Poe Increases Insurance for Program

August 8, 2005

  • August 8, 2005 at 8:50 am
    Marty Cohen says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    All the computer software will never bring this company back from the dead.

    POE SUCKS!

  • August 8, 2005 at 6:10 am
    LL says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Is there something wrong with MSB?

  • August 9, 2005 at 11:18 am
    Fat Cow says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Wow. That Brien guy seems smart. Sounds like he is really looking out for us Floridians. Someone should nominate him for some type of hero award…

  • August 9, 2005 at 12:05 pm
    b altman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Marty our State of Florida CFO thinks this is a “fine” company.

  • August 10, 2005 at 3:25 am
    Gomer Pyle says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Considering Poe’s poor claim payment reputation, it seems that their policyholders will benefit from higher premiums and more under/unpaid claims.

    I wonder how much Poe contributes to Mr. Gallagher’s campaign fund (no matter how much, it won’t get him elected governor)?

    “Golly, I found Gomer’s pile!”

  • August 9, 2005 at 3:45 am
    The Commish says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The “benefit” that insureds will receive of course is significantly higher premiums. If they are underinsured (and most Floridians are) then insurance to value is not a bad thing. However, if they generate significant increases it would appear this is more about trying to generate additional surplus. Increased values will result in increased premium.

  • August 10, 2005 at 9:12 am
    b altman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The insurance to value issue is valid. Of course it generates additional premium to the carriers and more important commissions to Agents and Poe Insurance Managers. It is easy to slam Poe over many issues (lousy claims service etc, but this is not one of them.

  • August 11, 2005 at 7:28 am
    tribbs says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Gomer, perhaps the increased limits of coverage will result in a higher dollar amount for claims paid. This should help an individual such as yourself in the future being that the fee for your wonderful service will be capped at 10% of the claim payment.

  • August 12, 2005 at 10:40 am
    bric-a brac says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Poor claims service? Not according to the state. Sounds like a bunch of PA’s whining because Poe doesn’t just roll over on bogus demands which probably results in way higher premiums than any ITV program.

  • August 16, 2005 at 11:43 am
    alex says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The issue at hand is insurance carriers trying to squeeze money from where ever they can. In todays real estate market any home can easily be valued / appraised at $300,000. But does this mean that in an event of a total loss this is what it would cost to repair it. A scale should be created to adjust for exorbitant real estate vales; i.e square footage x $60.00. Insurance coverage should not be based on current real estate values.

  • August 18, 2005 at 5:13 am
    LL says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I don’t know what kind of house you expect to get at sq ft x $60. Probably without O&P. Not something that passes the new hurricane building code or something I want to live in.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features