Safety Hazards at Texas Manufacturing Plant Lead to $58K in Fines

June 19, 2012

A manufacturing facility in Texas has been fined $58,000 by federal regulators for exposing workers to safety hazards.

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited Progressive Inc. in Arlington with 15 safety violations for exposing workers to machine guarding and electrical hazards.

Thirteen serious violations involve failing to mark emergency exits; keep fire extinguishers mounted with unobstructed access; store compressed gas cylinders properly; guard belts and pulleys on machinery; properly adjust tongue and rest guards on grinders; and use permanent wiring instead of extension cords.

A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.

Two other-than-serious violations include failing to provide a load rating on an overhead storage location and to close unused openings on electrical boxes.

An other-than-serious violation is one that has a direct relationship to job safety and health, but probably would not cause death or serious physical harm.

Progressive Inc. is a division of Heroux-Devtek, which is headquartered in Longueuil, Québec, Canada. Progressive employs about 150 workers who develop, manufacture and repair commercial and military aerospace products.

The company has 15 business days from receipt of its citations to comply, request an informal conference with OSHA’s Fort Worth area director or contest the citations and proposed penalties before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

Source: OSHA

 

Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • June 19, 2012 at 3:17 pm
    R says:
    In TX, WC is not mandatory. And carriers have cut back loss control services to the bare minimum to meet state regulations and no more.
  • June 19, 2012 at 2:10 pm
    Underwriter says:
    I wonder who the comp carrier is on this one? I would have thought their loss control department would have made recommendations when they did the survey to get them in compli... read more
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features