Catholic Bishops Reject Obama Compromise on Contraception Coverage

By David Morgan | February 8, 2013

  • February 8, 2013 at 11:55 am
    ExciteBiker says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 88
    Thumb down 21

    In other news, despite a desparate fight by church officials, documents from the Los Angeles diocese were made public. The content of these documents sickens the stomach. And in other news, the Irish church was revealed to have benefitted from a widespread use of the unpaid labor of young women up through the mid 1990s. Perhaps this would be a good time to review the Vatican Bank; notably just last month the Bank of Italy stated that ‘the Vatican does not respect international anti money laundering norms and an Italian-registered bank can therefore not operate on its territory.’

    I guess what I am getting at is, quite frankly, the Catholic Bishops don’t have a grain of moral sand to stand on, and they had best keep their “holiest” of traps shut before the moral legitimacy of the Church is further laid bare in a way that even more parishioners will be unable to ignore.

    Faith in the legitimacy of the Catholic Church’s moral authority likely mirrors Congressional approval ratings.

    • February 8, 2013 at 3:53 pm
      Cheetoh Mulligan says:
      Hot debate. What do you think?
      Thumb up 15
      Thumb down 16

      Great comment. Paint a whole group with one brush. Using your way of thinking, all mothers should have their children taken away because they may kill them like Susan Smith and Casey Anthony did. All Germans should be locked up because of Hitler. Let’s condemm a whole race based on the actions of a few! Genius!

    • February 11, 2013 at 6:26 pm
      Don't Call Me Shirley says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      Hey ExciteBiker. Are there any good websites that provide this sort of information? I’ll bet there’s a lot of it out there, and I doubt anything could surprise me anymore.

    • February 13, 2013 at 3:07 pm
      Patti Cake in the East says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 3
      Thumb down 1

      Don’t tell me, ExciteBiker…let me guess. You’re a Scientologist? Unitarian Universalist?

  • February 8, 2013 at 1:43 pm
    insurance is fun! says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 79
    Thumb down 18

    When will churches and the religious right understand that they no longer have as much relevance in modern society on every possible issue as they used to? Separation – and all that. I am glad there are churches to maintain the moral discussions, but their word is simply just not law.

    Some of us actually believe that celebrating sex and using contraception are both morally fine.

    I am happy that both the church and the government are being removed from my bedroom.

  • February 8, 2013 at 1:43 pm
    Alan says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 65
    Thumb down 17

    How about this; no exceptions, no exemptions and we are eliminating your tax free status.

    • February 8, 2013 at 3:47 pm
      Cheetoh Mulligan says:
      Hot debate. What do you think?
      Thumb up 11
      Thumb down 16

      That’s a great idea. Screw Freedom! Let’s throw out Obama and get a Dictator!

      • February 11, 2013 at 9:51 am
        Jon says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 7
        Thumb down 1

        And your comment has exactly what to do with the subject at hand? Please try to be at least remotely connected to the topic…

      • February 13, 2013 at 3:14 pm
        Patti Cake in the East says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 1
        Thumb down 1

        Well, Cheetoh…I was with you up to the ‘Let’s throw Obama out’ part…

    • February 11, 2013 at 6:07 pm
      Don't Call Me Shirley says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 3
      Thumb down 1

      I’d vote for that!

      That is in no way a afront to freedom, by the way. It would only put a stop to these groups getting special priveleges. On the other hand, maybe we could start a new religion that says it’s a mortal sin to pay for anything at all ;)

      • February 11, 2013 at 6:10 pm
        Don't Call Me Shirley says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 0
        Thumb down 0

        I meant it’s in no way an affront. Poor typing skills.

  • February 8, 2013 at 2:46 pm
    Mike says:
    Hot debate. What do you think?
    Thumb up 17
    Thumb down 8

    Health care benefits are earned by the employee and are legally regulated by the government to guarantee a minimum standard for health insurance plans for all of us. Furthermore, no one is holding a gun to anyone’s head making them take the contraception benefit-no one. It is up to the individual employee to take the benefit. All obedient Catholics will not use the benefit, plain and simple (which a high percentage of Catholics in the US do today by the way). There is no restraining of religious freedom here, none whatsoever. Therefore, the discussion here is completely a political one.

  • February 8, 2013 at 2:51 pm
    Rusty says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 12
    Thumb down 1

    While on the topic, as long as everyone has to be treated equally these days, what about male contraception? That might be even more of a healthcare issue since, unlike most female contraceptives, condoms also protect against STDs. So, shouldn’t healthcare also pay for condoms?

  • February 8, 2013 at 3:59 pm
    BS says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 20
    Thumb down 3

    “The government would require all employees in our ‘accommodated’ ministries to have the illicit coverage – they may not opt out, nor even opt out for their children,” he said.”

    What a stupid argument. They don’t have to ‘opt out’ of it. They can just choose not to use that part of the coverage.

    And there are non-Catholics working in Catholic Hospitals and Universities. They should not be subject to the Church’s antiquated views on contraception and reproduction.

  • February 8, 2013 at 4:30 pm
    FFA says:
    Hot debate. What do you think?
    Thumb up 11
    Thumb down 20

    Obama started this. Women were not even asking for free Birth Controll.
    Seniors were asking for help. Did not get it. This whole thing was just a ploy to get the female vote.
    At the end of it all, Preventing Life is more important then preserving life to OBama.
    OBama has divided the masses for something that wasnt even asked for by anyone.
    So, add up all the time, effort & expense & percieved hard feelings men vs women to get this piece of legislation through. I personally do feel the efforts would have been better spent on somethign else that was a concern to the people of the USA. Maybe lowering the debt? Resolving Budget Issues?
    Instead, he wanted votes. He got them. And now, he is dividing the country amongst religous lines. Divide and Conquor! what an egomaniac!

    • February 8, 2013 at 4:34 pm
      insurance is fun! says:
      Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 17
      Thumb down 4

      Women pushing for equality and their rights started under the Obama presidency. FFA, you’re amazing!

      • February 9, 2013 at 10:59 am
        FFA says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 6
        Thumb down 3

        I didnt mean to imply that. I should have said renewed it. He did it for votes. And now the cost to get it pushed through with all the court battles??? Limited resources are better spent elsewhere.

        My only point is that women didnt ask for it. From the other forums, seems to me like women were happy with the way it was. They wernt asking for this. Seniors have been asking for help with RX forever. No help for those that need it the most.

        Can you think of one woman that said she wanted her BC free? Just one? Had he given up free meds to SR’s, I might have voted for him.

        On an unrelated note, Jesse JR headed to jail. Imaging that, another ILL politician headed to prison. Soon to follow, Sandy Jackson for the same reason – Campaign Fund Fraud.

      • February 11, 2013 at 6:18 pm
        Don't Call Me Shirley says:
        Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 35
        Thumb down 3

        But how am I gonna keep my woman barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen if she starts gettin’ them fancy liberal ideas about birth control?

        • February 12, 2013 at 2:45 pm
          Bob says:
          Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 2
          Thumb down 12

          Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

      • February 12, 2013 at 1:00 pm
        Bob says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 4
        Thumb down 12

        How is getting their birth control paid for equality?

        As A side comment: There is NO issue with equality as the law is written to do with women.

        Some, very few, people discriminate. It is the minority. If it were not, we would see much more lawsuits.

        Now on to what FFA was pointing out: Obama is forcing the appearance that there is a war against women, in order to unite women against republicans, on something that has false pretenses.

        Women should pay for their own birth control. While we are on fairness, where are my free condoms as part of an insurance plan?

        You know why we don’t do that? LOW COST MEDS HAVE NO PLACE ON INSURANCE.

        Everyone knows this in insurance except for you apparently. It just raises the costs for everyone. Obama is wrong. Plain and simple. He’s most wrong on this for trying to ignite a religious war.

        And for the rest of you: You are dead wrong on your views of the church, and YOU are being bigoted in your posts, discriminatory, and need to shut the hell up.

        Talking to Shirley, Jon, and Excite, who seems to think Irish Catholics have access to Roman Catholic funds. Here’s a hint: They don’t. Irish Catholics are not a part of the Roman Catholic church. Idiot.

        • February 12, 2013 at 1:41 pm
          jw says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 2
          Thumb down 2

          I’m having another blonde moment. How do low cost meds raise costs for everyone? Walmart has generics for $4. Most insurances have copays ranging from $3 to $25. How is this bad.

          • February 12, 2013 at 2:42 pm
            Bob says:
            Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 2
            Thumb down 17

            Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

          • February 12, 2013 at 2:43 pm
            Bob says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 8

            I should note the below equation follows exactly the 20% ratio that the government now restricts. So those numbers would actually be spot on.

            They would get $2,000 which is 20%, 80% would go toward claims.

  • February 8, 2013 at 5:17 pm
    Lisa Lincoln says:
    Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 4
    Thumb down 22

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    • February 11, 2013 at 1:35 pm
      jw says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 5
      Thumb down 0

      A truly conservative christian will oppose birth control in any form. The Catholic Church is adamant about not supplying birth control.

  • February 9, 2013 at 4:04 pm
    Jeff says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 7
    Thumb down 6

    This headline – “Catholic Bishops Reject Obama Compromise…” is simply not accurate. It assumes that the Obama Administration actually changed or moved its position towards the Bishops position – it clearly did not as seen by clear & forceful reaction of the Bishops. It makes it appear that Administration actually gave something up when it obviously had no intention of doing so. A more accurate headline would have been “Catholic Bishops Reject Latest Obama Wording….”

  • February 11, 2013 at 10:11 am
    Jon says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 26
    Thumb down 7

    It’s so absolutely simple I’m surprised the Catholic Church (and hey, let’s toss in Hobby Lobby as well) cannot understand it.

    In this country, you cannot engage in employee discrimination based on religious belief.

    That means a non-Catholic can work in a Catholic business.

    Not all religions are anti-birth control.

    Therefore, no employer (save the ridiculously outdated “houses of worship exemption) can discriminate (ie bar) contraceptive coverage under the “Obamacare” law.

    Frankly, I believe Churches need to start paying their taxes just like everyone else–and be as accountable to the law, and to the public for shielding felons from justice.

    • February 11, 2013 at 6:22 pm
      Don't Call Me Shirley says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 5
      Thumb down 3

      They avoid taxes and shield felons, but they are somehow morally superior.

      • February 12, 2013 at 2:59 pm
        Bob says:
        Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 1
        Thumb down 13

        Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

        • February 13, 2013 at 9:57 am
          jw says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 1
          Thumb down 0

          Wow. Bob, I think you win the award for most comments hidden due to low rating.

          • February 13, 2013 at 12:45 pm
            Bob says:
            Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 1
            Thumb down 30

            Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

          • February 13, 2013 at 2:55 pm
            Bob says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 0

            JW:

            I am referring to not a vague non specific group.

            The liberals I named in this post, were all insulting the religion in a non proper, bigoted way.

            I listed names. Now BS is added to that list.

            And they are out of line.

        • February 13, 2013 at 10:24 am
          BS says:
          Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 11
          Thumb down 0

          “They have a vow of secrecy. They do not break it. You are stating that you do not believe in force to do with religion but then are asking they break their vow of secrecy when it comes to confession. They will not, and should not. The child has enough to go after the priest who did the bad action.”

          The abuse scandals didn’t come about because the Church didn’t act on the confessions of pedophile priests. They came about because the parents and children children made complaints. And instead of turning the accused priest over to the authorities, they assured the families that they would take care of it, and instead just shuttled the priests off to different parishes.

          • February 13, 2013 at 12:33 pm
            Bob says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 3

            BS:

            I was raised catholic, and you I can tell know not one damn thing about what happened. I don’t gear to show the entire story in one post.

            I only spelled out aspects of the story. I know more about this than you.

            The church followed their rules. Are you aware that religion has no restrictions on who can be a priest? And by belief and default, they are to forgive anyone?

            They aren’t acting immorally. In order to do that they would have to contradict their laws. They don’t. They are acting inpartially. Anyone can be a priest. You can’t be kicked out of being a priest. And from there it is up to the government to put the priest in jail, at which point, as I said, the church may defend the priest, much as an attorney provides defense to sometimes guilty clients. Only in this case they aren’t doing it for money. They are doing it because it’s just what they are supposed to do.

            You might not like it, but labeling the church about it is insanely stupid, prejudiced, and ignorant. No system is perfect. Our laws don’t always work. Our presidents appoint people from Goldman Sach’s, and that same dishonest president you don’t seem to insult regarding how he’s handling the economy, appointing the very people who destroyed it, “shuffling” them off to different positions in the government.

            My issue with you “liberals” is your blatent labeling, discrimination, and then pretending to be “open minded”.

            No. You want to be open minded in being against a common enemy. The “church” is not an entity you can blame for what happened with the children. And EVERY action the church did was completely understandble. It was an overall bad situation. The people at wrong were the priests. Not the church. Learn the difference, and then grow the hell up.

            Again: Agnostic speaking here. Raised Catholic. Do you think I moved away from being Catholic for a reason? I clearly don’t attend currently. The person who is insanely acting and labeling without knoweldge here is you. Just because you don’t agree with something doesn’t mean you should lable it for the world’s evils, especially when it comes to something like pedophilia. That’s not right. That’s not fair to the victim. Get pissed at the priests. Not the church.

          • February 13, 2013 at 12:52 pm
            Bob says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 3

            I should also note BS:

            Regarding confessions:

            Yes. The controversy did come about from confession. That was the tipping block about 10-15 years ago. I was just out of the Catholic church at that time, my mother was pissed about it.

            Us Catholics were even pissed about it. The priests were not divulging what they were told in confession to the courts, to be used as evidence to prove the priest who did the molesting was guilty.

            That was the final draw for the public.

            In present day, yes, you’re right, the issue is the shuttling around.

            But as I pointed out: What exactly is your goal? To force the church to get rid of their ideals? Get rid of the ideal that anyone can be forgiven if they do penance? Forgiveness is not free in the Catholic church. You have to do actual actions to be forgiven. It leaves opportunity for people to be better people.

            You seem to want the system to be punitive, to act as our punitive system does. It’s not the punitive system. It’s freaking religion. Let the punitive system handle that part, and leave relgion alone.

            Then everyone tweaked out.

          • February 13, 2013 at 1:50 pm
            BS says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 4
            Thumb down 0

            “The church followed their rules. Are you aware that religion has no restrictions on who can be a priest? And by belief and default, they are to forgive anyone?”

            That’s so not true. They most certainly DO have restrictions on who can be a priest. No women. No one under 25, and based on the diocese, no one over 45. No married men. (except for a few married Episcopalian priests who converted to Catholicism) No gay men. And in 2002, the Vatican ordered that background checks be required for all Church workers who have interaction with children – hence restricting those who had records of abuse.

            “They aren’t acting immorally. In order to do that they would have to contradict their laws. They don’t. They are acting inpartially. Anyone can be a priest. You can’t be kicked out of being a priest.”

            Where do you come up with this stuff??? Not anyone can become a priest. And while you are correct that a priest cannot be un-ordained, he can be forbidden from practicing for the rest of his life. (forced laicization)

            And, not acting to stop the child abuse that they were informed of, allowing the predator priests to continue their abuse and then trying to cover it up is most DEFINITELY immoral.

            “My issue with you “liberals” is your blatent labeling, discrimination, and then pretending to be “open minded”.”

            This has absolutely nothing to do with being liberal or conservative. It has to do with children being molested, and the Church doing nothing to stop it. This is not a right or left issue.

            “No. You want to be open minded in being against a common enemy. The “church” is not an entity you can blame for what happened with the children. And EVERY action the church did was completely understandble. It was an overall bad situation. The people at wrong were the priests. Not the church. Learn the difference, and then grow the hell up.”

            I beg your pardon? The Church was not to blame for their priests molesting children? The Church is not to blame for covering the abuse up? The Church is not to blame for promising to handle the abusive priests and then sending them to other parishes instead of removing them from their positions?

            It’s understandable what they did??? Seriously??? Understandable to hush up allegations of abuse against it’s priests? Understandable to transfer those priests to new parishes and new possible victims? The Church is supposed to PROTECT its parishioners. Especially the ones who are too young/small to protect themselves. They didn’t! How is that in any way understandable???

            “Again: Agnostic speaking here. Raised Catholic. Do you think I moved away from being Catholic for a reason? I clearly don’t attend currently. The person who is insanely acting and labeling without knoweldge here is you.”

            You know absolutely nothing about my religion or my upbringing. I could sit here and give you the dates of my Baptism, First Communion, Reconciliation, and Confirmation, but I don’t think it matters in this discussion. The Church itself has acknowledged it’s complicity in the child abuse scandals. It’s why the USCCB instituted ‘zero-tolerance’ policy for responding to allegations of sexual abuse.

            I’m not claiming that the entire Church is evil or that every priest is a pedophile. However, due to its long-lived culture of secrecy and cover-up, the Church as a whole has a long, long way to go to repair the damage caused by the actions of its priests and their responses to those actions.

          • February 13, 2013 at 2:04 pm
            BS says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 3
            Thumb down 0

            Bob:

            The controversy is NOT about confession.

            Yes, people were upset that priests/bishops would not reveal what they had been told in confession. But that is NOT what the controversy was about or how it started. The controversy was/IS that priests were abusing children, and when parents brought the issue to a senior member of the parish, NOTHING WAS DONE ABOUT IT! ‘Confession never would have been an issue if the offending priest had been reported to law enforcement instead of the Church trying to handle it in-house and covering it up.

          • February 13, 2013 at 2:18 pm
            Bob says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 3

            BS:

            The confession issue came first, then came the others.

            Limitations on priests:

            Let me phrase it another way, since you put out the women comment: If a priest goes through penance, a priest cannot be removed from being a priest. You know what I meant.

            Regarding other areas: Where do I come up with this stuff? Everything, not some, EVERYTHING I wrote was accurate.

            Now moving forward: The church did NOT do nothing about it. They acted per the rules I said:

            A priest will not be forced out of being a priest where penance is involved. It doesn’t happen. Ever. You want another role, tough.

            A priest is the one raping. Not the church. You want the church to take a position as the punitive law? Tough. It’s a religion.

            The church is acting in defense of the priest only in that the priest needs some sort of defense, and the act in the belief that the priest is fufilling some sort of premise. Do I agree the priest should be forgiven? Hell no. Do I believe the church is folowing a code? Hell yes.

            They have not been contradictory. The one thing that can be said of the Catholic church, they have been THE SAME through the course of their history of religious laws. Idiots in the past have been dumb enough to integrate punitive law with church law before. How did you like how that worked out? What’s that? You didn’t, and you and your liberal allies insult churches for that *secular* mingling causing wars in the past?

            Well then, keep the *secular* away from the religion, and folow your beliefs! And quit with the labeling.

          • February 13, 2013 at 2:41 pm
            jw says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 0

            Bob – you are generalizing, by the way. Very few people who comment on IJ are actually liberals. Some of us have opinions which are neither liberal nor conservative, but may be perceived as such by a reader. By far, though, the majority of insurance professionals and IJ readers are conservatives.

          • February 13, 2013 at 2:46 pm
            BS says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 2
            Thumb down 0

            Bob:

            Nowhere did I say force the priest out. I’m not even saying that the Church should punish that priest. That’s completely up to them and internal Church law. But, those priests should have been reported to law enforcement by their superiors. And even the VATICAN AGREES!!!

            The Church is responsible for the actions of its priests. It is also responsible for the actions of those who covered the abuse up, and in doing so, enabled it to continue. The same way Penn State and Joe Paterno bear responsibility for being informed of Jerry Sandusky’s child abuse, but choosing to not contact law enforcement, and instead covering it up, the Church bears responsibility for the children hurt by its priests.

          • February 13, 2013 at 2:54 pm
            Bob says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 2

            BS:

            So back to your comment that they are not being reported and this is the fault of the CHURCH:

            Priests are being reported, except when PRIESTS don’t follow the vatican? And the Vatican even agrees? WOW!

            So then, the CHURCH is doing everything right!??!?!

            WOW! Now then baby, go back to bed, and shut your #%@$#%ing mouth smart ass, and quit with the insults on the church. Got it?

          • February 13, 2013 at 2:57 pm
            Bob says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 2

            And Again:

            This coming from an Agnostic BS.

            You ARE being biased, you ARE being discriminatory, you ARE holding the church to a higher standard than the government, you ARE being bigoted, you ARE labeling religion.

            If you’re not, prove it.

          • February 13, 2013 at 3:19 pm
            BS says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 2
            Thumb down 0

            Bob:

            When the priests don’t follow the Vatican… Wait, what??? That’s not what I said.

            They WEREN’T being reported. Their actions WERE being covered up. THAT was the fault of the Church. The Vatican agreed that this needed to be corrected, and said that going forward that abuse needs to be reported. This doesn’t just negate decades of covering up the abuse of children. It’s a step in the right direction, but they still have a ways to go.

            And, where exactly have I insulted the Church? Stating that they have been involved in sex abuse scandals and that their culture of secrecy and cover up is what helped cause the scandals is not an insult. It’s a fact.

          • February 13, 2013 at 3:27 pm
            BS says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 2
            Thumb down 0

            Bob:

            I am being biased and discriminatory because I think the Church should be held to the standards as any other organization that deals with children?

            Many states have mandatory reporting laws. If doctors, teachers, counselors, etc. suspect a child is being abused, they are required by law to report it. I don’t think the Church should be above that law.

            I think you are biased if you think they shouldn’t be held to the same standard.

          • February 14, 2013 at 3:32 pm
            Bob says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 2

            BS:

            You are being biased because you cannot list what actual section of the Vatican church is in error.

            You are stating which people are in error. In your last post you finally admitted that even the Church doesn’t agree with the shuttling of priests and no one being told.

            Not everyone follows the program.

            I listed the program, and then you arrogantly said that women can’t be priests! (when we were obviously talking about restrictions on CURRENT priests)

            The Church holds themself to the same standard.

            With regards to the other areas:

            A priest who goes through penance won’t be thrown out of priesthood. We aren’t going to put punitive state into religion.

            Confession and the vow of secrecy isn’t violating anything. It’s consistent.

            If the government doesn’t jail a priest, and the priest stays a priest, well then why are you blaming the church for keeping the person a priest and not the government for not keeping the jailed priest under monitoring? How about a program to re-cooperate the priest should he keep his job? In that area, the catholic church DOES have a program, and the state usually does not.

            The church is at a higher standard of the government in that area.

            Moreover, you have not listed ONE catholic doctrine regarding “pedophiles” that is essentially allowing “pedophilia” to occur. They do NOT allow pedophilia, and the insult, and the bias, and the insanity, of blaming a church?

            Really. Go #%@% yourself. Pardon the extreme tone here: But my mother was molested, my sister was raped. It had not one damn thing to do with a church.

            1 in 7 women are raped or molested. 1 in 5 people are catholic. You really think that all these rape is occurring because of the Catholic church? You really think that the government is on top of this shit?

            Let me put a “ha” and a “ha”. The government is letting rapists out on good behavior at a rate far higher than priests. But, if the government says that someone made a valiant effort, hey hey they must be right eh?

            I do NOT see you critisizing the government on this.

            I see you acting like an ass. So again: Knock it off.

          • February 14, 2013 at 5:24 pm
            BS says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 2
            Thumb down 0

            Bob:

            You know, I was trying to have a civilized discussion with you, but you are obviously not reading or just not comprehending what I’ve written. I’m not sure which is worse.

            You said that there are no restrictions on who can become a priest. I pointed out a number of CURRENT restrictions on who can become a priest. Not just women. Restrictions involving age, if they are married, and previous criminal history as determined by background checks.

            You said that a priest can’t be thrown out of the priesthood. I agreed with you. However, as I also mentioned, they CAN be forbidden from practicing as a priest for the rest of his life.

            Once again, I am not blaming the Church for keeping a priest or not throwing them out of the priesthood. If they want to keep a priest that has been accused of child abuse, that’s their decision. If they feel that be can be ‘redeemed,’ that’s up to them.

            My issue, which I have stated over and over again, is that when senior members of the Church were informed by PARENTS that their children were being abused, they covered the abuse up. They promised to deal with the priest, and instead, would just send him to a new parish. They wouldn’t inform the new parish of the accusations against, and many times, he’d abuse again.

            They didn’t deal with the problem. They just moved it to another parish.

            And once again, my issue is not with the secrecy surrounding confession. A priest should NEVER reveal what he learns in confession. It’s protected by the Seal of Confession, and I would NEVER expect or want a priest to break that seal. My issue is that senior members of the Church did not act on what they learned OUTSIDE OF CONFESSION from the parents and children who were abused. They did not report the accusations to the authorities. Instead, they tried to cover them up.

            Nowhere have I implied that the Catholic Church ‘allows’ pedophilia or that they are OK with it in any way. However, I did state that for many years, when they were informed of it, they didn’t do anything to stop it. They didn’t report the priests to the authorities. They didn’t reassign them to positions where they wouldn’t have interaction with children. They made promises to the parents to deal with these priests, and instead just moved them to new locations.

            As I said in my last post, the Church HAS instituted reporting requirements and is doing what it can to accept responsibility for what happened and fix it. And that’s wonderful. But, it still doesn’t change the fact that this abuse was going on for decades, and it will take a long time for the Church to rebuild trust.

            I’m very sorry to hear about your mother and sister. That’s absolutely horrific. But, they really have nothing to do with this conversation. The government’s abysmal sentencing for rape convictions also has no bearing on this discussion. We are specifically discussing molestation of children by Catholic priests and the Church’s horrible response to it. Please stop trying to bring the government into this discussion.

            And really, calling me an ass is childish. I have not called you names or insulted you once. I have pointed out where I believe you are wrong and will continue to do so. But I haven’t resorted to name calling. And honestly, if you can’t debate without resulting to name calling, maybe your argument isn’t as strong as you think it is.

  • February 11, 2013 at 8:36 pm
    nomesaneman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 11
    Thumb down 2

    As the late great Earl Butz (Sec of Agriculture under Nixon) once said about Pope Paul’s stance on birth control: “He no playa da game, he no makea da rules”

  • February 13, 2013 at 12:56 pm
    Brokie says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 18
    Thumb down 1

    How can catholic women tolerate this gibberish which is dictated by old ‘celibate’ men with their ‘leader’in another country! It’s the 21st century. It’s medicine. Unplanned pregnancies are NOT blessings from god. How can the bishops be so delusional to think that young and middle aged catholics – men and women – single and married – do not practice birth control. Get a clue – THEY ALL DO! These same bishops don’t allow female priests. The same ones that sanction pedophilia. The Catholic Church is sitting on such immense wealth it could feed, clothe, house and immunize the 3rd world. What would Jesus do?

    • February 13, 2013 at 4:20 pm
      Patti Cake in the East says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 2
      Thumb down 1

      Yeah, Brokie. You lefties want to totally rewrite the Constitution of the United States so that it fits into your agenda. Why not just rewrite the Holy Bible to fit your agenda as well, because it’s ‘old’?

  • February 13, 2013 at 2:46 pm
    CA says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    People please keep your personal pain and bias out of this discussion. Attacking a building doesn’t make yours have a stronger foundation. Stop being petty children, grow up and coverse about the actual article.

    Living in this country we have freedom to, and freedom from. The federal government has no business in insurance mandates and regulation. It is up to the states as defined in Mccarron Ferguson Act of 1945.

    This is why they established “state-exchanges” to try and work their way around this law. Certain parties in congress have been working to break down this law for a while now.

    P.S. it’s Dolan, not Donlan.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features