Oklahoma Schools Destroyed by Tornado Lacked ‘Safe Rooms’
Connecticut Court Rules That Lawyers Can’t Be Sued for Fraud
Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
E&O Insights: Restaurant and Tavern Risks
CEA’s First CIO Reflects C-Suite Trend
Golf and Country Clubs Weather the Storm
Midwest AGs Go After Storm-Chasing Roofing CompaniesFree Newsletters
Sign up to receive insurance news alerts!Most Popular
Current Issue
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
I will be anxiously awaiting
Has anyone ever compared the actual events to his predicted events?
Yes, they have. He is ALWAYS right on target; although they do update the forecast from time to time to match what is acturally happening.
And it was not all that long ago, they started naming tropical storms because they were off by so much.
it took 20 years for them to figure out that an estimate in december is just a guess…GENIUS!
“Klotzbach says they’ve tried various models but none have been successful in estimating the number of storms that early”
So they acknowledge that for 20 years they haven’t been able to get it right, but it didn’t stop that money from coming in year after year.
It took twenty years for this “scholar” to admit that his predictions are guesswork. In the meantime how many thousand insureds lost coverage and were non renewed because the Carriers and reinsurers believed him.
The posters here have said it well. I have always found the CSU forecasters to be as accurate as any weatherman. Only profession I know where you can be wrong more than 50% of the time, wind up with positive face time on tv, giving speeches, and getting nice pay increases.