California Commissioner Please With Proposed Office of National Insurance

June 18, 2009

Separate emails using a comma.

California Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner generally seems pleased the President Obama has proposed an Office of National Insurance without creating a federal regulator.

“The administration’s plan avoids the trap of creating a federal insurance regulator, which I have consistently opposed,” Poizner said in a statement. “It appropriately acknowledges the primary role the states play in regulating the insurance business to benefit consumers. State oversight of insurance companies, coordinated among all state regulators, is the reason that, among all the financial players in this country, it is the insurers who are and remain the most stable and the least in need of federal assistance.

“The plan also accepts that the insurance business is integrated into the larger, global financial landscape, and plays a role in the financial planning of most Americans,” he continued. “Those of us who regulate insurance at the state level want to share our knowledge and experience with the federal government, so that, together, we can prevent the kind of meltdown that the banking and investment sectors have exposed the entire world to. I am ready to work collaboratively to ensure the stability of all these integrated industries. ”

Commissioner Poizner has been an opponent of letting insurance companies choose their regulators. In April, he opposed the Royce-Bean legislation that provides for an optional federal charter for insurers and insurance producers. In addition, as the host Commissioner for the National Association of Insurance Commissioners conference in March in San Diego, Commissioner Poizner urged the state insurance regulators to be active in the fight against the optional federal charter.

Source: CDI

Separate emails using a comma.
Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • June 18, 2009 at 1:38 am
    Skeptic says:
    Can't imagine why...well, maybe it has something to do with Pelosi, Boxer and the fact that the State is broke and looking to the Feds for a bailout. Let's say you're the High... read more
  • June 18, 2009 at 12:30 pm
    pita says:
    Please or Pleased? Sad that this was missed in proof reading. Where do I send my invoice for catching this error?
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features