Oklahoma Schools Destroyed by Tornado Lacked ‘Safe Rooms’
Connecticut Court Rules That Lawyers Can’t Be Sued for Fraud
Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
E&O Insights: Restaurant and Tavern Risks
CEA’s First CIO Reflects C-Suite Trend
Golf and Country Clubs Weather the Storm
Midwest AGs Go After Storm-Chasing Roofing CompaniesFree Newsletters
Sign up to receive insurance news alerts!Most Popular
Current Issue
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
Why would a company pay a claim for a death that took place 2 months before the policy was in force?
Typically, the IJ article misses important stuff, such as this from the The Atlanta Journal-Constitution:
“When she submitted a claim, she used altered documents — including police reports and a death certificate — to show that her son died in April 2003, authorities said.”
She might only end up with just 5 years probabtion. That almost makes it worth the risk!
What about the signature? Was this accepted online? Did she cross-dress to look like her son? Was identification never requested? Did an agent take the application?
There is just so much information missing from this article. How did she get away with getting the applications submitted for it to be issued?
Or have I missed something?
Wow! She must be trying to compete with Casey Anthony for mother of the year.