The New Mexico House rejected a proposal that would have required owners of dangerous dogs to obtain liability insurance to cover damages or injuries caused by the animals.
The legislation, HB667, would have updated a law enacted in 2005 to protect New Mexicans from dogs determined to be dangerous or potentially dangerous.
Opponents objected to a proposal that would have forced owners of dangerous dogs to have $100,000 worth of liability insurance. They expressed doubts that some owners would buy the insurance coverage.
Rep. Don Tripp, R-Socorro, said the owners of dangerous dogs were the problem.
“Maybe we should put some of them on a leash. I think that it would be more effective,” said Tripp.
Supporters said dog owners should be held liable for the actions of their animals.
Rep. Kathy McCoy, R-Cedar Crest, said the legislation would “send a message to irresponsible animal owners that they must take responsible for these dangerous dogs.”
The bill failed 34-31.
Gina says: 
Brokette says: 
Emperor Bush says: 
Daredevil CEOs May Put Companies at Risk
California Independent Contractor Law May Be Liability for Agents, Brokers
North Carolina Continues Auto Regulation Debate As Rates Stay Same for 2012
Long-time California Lobbyist Looks to 2012 Legislation Affecting Insurance
Mine Safety Chief Seeks to End Complacency Over Safety
Virginia Court Grants Rehearing of Global Warming Claims Case
Woman Takes Honda to Small-Claims, Wins Big
Federal Insurance Office Says Overdue Regulation Report Still Weeks Away
