Oklahoma Schools Destroyed by Tornado Lacked ‘Safe Rooms’
Connecticut Court Rules That Lawyers Can’t Be Sued for Fraud
Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
E&O Insights: Restaurant and Tavern Risks
CEA’s First CIO Reflects C-Suite Trend
Golf and Country Clubs Weather the Storm
Midwest AGs Go After Storm-Chasing Roofing CompaniesFree Newsletters
Sign up to receive insurance news alerts!Most Popular
Current Issue
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
It does the heart good when the system works.
“But mommy, I don’t want to wear this neck brace. It’s ugly and the other kids laugh.”
“There, there, mija. Let’s just add these Hello Kitty stickers, and see? It looks much better!”
There should be an additional penalty for involving the children, who may or may not now be a part of the foster-care system. Shame!
It is good to see the system work.
And people complain about the cost of insurance. Even in “wins” such as this the insurer still assumes significant costs in defending their stake. These women should be forced to reimburse the insurers for any costs they incurred in this fraud and any injury or damage to others should come out of these women’s pockets. But I’m sure they have none.
Justice!
How about endangering the lives of a minor?
were any Dad’s involved or did the women even know who the “Dad’s” were???