Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
E&O Insights: Restaurant and Tavern Risks
CEA’s First CIO Reflects C-Suite Trend
Golf and Country Clubs Weather the Storm
Midwest AGs Go After Storm-Chasing Roofing Companies
Medical Malpractice Payouts Not Driving Up Health Costs: Study
Florida Lawmakers Approve Medical Malpractice Reform
Industry Results Show Positive Signs for Workers’ Comp Line, NCCI’s Chief Economist SaysFree Newsletters
Sign up to receive insurance news alerts!Most Popular
Current Issue
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
Wow! Crime really does pay! I guess he’ll be the hit of the jail with his canteen account bursting at the seams…
They may have reached a premature settlement on the life ins dispute, but she should sue him for $20M for wrongful death.
There are 3 sides to every story, without knowing the full details of this I cannot say if I agree with the judgment or not. I am willing to bet that the 203,000 that Larkin received is more than likely already spent. They can sue him but he may have nothing in the way of assets, if he did I am sure that he had time to sell it all before his conviction. They could be saving her a lot of heartache and trying to encourage her to move on and he happy. One never knows.
I agree with you. It probably was spent on lawyers.
as usual, the lawyers get most of it f not all. If she sue’s the lawyes will surely then get what is left. Larkin hould pay for lawyer!
Some things simply boggle the mind….
How did anyone manage to make a deal on life insurance proceeds? The beneficiaries are clearly stated. If the court wants to make a decision based on law rather than personal preference, then the husband cannot be allowed to keep any of the funds.
For goodness sakes! She was eleven years old when it happened and only 14 when she settled….where are child protective services??? Couldn’t the courts overturn based on that plus the obvious screw up by law inforcement?