Supreme Court Considers Travelers Insurance Case on Limiting Class Actions

By | January 7, 2013

  • January 9, 2013 at 3:36 pm
    DougJ says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    You just gotta love the plaintiffs lawyers!! Just looking for $$$$$ in thin air!

  • February 4, 2013 at 10:40 pm
    A Clay says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Travelers would try to control everything; the have so many judges on their side in a number of jurisdictions and when a venue has jurist who come into courts without prejudice, uninitiated by the high paid legal counsel of Travelers; and when they don’t get their way they spend spend spend. Don’t forget published on here 6 moths ago Travelers in California, via mail fraud, put 256 small businesses out of business with over billing and falsified audits. Don’t forget how all the major Work comp providers, Travelers esp, were found guilty of racketeering in Sandwich Chef of Texas v. Reliance Nat. Indem., 319 F.3d 205 (5th Cir., 2003) never purged themselves of this crime. That this year across the board, they moved to each state for a 50% increase irrespective of the economy and based upon knowingly paying fraudulent claims then reducing the payout to mislead states and Chamber of Commerce. Now they find a jurisdiction they can’t control and get their way is the the pot calling the kettle black, PPUUULLLEZZZ And the Supreme Ct heard this garbage.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*