Texas / South Central News

Judge in La. Rules in Favor of Insurance Companies in Flood Lawsuit

Insurance companies are not responsible for hurricane-related flood damage if homeowners carry coverage only for windstorms, a federal judge in Louisiana has ruled in a lawsuit over dispute claims stemming from Hurricane Rita, the Associated Press reported.

Advertisement

"You get what you pay for, and what they paid for was wind damage,'' said U.S. District Judge Richard Haik in a ruling May 18.

But Haik also said: "I wish I didn't think that. I am not a fan of insurance companies.''

Attorneys for homeowners had argued that under Louisiana law, insurance companies must pay total losses on a destroyed home when at least some of the damage was caused by a hazard covered by insurance, unless a disclaimer is given on the policy application.

The lawsuit was filed against State Farm and Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance on behalf of two families and sought class-action status. The insurance companies said the policies explicitly excluded flood damage

A decision will be made over the next week on whether to appeal the ruling, said plaintiff attorney Kenneth DeJean.

A similar issue is set for a hearing next month in New Orleans in a separate federal lawsuit filed over disputed Hurricane Katrina-related insurance claims.

Information from: The Advocate, www.theadvocate.com.

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
fLOOD iNSURANCE PROGRAM FEMALE ADJUSTER
May 31, 2006, 9:31 pm
RE: Wind vs Water - When water (rain, snow, etc) IS covered. ClaimHawk
May 24, 2006, 5:37 pm
Wind vs Water Enough Already
May 24, 2006, 3:25 pm
To Mark - True Indemnification Details Absolutely Do Matter Roger Poe
May 24, 2006, 12:52 pm
RE: To Ray - Brief Commentary Can Avoid Reasoning On Things Mark
May 23, 2006, 11:19 am
To Ray - Brief Commentary Can Avoid Reasoning On Things Roger Poe
May 23, 2006, 9:31 am
RE: To Mark - How About Another Viewpiont Ray
May 23, 2006, 8:01 am
To Mark - How About Another Viewpiont Roger Poe
May 22, 2006, 7:33 pm
RE: RE: RE: To CTC - Covered Causes Should Be Properly Cover Mark
May 22, 2006, 5:29 pm
RE: RE: To CTC - Covered Causes Should Be Properly Covered Roger Poe
May 22, 2006, 5:05 pm
RE: To CTC - Covered Causes Should Be Properly Covered Cut the Crud
May 22, 2006, 2:41 pm
To CTC - Covered Causes Should Be Properly Covered Roger Poe
May 22, 2006, 2:03 pm
Here come de judge... Ray
May 22, 2006, 1:35 pm
Well? Cut The Crud
May 22, 2006, 12:45 pm