after all…

  • March 11, 2009 at 12:52 pm
    H Simpson says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Ah Dud again! Most of bailout going to Obama buddies. Payback for helping him get elected and future polical capital. Wellcome to the most corupt adminstration in history except maybe the Clintons.

  • March 11, 2009 at 12:52 pm
    Temblor says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    AIG must still meet it’s insurance obligations.

  • March 11, 2009 at 12:52 pm
    Iggy Pop & the Stooges says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    “Treasury is providing a massive wealth transfer from taxpayers to Goldman Sachs and other parties and it’s something that absolutely should be investigated,” Investigated??!! How about everyone who engineered this getting thrown into prison? But don’t hold your breath waiting for this “investigation.” Power never investigates itself (I must admit I stole that line from George Carlin). Anyone want to do some tar & feathering?

    “Whenever you find yourself in agreement with the majority, it’s time to pause and reflect.” Mark Twain

  • March 11, 2009 at 12:55 pm
    Bob says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    And Citi borrowed Traveler’s Umbrella and wouldn’t give it back when they parted – hence the confusion.

  • March 11, 2009 at 12:56 pm
    You forgot says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    You forgot to mention the Bush Administration my little sore looser.

  • March 11, 2009 at 1:09 am
    H Simpson says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    You Forgot, Bush is no longer in power. Obama is and we are all loosers now.

  • March 11, 2009 at 1:23 am
    MD Musketeer says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Wonder how much AIG stock Goldman had and when they started unloading. Probably 10 minutes after they left the Treasury meeting.

    But the idiots at the SEC would have to investigate, and as said at their testimony before Congress the SEC management and Compliance folks are “useless”.

  • March 11, 2009 at 1:24 am
    David says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Where are your facts on corruption charges genius? Former Treasury Secretary Paulson (Ex CEO of Goldman!) put that deal together in the Fall. Why do you think the initial bailout aranged by Paulson (ex CEO of Goldman!) was “not subject to reveiw”? The most corrupt administration in history left office in January.

  • March 11, 2009 at 1:54 am
    Mad As Hell says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I was woundering how long it would take the dumb asses on the hill to figure this one out.
    Both these crooks should be sent to the pen along with their counter parts at Goldmans.
    I was saying this back before the bailout that the money was funneled to Paulson’s old employer and that was why they were in the meeting.
    I wonder what the payoff was or will be ???
    Thank god someone is finally willing to put something in print about it.
    Here is an idea force a liqudation of both AIG & Goldman get our stolen tax money back.
    Also don’t keep saying it’s to big to fail mabey it’s to big to survive.

  • March 11, 2009 at 2:22 am
    duh says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Why do you think they were in such a rush to pass the bailout in the first place? Think about it. The majority of the bailout funds aren’t going to be utitilized until 2010 and beyond. That being the case, why was it SOOOO urgent that they pass the bailout so quickly….in particular before anyone actually had time to read the 1000+ pgs of bs and pork

  • March 11, 2009 at 2:43 am
    David says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    It all starts with Paulson. We can’t pin this one on Bush. He was such a dumb a** he never knew what was happening most of the time anyway. But, will Henry P. really have to answer for anything? I doubt it.

  • March 11, 2009 at 3:08 am
    duh says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    See, I don’t believe bush was as ignorant as people think. (don’t get me wrong, i am NOT a bush supporter) He was however, smart enough to throw out a bunch of lifelines just before he left, knowing full well that it would hold these companies over until he was out of office, making it Obama’s problem.

  • March 11, 2009 at 4:00 am
    David says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I said is a dumb a**. You are saying that he is evil. Could be that he is an evil dumba**.

  • March 11, 2009 at 4:19 am
    Lisa says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Its really our problem now.

    I’m also thinking back to who held out on the passing of the bailout…

  • March 12, 2009 at 9:21 am
    Iggy says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    indeed they are. Survival of the fittest. Let free competition reign.

  • March 18, 2009 at 10:09 am
    Bill says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Why do you think that AIG was chosen to recieve the 170 Billion. It is because it was the cleanest way to give European Governments and Banks the bailout. Who would have stood for us giving foreign governments and Banks this kind of a bailout. Tax payers are such saps. Get mad, Get angry. Join a tax tea party this 4/15/09.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*