Travelers Insurance Says Policy Excludes Trayvon Martin’s Mother’s Claim

By Mike Schneider | August 8, 2012

  • August 8, 2012 at 1:32 pm
    ga agent says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 13
    Thumb down 0

    “The insurer issued its year-long policy to the gated community, Retreat at Twin Lakes, on March 30. Martin was shot about a month earlier on Feb. 26.”

    Would this have not occurred before the policy was effective? Am I mising something here?

    • August 8, 2012 at 7:01 pm
      Bob says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 2
      Thumb down 1

      My understanding is that the policy in question was a D&O which is typically issued on a claims made basis with a retro date.

  • August 8, 2012 at 1:34 pm
    fl girl says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 6
    Thumb down 0

    sure seems strange that they purchased a policy after the incident. shouldn’t they have had one in place all along?

  • August 8, 2012 at 1:39 pm
    Just guessing says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 16
    Thumb down 1

    They don’t say when it was effective, so it may have just issued late. What’s interesting to me is an association with a bodily injury exclusion – what? Who would sell an association a liability policy with a bodily injury exclusion?

    In a gated community there are typically common areas which would require liability coverage.

    • August 8, 2012 at 2:53 pm
      Bill says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 10
      Thumb down 1

      I agree on the bodily injury exclusion. Isn’t that the reason the homeowners associaton would want the policy in the first place? What if someone gets injured in the pool or some other common area?

  • August 8, 2012 at 1:48 pm
    Captain Planet says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 5
    Thumb down 13

    Someone who knows George Zimmerman and the fact he is neighborhood watch – sorry, couldn’t resist.

    • August 9, 2012 at 8:45 am
      Ralph Kramden says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 4
      Thumb down 2

      Captain Planet–next time, please resist. I’m hoping you aren’t really as big of an jerk as you make yourself sound in your posts.

  • August 8, 2012 at 2:07 pm
    KB says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 9
    Thumb down 0

    Aren’t they referring to a D&O policy? They always have exclusions for bodily injury claims.

  • August 8, 2012 at 2:12 pm
    boonedoggle says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 6
    Thumb down 3

    The liability portion of the individual homeowner/condo owner’s policies should provide coverage for any claims of negligent entrustment, regarding selecting Zimmerman as their roving armed guardian.. Prudent claim handling migh suggest putting forth some settlement money now to avoid the circus and defense costs of potential protracted litigation.

    • August 8, 2012 at 4:07 pm
      FloridaAgent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 5
      Thumb down 0

      Rock Hill writes the GL and has already offered policy limits ($1M).

  • August 8, 2012 at 2:17 pm
    carla says:
    Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 12
    Thumb down 32

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

    • August 8, 2012 at 4:06 pm
      FloridaAgent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 2
      Thumb down 0

      Rock Hill write the GL and has already offered policy limits.

    • August 8, 2012 at 7:08 pm
      Bob says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 8
      Thumb down 1

      I feel sorry for the parents loss of a child but based on what I have seen thus far in the media if this goes down as Zimmerman was standing his ground and a justified homicide it will be interesting to see if they can find liability. I understand that the HOA policy has offered limits but do not see why until it is determined that the HOA failed to meet it’s obligations.

      I have heard conflicting stories about if Zimmerman was acting on behalf of the association or as an individual.
      Time will tell what the whole story is.

  • August 8, 2012 at 2:43 pm
    FloridaAgent says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 12
    Thumb down 1

    I know what happened here first hand. The idiot attorney filed suit on the D&O policy which excludes BI in favor of the GL policy. Travelers writes the D&O, not the GL. GL is with another carrier and does cover BI. Really. Some of the comments on here are, well, retarded. Stupid is as stupid does. Now go sell something

  • August 8, 2012 at 3:24 pm
    Poorly Written says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 5
    Thumb down 0

    This is a poorly written article. The author could have added in what type of policy the association had with Travelers. Travelers is asking to not even defend it. I think it is a D&O policy (guessing). I would not offer one cent to settle if I am in turn asking to not even defend the association.

    There is another policy out there somewhere that would cover some of the liability. Travelers is also likely the carrier on the liability policy.

    • August 8, 2012 at 4:02 pm
      FloridaAgent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 3
      Thumb down 0

      It is in fact a Travelers D&O. Rock Hill writes the GL

  • August 8, 2012 at 6:30 pm
    Ellie says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 7
    Thumb down 0

    FloridaAgent can’t say it enough, apparently no one is listening.
    Right on FloridaAgent…

  • August 8, 2012 at 6:34 pm
    Another FL Agent says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 1
    Thumb down 0

    Sensational headlines !!! Even in the “Insurance Journal”.
    I am very very disappointed in the magazine. NO mention that the policy type (D&O) would always normally exclude such an exposure.
    No mention that the GL has already offered up Policy limits.
    NOT much RESEARCH prior to writing the article.
    It even got emotional reactions HERE, where you would usually expect insurance professionals to ask for the “rest of the story”.
    The Journal did itself no favors with this article, and will certainly make me question what else I might read here.

  • August 8, 2012 at 10:37 pm
    JAMES says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 18
    Thumb down 4

    Yes, the really stupidest comment is “75,000 is not enough.” What if Trayvon was the instigator? Then someone should be suing HIS family.

  • August 9, 2012 at 8:13 am
    Jacob S. says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 4
    Thumb down 0

    I’m waiting for FloridaAgent to weigh in on this one until I make any comments…

    • August 9, 2012 at 4:31 pm
      Hillsborough agent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 6
      Thumb down 0

      I don’t want to speak for him but if I did he would say: “Travelers had a D&O policy. Rock Hill had the GL and has already offered policy limits.”

      Again, I don’t want to put words in his mouth but I think he would approve of that statement.

  • August 9, 2012 at 8:29 am
    Marsha says:
    Hot debate. What do you think?
    Thumb up 23
    Thumb down 22

    I’m waiting for more information from the trial, but I don’t understand how “stand your ground” could apply to a man who was following a kid. I’m sure the kid was scared knowing a man was following him. It seems to me Trayvon was the one who was “standing his ground”. Even if Trayvon started the fight, Zimmerman was the instigator by following someone after dark, especially since he was expressly told not to by the 911 operator.

    • August 13, 2012 at 10:35 am
      TxLady says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 8
      Thumb down 1

      I am a little confused when you say ‘following a kid’. Anyone over 6 feet, wearing a hoodie on a rainy night is not going to look like a kid, but a full grown adult. Perhaps you’ve been looking at the well circulated pictures of Trayvon from his youth football days, taken years earlier versus the recent pics of him. Only time will tell what happens with this, but calling Trayvon a kid, implicating child, is really a stretch.

  • August 9, 2012 at 10:49 am
    judy says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 1
    Thumb down 1

    The article is not accurately titled when only 2 sentences of the article has to do with Travelers and insurance coverage issues.

  • August 9, 2012 at 11:42 am
    smokedsalmoned says:
    Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 11
    Thumb down 30

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

  • August 9, 2012 at 11:43 am
    smokedsalmoned says:
    Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 7
    Thumb down 28

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

  • August 9, 2012 at 11:50 am
    smokedsalmoned says:
    Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 7
    Thumb down 24

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

  • August 9, 2012 at 12:30 pm
    smokedsalmoned says:
    Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 3
    Thumb down 20

    Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

  • August 9, 2012 at 1:32 pm
    Shari says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 20
    Thumb down 0

    Smoked Salmon – what have any of your posts got to do with this article? Find another forum to post in.

  • August 9, 2012 at 1:37 pm
    Shari says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 5
    Thumb down 0

    As to FloridaAgent’s point about the idiot attorney filing against the D&O, generally the attorneys file against the defendant and the defendant presents the suit to their insurance carriers. To be safe the HOA may have sent the suit papers to their GL carrier and to the D&O carrier or their agent(s) may have. Travelers is just stating the obvious – no coverage under our D&O policy

  • August 9, 2012 at 5:14 pm
    Just guessing says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 4
    Thumb down 0

    they should have stated it was a D&O policy. I assumed GL, because, well….that’s where it would make sense to file a claim.

  • August 9, 2012 at 7:41 pm
    JAMES says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 5
    Thumb down 1

    Marsha – you weren’t there. How the heck do you know exactly what happened? A phone call is not video.

  • August 13, 2012 at 1:39 pm
    John Scrader says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 1
    Thumb down 0

    Unless Zimmerman is/was on the board of directors or under direction of the board of directors, they have no valid claim. Personally if i was the opposing attorney i would filed under gl, but the opposing attorney appears to be a dumba@@@.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features