Trump Ends Health Insurer Subsidy; Allows Association Health Plans, Expense Accounts

By | October 12, 2017

  • October 12, 2017 at 3:57 pm
    Doug Fisher says:
    Hot debate. What do you think?
    Thumb up 15
    Thumb down 7

    Republicans always grumble about judges “legislating from the bench.”

    How about “Legislating from the high chair?”

    Par for the course for our Man Child in Chief.

    • October 12, 2017 at 4:18 pm
      PolarBeaRepeal says:
      Hot debate. What do you think?
      Thumb up 8
      Thumb down 16

      Where was your voice when ‘O’ pulled out his pen and phone over 200 times over 8 years?

      Yeah; that ACA thing is loved by ALL Americans right now…. how dare TrumPresident cut it apart, one EO at a time.

      I think I’ll write a letter to the White House instructing POTUS on other aspects of ACA that can be dismantled by EO. Gotta go now…

      • October 12, 2017 at 4:29 pm
        Doug Fisher says:
        Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 18
        Thumb down 3

        Luckily for you, he can definitely read things written in crayon.

        Re: Obama’s use of EOs: I was against them, too. I never voted for Obama, either, so I am not sure what you are trying to insinuate…

        The Legislative branch should be allowed to legislate. When they cannot come to an agreement on which laws to repeal or enact, that does not give the President, regardless of party, the mandate to pass his own laws, right?

        Would you be alright with the next president waving a wand to undo all the stuff that Trump is currently breaking? Just go above the heads of congress to do anything he or she wants, right? That is nonsense and you know it.

        • October 13, 2017 at 6:53 am
          PolarBeaRepeal says:
          Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 2
          Thumb down 14

          Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

      • October 13, 2017 at 7:47 am
        Ron says:
        Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 17
        Thumb down 5

        Since President Trump acts like a 3rd grader, it only reasons that his blind followers would follow suit.

  • October 13, 2017 at 6:59 am
    PolarBeaRepeal says:
    Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 3
    Thumb down 14

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

  • October 13, 2017 at 7:02 am
    PolarBeaRepeal says:
    Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 8
    Thumb down 19

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    • October 13, 2017 at 7:44 am
      Doug Fisher says:
      Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 23
      Thumb down 4

      I presume these EOs will get challenged in court, since they seem to be all about Trump’s unwillingness to follow a law as passed and implemented.

      I cannot see how, for example, any president can effectively pick and choose which laws to follow. It is exactly the same thing as all of the conservatives complaining about Obama doing it for laws he wanted to pick and choose to enforce or throw out.

      It causes turmoil to the checks and balances supposedly guaranteed by our government system.

      Trump couldn’t wait for a death spiral that wasn’t happening, so of course he tries to create his own. The funniest thing is, whatever happens next he gets to/has to own. It is no longer Obamacare, it’s TrumpCare. If you remove the mechanism which pays for the entire law to exist and function properly, you own what comes next.

      He can’t complain, although he definitely will (and frequently), about people rioting in the streets when they get thrown off their coverage or when their premiums skyrocket, since the incompetent GOP congresspeople STILL won’t pass a bill to save their lives.

      They talked for years and years about having a plan, well it just may be put up or shut up time.

      • October 13, 2017 at 1:37 pm
        PolarBeaRepeal says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 3
        Thumb down 12

        Challenge, schmallenge. Go for it! Not gonna work with…. Gorsuch on the bench. Your frustration level will rise.

        • October 17, 2017 at 12:41 pm
          UW says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 2
          Thumb down 1

          So above you are whining (wrongly) about circumventing laws, then you cheer unilaterally doing away with a law because they can’t get votes in Congress, and cheer that it will be upheld because Republicans circumvented the Constitutional right of a president to appoint Supreme Court justices, and changed the rules in Congress to force a vote on this candidate.

          Just be honest and say you don’t care about laws, rules, norms, etc., and want anything that allows you to pay fewer taxes, and/or hurt poor people and minorities.

      • October 13, 2017 at 1:47 pm
        1blessedmom says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 8
        Thumb down 8

        Wait a minute…”follow a law as passed and implemented”??? Do you know how many times B.O. used EO’s to implement parts of the ACA? That system is crumbling (as intended). The President is not going to allow this country to go under a one pay system. That’s not what he was elected to do. Big problem with no easy solution.

        • October 13, 2017 at 7:53 pm
          Doug Fisher says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 6
          Thumb down 1

          I thought this comment may have held some weight, until I did the research:

          https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/obama-subjects.html

          Go away, troll.

          • October 17, 2017 at 7:36 pm
            PolarBeaRepeal says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 0

            The past is irrelevant; ACA is going away, either tomorrow or today, regardless of what you do or say.

            The Death Spiral is nearly complete. Get your cameras ready for the final plunge, happening soon.

  • October 13, 2017 at 7:46 am
    Ron says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 6
    Thumb down 2

    I am still waiting for someone to explain who will regulate this interstate commerce.

    There are only 3 choices:

    A. Federal regulation
    B. States are forced to allow policies that may go against their laws and regulations
    C. Unregulated health insurance.

    All other options are currently, and have been legal.

    • October 13, 2017 at 8:22 am
      PolarBeaRepeal says:
      Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 3
      Thumb down 13

      Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

      • October 13, 2017 at 8:55 am
        Ron says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 4
        Thumb down 2

        Sooooo, nothing.

        What is the 4th choice?

    • October 13, 2017 at 8:22 am
      PolarBeaRepeal says:
      Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 1
      Thumb down 12

      Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    • October 17, 2017 at 3:45 pm
      FFA says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 1

      Health Insurance should be the hands of the state. The Fed Govt should have never been involved. Now we have another 30%+ rate hike coming. Who didn’t know that when the govt gets involved, cost just goes up? Crappy Distribution system. Crap policies. Crap customer service with no one to complain to when their system screws up. Not to mention the disruption in the market.

      This system is was always be garbage. Far inferior to what it was.

  • October 13, 2017 at 9:01 am
    David says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 2
    Thumb down 10

    I hope he succeeds in crumbling this awful mess of a healthcare law. I have an Obamacare Bronze plan (because I am legally required to), however, I tell my Doctor I am uninsured because it is cheaper for me to be uninsured. (he gives my 75% off for being uninsured, and Obamacare only covers 60%)

    • October 13, 2017 at 10:52 am
      Doug Fisher says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 12
      Thumb down 3

      You know, you could, um, not pay for a plan you aren’t using…right?

      Take the uninsured tax penalty at the end of the year and quit paying for medical coverage you apparently don’t need.

      Whatever the Republicans have proposed won’t fix anything you are looking at, anyway.

      • October 13, 2017 at 11:27 am
        Captain Planet says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 14
        Thumb down 5

        We need to go back to the good ol’ days when we could be denied for ridiculous pre-existing conditions like acne, blow through our limit, and head straight to bankruptcy with the #1 cause being medical bills. Man, those times were great. Maybe we can be so lucky and even have the bottom fall out of to economy, too. Oh, and wars – we need more of those. Hopefully with nukes this time!

        • October 17, 2017 at 2:32 pm
          FFA says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 0
          Thumb down 1

          You keep ignoring the fact that plans were available for the pre x crowd. Just cause you don’t want to acknowledge them, does not mean they didn’t exist. Didn’t need to screw 90% of people. Now where are we at? Another 30%+ rate hike coming with crap policies & crap networks. Could have helped the 10% out and left the 90% alone.

          And how is the war on ISIS coming along? I am seeing reports that’s just about done. The jack ass in N Korea, wouldn’t matter who is in office. He gonna do it anyways.

      • October 13, 2017 at 1:40 pm
        PolarBeaRepeal says:
        Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 3
        Thumb down 13

        Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

      • October 13, 2017 at 1:43 pm
        PolarBeaRepeal says:
        Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 4
        Thumb down 14

        Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

  • October 13, 2017 at 11:03 am
    Jason says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 2
    Thumb down 4

    All this action to destroy ACA (which should be destroyed) yet none of it ends the individual mandate or employer mandate.So millions of American’s and hundreds of thousands of businesses still face penalties and the extreme burden of trying to comply with the law in offering coverage and the reporting that comes along with that. Why does the POTUS not issue a EO ordering the IRS not to charge any penalties to individuals and businesses and ending the requirement for employers to file 1094’s and 1095’s? Do this and ACA is dead instantly.

    • October 13, 2017 at 1:44 pm
      PolarBeaRepeal says:
      Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 1
      Thumb down 11

      Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

      • October 13, 2017 at 4:42 pm
        Agent says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 2
        Thumb down 10

        Make a Conservative mad by telling them a lie.
        Make a Liberal mad by telling them the truth.

        Theodore Roosevelt

        • October 13, 2017 at 5:21 pm
          LOL! says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 6
          Thumb down 3

          Make a Moderate mad by nothing getting accomplished because both sides are too extreme.

          I’m copywriting this one. LOL!

        • October 16, 2017 at 9:04 am
          Captain Planet says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 7
          Thumb down 1

          So, by that token, you must be totally PO’d at Faux Newz.

        • October 17, 2017 at 12:45 pm
          UW says:
          Like or Dislike:
          Thumb up 6
          Thumb down 1

          This isn’t an actual Roosevelt quote. It was created in the 2000’s so mostly uneducated conservatives could post it online.

          Literally every single thing I’ve ever seen you post that can be fact checked, including dozens of “quotes” have been wrong.

          • October 17, 2017 at 6:03 pm
            Doug Fisher says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 0
            Thumb down 1

            Also ignoring the fact that if Teddy Roosevelt were around today, they would hate his guts. Monopoly busting, conservation loving, hardcore progressive taxation Teddy Roosevelt? Lol.

            Frankly, I would be all for another Bull Moose Party

  • October 13, 2017 at 1:31 pm
    FFA says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 6
    Thumb down 6

    It should make the Dems happy. Corporate Welfare getting cut off.

    • October 13, 2017 at 1:45 pm
      PolarBeaRepeal says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 1
      Thumb down 8

      LOL!

    • October 13, 2017 at 2:49 pm
      Agent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 2
      Thumb down 11

      Hi FFA, hope you are doing well. We are happy that our President is doing the job we elected him to do. The spineless Congress wouldn’t do their job getting rid of the worst legislation in history, so he is doing it for them. By the way, has Illinois declared bankruptcy yet? Close race with Connecticut. Something about run a way graft and corruption and massive Progressive spending seems to be causing trouble.

      • October 13, 2017 at 3:17 pm
        Ron says:
        Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 11
        Thumb down 1

        President Obama used EOs to get things done due to a spineless Congress, now President Trump is doing the same. The common denominator? Republicans holding the majority in Congress.

        Thank you for agreeing with me that Republicans have no interest in governing.

      • October 17, 2017 at 1:46 pm
        FFA says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 1
        Thumb down 1

        Im so fed up with IL. Obama brought Il politics to DC and here we are.

        I just wish this health care would get settled once and for all. Worst business decision I ever made was jumping into this crap. Talk about living with regrets. If they aren’t screwing up rates and distribution, they are screwing up networks. As soon as they screw them up, they make the horrible policies OBama rammed down our throats even worse then they were the year before. Before the Er Co Pay kicks in, you now have to satisfy Deductible. Ive got over $8000 unpaid bills sitting on my desk because of the f’d up policies that Obama told everyone they were great. It will eventually bite everyone in the rear end. I long for the Flat $5000 deductible days to come back around. This is was and always be garbage. Screw 90% to accommodate 10%.

        On another note, I have all but stopped watching the NFL. Just ruined my escape from my daily life. I gave them a total of 5 minutes last Sunday. They used to get 10 hours on Sunday alone. TV ratings are tanking and the networks are responding. I read that the networks didn’t televise the N A and the announcers didn’t even talk about it. Finally a smart business decision.

  • October 13, 2017 at 4:25 pm
    Dennis J. Byrne says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 8
    Thumb down 0

    **Trump Unveils Full-Bore Obamacare Sabotage. As premiums rise in response to the sabotage, the main public recourse will be to replace the Republican-led government with one capable of passing a workable and humane health care law**. Trump and his party have never been able to figure out a viable alternative to Obamacare. Having failed to repeal and replace the law, they have set out to wreck it. The Trump administration is taking two steps to accomplish this goal. First, it is opening two loopholes to allow healthy people to purchase unregulated insurance, splitting the market and loading more costs onto people with expensive medical needs. Second, it announced tonight it is ending cost-sharing payments to insurers who take on low-income customers. / Both these changes are designed to put pressure on insurers, increasing premiums by an average of 19 percent, and even splitting up the individual insurance markets. Whether they will succeed is yet to be seen. States committed to making Obamacare work will find solutions that keep their markets intact. (Indeed, there has been a marked difference in the premium levels of states that are trying to help cover their citizens and those that aren’t.) / What’s more, by withholding payments promised in law, the administration is exposing itself to a lawsuit it could very well lose. Premiums are going to rise in the meantime, because insurers are subjected to greater uncertainty and the now-demonstrated knowledge that the administration is deliberately sabotaging the law they are operating under./ The exchanges in 2017 had stabilized financially, as insurers found a profitable price point. The Republican Party has, as a matter of theological principle, refused to accept the possibility that Obamacare might succeed at its stated ends. If Obamacare were truly collapsing, sabotage would not be necessary. It is the law’s success, not its failure, that has made Trump so determined to wreck it. / Congress is not going to repeal and replace Obamacare. The Medicaid expansion, which accounts for a majority of the law’s coverage gains, remains in place and is not vulnerable to administrative sabotage. Individual consumers are going to experience a lot of financial pain as a result of Trump’s action

    • October 13, 2017 at 5:14 pm
      PolarBeaRepeal says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 3
      Thumb down 8

      Hey! Byrned by the liberal media fake news….

      Payments to insurers to subsidize risks are UNCONSTITUTIONAL because Congress NEVER authorized them.

      But, don’t let the facts get in the way of your false narrative. Carry on with more amusing posts.

      PS ACA was specifically designed to implode, to lead to calls for POTUS Hillary to install a Single Slayer, er, Single Delayer, er, Single Payer HC system.

      • October 13, 2017 at 5:16 pm
        PolarBeaRepeal says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 2
        Thumb down 7

        PS #2; ever hear of something going on now called a Death Spiral?

    • October 13, 2017 at 5:53 pm
      Doug Fisher says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 6
      Thumb down 1

      Dennis,

      Heck of an eloquent reply and well thought out!

      You know what they say about pearls before swine though. Didn’t take long for our resident trolls to regurgitate the garbage they hear on TV/radio. X

      • October 17, 2017 at 7:39 pm
        PolarBeaRepeal says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 0
        Thumb down 0

        The Constitutional requirement for Congress to approve payments made by the US Treasury is what you’re missing, and will continue to miss, due to your brainwashing by Socialists.

  • October 13, 2017 at 5:02 pm
    Here'sAnIdea says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 7
    Thumb down 0

    With obesity rates continuing to grow for adults and children, any changes to healthcare is simply putting a Band-aid on the gaping wound of lack of preventative care. Costs for managing debilitating diseases like diabetes, cancer, and heart disease, are going to continue to increase astronomically every year lowering life expectancy.

    Instead of marketing for ACA, they should be marketing to kids and families about how fresh fruits and vegetables should be at least 70% of your regular diet, and implementing programs to combat the brain-washing fast food industry and make these foods more accessible to lower-income families. Exercise is only a viable option once a person’s body has returned to a healthy status. Exercising without a correct diet will not help you lose weight or feel better. Energy is in what you eat.

    Want to save money on healthcare? Get people healthy.

    • October 16, 2017 at 9:08 am
      Captain Planet says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 6
      Thumb down 1

      Amen, I couldn’t agree more. A good motto to live by – if the restaurant has a drive-thru, steer clear!

    • October 17, 2017 at 4:19 pm
      SWFL Agent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      Disagree. Healthy people don’t save the healthcare system money. When someone dies, suddenly, at 55 of heart disease or lung cancer, it costs the system much less than paying for their knee replacements, eyelid surgery, medicines, cancer treatments, and dementia when they’ve turned 85. Prolonging lives, which is the primary goal of medicine, is what’s driving healthcare costs. Not trying to say we shouldn’t do it, we should. We’re all going to die from something and our better medicines and advanced treatments are just making the final years of life more expensive.

    • October 17, 2017 at 7:41 pm
      PolarBeaRepeal says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      It’s sad, actually, that you have a good point, but mis-stated the obvious problem. Health care being free enables people to not care about their health, and get fat, etc. Thus, costs rise without incentives to control one’s health insurance premiums – if they’re free or highly subsidized.

  • October 17, 2017 at 3:01 pm
    Doug Fisher says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 2
    Thumb down 0

    Hey, look at that, Republican Congresspeople actually did something right for one. They agreed to follow the law and fund subsidies for two years. That should put some stability back in the market.

    • October 17, 2017 at 7:42 pm
      PolarBeaRepeal says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      Actually, two Congressmen agreed on that plan,… which will never fly.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features