National News

15 AIG Employees Give Back Bonuses

Copyright Reuters

Fifteen of 20 American International Group leading bonus recipients have agreed to give them back in full, said New York's top legal officer who is probing into $165 million in executive pay at the troubled company bailed out by the U.S. government.

New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo told reporters on a conference call on Monday that he hopes to recoup $80 million of bonus payments made to Americans, or about half of the $165 million paid by the giant insurer on March 15.

An AIG spokeswoman said late Monday a "handful" of senior executives have resigned from its Financial Products unit, which Cuomo blamed last week for bringing the insurer to the brink of collapse. It was unclear if any of the executives with the top bonuses had resigned.

Advertisement

The spokeswoman declined to specify the number of resignations, noting they were "manageable," and said there were indications that more will follow.

Cuomo, who has pressed AIG and other banks and companies over the hot button issue of bonuses, said that so far he calculated that $50 million had been paid back by employees of the AIG Financial Products unit.

"A number of them (employees) have risen to the occasion and I applaud them," said Cuomo, whose office is looking into whether AIG and others broke securities laws by not fully disclosing information about the award of bonuses to executives for 2008.

Nine of the 10 executives who received top bonuses have agreed to return them, Cuomo said. He said about $80 million was paid to Americans, the rest outside of U.S. jurisdiction.

Cuomo has said he wanted to make public the names and details of bonus recipients, but he was assessing security and privacy of individuals following death threats against some employees.

"Our legal theory is fraudulent conveyance, and we think it is a powerful legal theory," Cuomo told reporters. "But if a person returns the money I don't it is in the public interest to name them."

He added that those people will see their name disappear from his list permanently.

AIG said in a statement that it was reviewing responses of other employees in the Financial Products division.

"We are deeply gratified that a vast majority of FP's senior leadership have expressed a willingness to forsake their recent retention payments," the statement said.

(Reporting by Grant McCool and Lilla Zuill; editing by Richard Chang)

Copyright 2009 Reuters. Click for Restrictions.
Sponsored by Tapco Underwriters Inc.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: Who's the holdout? Dave
Mar 30, 2009, 9:47 am
RE: Anybody see this? Patti
Mar 25, 2009, 2:36 pm
RE: RE: Success Patti
Mar 25, 2009, 2:31 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Anybody see this? Disgusted
Mar 25, 2009, 1:29 pm
"Fed" Up AZAZ
Mar 25, 2009, 12:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Anybody see this? MM
Mar 25, 2009, 12:12 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Anybody see this? MAY BE CANCELED
Mar 25, 2009, 11:58 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Anybody see this? Mike
Mar 25, 2009, 11:55 am
RE: RE: RE: Anybody see this? Joe Mama
Mar 25, 2009, 11:49 am
RE: RE: Anybody see this? Young Broker From PA
Mar 25, 2009, 10:51 am
RE: Anybody see this? MM
Mar 25, 2009, 10:50 am
RE: Anybody see this? Justamom
Mar 25, 2009, 10:47 am
RE: Anybody see this? THEY ARE OVERPAID Mike
Mar 25, 2009, 10:46 am
Anybody see this? Joe Mama
Mar 25, 2009, 10:12 am
RE: Who's the holdout? TAR
Mar 25, 2009, 8:28 am
RE: RE: Jen you are right, but Greyboomer
Mar 24, 2009, 7:02 pm
RE: Jen you are right, but mm
Mar 24, 2009, 4:51 pm
Jen you are right, but UW
Mar 24, 2009, 4:41 pm
RE: Wazzup Blog? WAZZUP
Mar 24, 2009, 4:37 pm
RE: Wazzup Blog? Jen
Mar 24, 2009, 3:57 pm
What About Europe? Dread
Mar 24, 2009, 3:19 pm
Wazzup Blog? Mike
Mar 24, 2009, 3:16 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: You meant retention rather than WAZZUP
Mar 24, 2009, 3:03 pm
RE: Re Get the holdouts Disgusted
Mar 24, 2009, 3:01 pm
Re Get the holdouts Joe in NH
Mar 24, 2009, 2:55 pm
How to get the "hold-out 5" to surrender........ TIM
Mar 24, 2009, 2:20 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: You meant retention rather than Underryder
Mar 24, 2009, 1:44 pm
Does anyone really listen or investigate Voice not herd
Mar 24, 2009, 1:42 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: You meant retention rather than ince E.Hutton
Mar 24, 2009, 1:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: You meant retention rather than ince Jen
Mar 24, 2009, 1:22 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: You meant retention rather than incentiv Disgusted
Mar 24, 2009, 1:17 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: You meant retention rather than incentiv AGENCY PRINCIPLE
Mar 24, 2009, 1:15 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: You meant retention rather than incentive... Jen
Mar 24, 2009, 1:10 pm
RE: RE: RE: You meant retention rather than incentive... Disgusted
Mar 24, 2009, 1:05 pm
You meant retention rather than incentive... Fair
Mar 24, 2009, 1:01 pm
RE: RE: You meant retention rather than incentive... RM
Mar 24, 2009, 12:57 pm
RE: RE: You meant retention rather than incentive... Jen
Mar 24, 2009, 12:51 pm
RE: You meant retention rather than incentive... Jen
Mar 24, 2009, 12:48 pm
You meant retention rather than incentive... Proofreader
Mar 24, 2009, 12:43 pm
RE: Success Jen
Mar 24, 2009, 12:40 pm
Success RM
Mar 24, 2009, 12:37 pm
RE: Who's the holdout? FedUpWithPolitics
Mar 24, 2009, 12:32 pm
Blackmail MM
Mar 24, 2009, 12:30 pm
Who's the holdout? Oh My!
Mar 24, 2009, 11:04 am