Southeast News
Miss. AG Hood Attacks State Farm as 'Robber Baron'
By Brian Kern
February 16, 2007
In a second press conference in as many days, Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood came out fighting against a recent decision by State Farm Insurance Co. to stop writing new home and commercial property policies in the state.
"We're looking a robber baron in the face," Hood said. "State Farm is not a responsible corporate citizen."
Hood's attack prompted a State Farm spokesman to say, "We never intended to pick a fight."
State Farm, which writes about 30 percent of the state's homeowners insurance market, said it would continue to serve existing customers and would write auto policies but would no longer accept new home or business property risks due to what it believes is a difficult business and legal environment in the state.
The insurer recently lost a key case involving its handling of a Hurricane Katrina claim and was assessed $1 million in punitive damages. Also, in separate settlements, it agreed to pay about $80 million to end lawsuits filed by 640 policyholders and to pay an additional $50 million to reconsider claims of up to 35,000 additional policyholders.
Hood wants to keep State Farm from "cherry picking" the lines of insurance it wants to write. He proposed legislation that would require State Farm to continue writing new homeowners and commercial property policies in Mississippi if it wants to write other risks.
Hood also requested that Gov. Haley Barbour and Insurance Commissioner George Dale issue emergency executive orders requiring insurance companies to continue writing homeowners and commercial property insurance policies until the Legislature has had time to address his proposal.
"I call on Governor Barbour and Commissioner Dale to use their emergency powers to temporarily prevent State Farm from hurting its own insurance agents and Mississippi consumers," Hood said.
Hood's legislation mirrors a measure recently enacted in Florida.
Hood's statements and proposal seemed to further convince State Farm that its decision was the right one.
"This is a remarkable response to a business decision. Today's actions show just how unpredictable and untenable the current environment can be," commented Fraser Engerman of State Farm's corporate media relations department.
Hood, who is himself insured by State Farm, questioned why State Farm is curtailing its business across the entire state and not just in high-risk coastal areas. He said he feels the added insult is that State Farm is now discriminating against its Mississippi agents who face a loss of potential business.
Hood suggested State Farm's decision was a surprise given recent talks to settle disputes with the insurer over its handling of Hurricane Katrina claims.
"One of the main reasons I settled our state court litigation against State Farm was to keep them writing homeowners policies in Mississippi, to stabilize our insurance markets, and to help our coastal residents and businesses rebuild," Hood reiterated. "Mississippi should not allow State Farm to breach its promise and continue to profit from others in our state."
State Farm indicated the decision was necessary for financial reasons.
"We did not come to this decision lightly," Engerman said. "We hope the environment will improve."
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article
| Subject |
Posted By |
Posted On |
| Adjusters were inexperienced but Followed Co Policy |
Insured by Mattel |
Feb 27, 2007, 10:19 am |
| The New 10 COMMANDMENTS for State Farm |
Kim David |
Feb 26, 2007, 11:26 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Requested Living Expenses Denied with Insults |
LL |
Feb 26, 2007, 10:23 pm |
| RE: RE: Requested Living Expenses Denied with Insults |
temblor |
Feb 25, 2007, 10:14 pm |
| RE: Requested Living Expenses Denied with Insults |
LL |
Feb 25, 2007, 9:33 pm |
| Requested Living Expenses Denied with Insults |
kim david |
Feb 25, 2007, 1:19 pm |
| Hurricane Loss |
Temblor |
Feb 25, 2007, 12:44 pm |
| My God Kim I am so sorry~!!~ |
Melanie |
Feb 25, 2007, 11:56 am |
| To: Mark |
Kim David |
Feb 25, 2007, 11:41 am |
| RE: RE: sorry you do not understand insurance |
Yes I will (Care) |
Feb 25, 2007, 11:31 am |
| NO ONE OFFERED LIVING EXPENSES LA2MS |
KIM |
Feb 24, 2007, 4:27 pm |
| RE: I do not sell P&C...Agents did not offer Living Exp 2 cl |
Temblor |
Feb 24, 2007, 2:10 pm |
| I do not sell P&C...Agents did not offer Living Exp 2 client |
Kim David |
Feb 24, 2007, 12:20 pm |
| RE: RE: Kim David sorry you do not understand insurance |
temblor |
Feb 23, 2007, 5:17 pm |
| RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud |
Mark |
Feb 23, 2007, 4:27 pm |
| RE: Kim David sorry you do not understand insurance |
Ralph B |
Feb 23, 2007, 3:52 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud |
Larry Lubell |
Feb 23, 2007, 3:21 pm |
| RE: RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud |
Kim David |
Feb 23, 2007, 3:01 pm |
| RE: Mark. They want a Rolex but only pay the price of a Time |
Kim David |
Feb 23, 2007, 2:55 pm |
| RE: RE: To: DDT RE: Kim David |
Kim David |
Feb 23, 2007, 2:52 pm |
| RE: RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud |
Sho' Nuff |
Feb 23, 2007, 1:15 pm |
| RE: To: DDT RE: Kim David |
abd |
Feb 23, 2007, 1:03 pm |
| Mark. They want a Rolex but only pay the price of a Timex. |
Ralph B |
Feb 23, 2007, 11:30 am |
| RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud |
Mark |
Feb 23, 2007, 11:08 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Melanie are you off your prozac again.... |
Money? |
Feb 23, 2007, 10:49 am |
| RE: RE: Melanie are you off your prozac again.... |
Ralph Balamabama |
Feb 23, 2007, 10:28 am |
| RE: Melanie are you off your prozac again.... |
Pro? |
Feb 23, 2007, 10:16 am |
| RE: RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud |
Kim David |
Feb 23, 2007, 10:15 am |
| Melanie are you off your prozac again.... |
Ralph Balamabama |
Feb 23, 2007, 9:58 am |
| RE: How about an original thought of your own. ... |
Melanie |
Feb 23, 2007, 9:54 am |
| How about an original thought of your own. ... |
Ralph Balamabama |
Feb 23, 2007, 9:48 am |
| RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud |
Mark |
Feb 23, 2007, 8:08 am |
| RE: Kim David sorry I do understand insurance fraud |
Ralph & Mark this ones 4 you |
Feb 22, 2007, 10:26 pm |
| Sap-Ged--State Farm+ Haag Eng+Agents+Adjusters+ All Pirates |
Agree With Sap-Ged |
Feb 22, 2007, 9:12 pm |
| Kim David sorry you do not understand insurance... |
Ralph Balamabama |
Feb 22, 2007, 2:26 pm |
| Kim David |
Temblor |
Feb 22, 2007, 1:24 pm |
| SF is NOT Leaving!!! |
Mark |
Feb 22, 2007, 1:19 pm |
| RE: Hood is ridiculous |
Want kind of world do you want |
Feb 22, 2007, 12:15 pm |
| RE: RE: robber baron; them's big words for Jim |
Sap-Ged |
Feb 22, 2007, 12:09 pm |
| RE: robber baron; them's big words for Jim |
Tree SAP |
Feb 22, 2007, 12:00 pm |
| RE: How Much Did State Farm Net Before & After Katrina? |
Hope |
Feb 22, 2007, 11:51 am |
| How Much Did State Farm Net Before & After Katrina? |
KIM DAVID |
Feb 22, 2007, 10:12 am |
| To: DDT RE: Kim David |
KIM DAVID |
Feb 22, 2007, 10:03 am |
| Kim David |
DDT |
Feb 22, 2007, 6:51 am |
| RE: RE: A GOOD NEIGHBOR COMPANY- 4 ADVERTISEMENT ONLY |
Not enough to go around |
Feb 21, 2007, 8:40 pm |
| RE: A GOOD NEIGHBOR COMPANY- 4 ADVERTISEMENT ONLY |
Stanley...They R Bad Neighbors |
Feb 21, 2007, 6:03 pm |
| RE: Hawk |
Carrie V. |
Feb 21, 2007, 2:10 pm |
| Hawk |
KIM DAVID |
Feb 21, 2007, 2:08 pm |
| Flood Insurance |
Ralph Balamabama |
Feb 21, 2007, 11:28 am |
| RE: RE: Hood |
Tracey |
Feb 21, 2007, 3:50 am |
| RE: Hood |
Realist |
Feb 20, 2007, 6:11 pm |
| Hood |
David Lockett |
Feb 20, 2007, 3:28 pm |
| Flood Insurance |
FL Agent |
Feb 20, 2007, 3:13 pm |
| Flood Coverage |
Danny Stephenson |
Feb 20, 2007, 2:48 pm |
| RE: Federal Flood Insurance |
Fla Agent |
Feb 20, 2007, 2:25 pm |
| State Farm's Wording |
Temblor |
Feb 20, 2007, 2:13 pm |
| State Farm Agent Emancipation |
Party Time |
Feb 20, 2007, 2:11 pm |
| Mississippi Justice Rules |
Osama Obama (lefty at large) |
Feb 20, 2007, 2:01 pm |
| A GOOD NEIGHBOR COMPANY |
Stanley |
Feb 20, 2007, 1:48 pm |
| RE: Larry |
Larry Lubell |
Feb 20, 2007, 10:37 am |
| Re: Hawk's Policy Wording |
dot_hemath |
Feb 20, 2007, 10:30 am |
| RE: Cherry |
Neo |
Feb 20, 2007, 8:25 am |
| Larry |
Rick |
Feb 20, 2007, 6:22 am |
| Larry Lubell |
Hawk |
Feb 20, 2007, 6:13 am |
| RE: Cherry |
john |
Feb 19, 2007, 10:16 pm |
| State Farm States No New Policies in Mississippi |
Larry Lubell |
Feb 19, 2007, 5:34 pm |
| Mandatory Insurance, Mississippi style |
Gill Fin |
Feb 19, 2007, 3:56 pm |
| To Dean - RE: Cherry |
Mark |
Feb 19, 2007, 1:34 pm |
| robber baron; them's big words for Jim |
chad balaamaba |
Feb 19, 2007, 1:10 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Cherry |
andy |
Feb 19, 2007, 12:19 pm |
| RE: RE: Cherry |
Dean |
Feb 19, 2007, 12:14 pm |
| RE: Cherry |
Andy |
Feb 19, 2007, 11:14 am |
| To: Another Rick |
Hawk |
Feb 19, 2007, 10:47 am |
| Market share |
Another Rick |
Feb 19, 2007, 8:49 am |
| Post of 2/18 6:59pm |
Hawk |
Feb 19, 2007, 6:28 am |
| RE: Robber Baron's ???? |
|
Feb 18, 2007, 6:59 pm |
| RE: Hood is ridiculous |
Farm |
Feb 18, 2007, 6:56 pm |
| Politicians |
Stafford |
Feb 18, 2007, 10:45 am |
| Federal Flood Insurance |
Rick |
Feb 18, 2007, 10:00 am |
| Robber Baron's ???? |
Hawk |
Feb 18, 2007, 9:54 am |
| Hood is ridiculous |
John Crissman |
Feb 18, 2007, 9:01 am |
| Insurance commissioner |
john |
Feb 17, 2007, 1:26 pm |
| RE: Cherry |
Melanie |
Feb 17, 2007, 11:41 am |
| Legal Points versus Justice |
Dean |
Feb 17, 2007, 8:40 am |
| Cherry |
steve |
Feb 17, 2007, 8:20 am |
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article