West News
Judge Tosses Insurance Company's Lawsuit Against Robert De Niro
March 13, 2008
A California judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed against Robert De Niro by an insurance company that claimed he misrepresented his health for a movie role.
Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. insured the film "Hide and Seek." The company claimed the actor misrepresented his health when he wrote that he had never been diagnosed with or treated for prostate cancer.
According to court documents, De Niro was diagnosed with prostate cancer on Oct. 15, 2003, two days after he signed the medical certificate. De Niro underwent a prostate-gland biopsy on Oct. 10, 2003.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Rolf M. Treu granted De Niro's motion for summary judgment.
This ruling vindicates what we've said all along," De Niro's attorney Robyn Crowther said. "We are pleased that the court has found that Fireman's Fund can't sue Mr. De Niro for getting cancer."
De Niro's diagnosis and resulting treatment delayed the movie production. Fireman's Fund paid Fox more than $1.8 million to cover the cost of the delay. The film was released in January 2005.
Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article
| Subject |
Posted By |
Posted On |
| RE: RE: can't sue Mr. De Niro for getting cancer |
really now |
Mar 17, 2008, 11:50 am |
| RE: can't sue Mr. De Niro for getting cancer |
Dick |
Mar 14, 2008, 2:18 pm |
| can't sue Mr. De Niro for getting cancer |
DeNiro Fan |
Mar 14, 2008, 2:05 pm |
| RE: Against the Grain |
JSW |
Mar 14, 2008, 11:22 am |
| RE: Phuck Dinero!!!!! |
Dustin |
Mar 13, 2008, 3:27 pm |
| Phuck Dinero!!!!! |
Ralph |
Mar 13, 2008, 3:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Must be a fan of De Niro |
lastbat |
Mar 13, 2008, 3:20 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Must be a fan of De Niro |
County Line |
Mar 13, 2008, 2:50 pm |
| Bad Movie |
Dakota Fanning |
Mar 13, 2008, 2:41 pm |
| RE: RE: Is a biopsy |
click chick |
Mar 13, 2008, 2:38 pm |
| RE: RE: Against the grain |
ad |
Mar 13, 2008, 2:29 pm |
| RE: Against the grain |
anon the mouse |
Mar 13, 2008, 2:20 pm |
| Against the grain |
Dustin |
Mar 13, 2008, 2:03 pm |
| RE: RE: Must be a fan of De Niro |
Obvious |
Mar 13, 2008, 1:55 pm |
| RE: Is a biopsy |
ad |
Mar 13, 2008, 1:48 pm |
| Is a biopsy |
Dustin |
Mar 13, 2008, 1:44 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Must be a fan of De Niro |
Cathy |
Mar 13, 2008, 1:28 pm |
| RE: RE: Must be a fan of De Niro |
caffiend |
Mar 13, 2008, 1:22 pm |
| What a pity |
Another bad decision |
Mar 13, 2008, 1:00 pm |
| RE: Must be a fan of De Niro |
justice |
Mar 13, 2008, 12:59 pm |
| classic |
Casual Observer |
Mar 13, 2008, 12:51 pm |
| Must be a fan of De Niro |
Patriot |
Mar 13, 2008, 12:45 pm |
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article