Free Newsletters
Most Popular
- Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
- GOP Questions Fundraising for Obamacare
- ‘Major Disaster’ Declared in Wake of Deadly Oklahoma Tornadoes
- Brokerage Firm Fined $9M for Email Violations, Misstatements
- Opioid Epidemic Plagues Workers’ Comp
- On a Leash: Dog Bite Insurance Claim Trends
- 50 Top Apps for Independent Agents
- 10 Things to Know About the Trucking Industry
- Montana Man Deliberately Crashes Into Insurance Office
- Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
- House Farm Bill Expands Crop Insurance, Cuts Food StampsMay 16, 2013 | Comments (28)
- GOP Questions Fundraising for ObamacareMay 21, 2013 | Comments (23)
- Montana Man Deliberately Crashes Into Insurance OfficeMay 17, 2013 | Comments (13)
- Will Supreme Court Enter Climate Change Debate?May 16, 2013 | Comments (12)
- Oregon City Employee Suing Over Co-Worker ScentMay 16, 2013 | Comments (9)
Current Issue
Partner Center
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
Quote of Note
The Maryland Insurance Administration supported the measure, in part because the agency was receiving complaints about anti-concurrent causation clauses being used more often and in a more expansive manner.
More QuotesMaryland Insurance Administration spokesperson Vivian Laxton

Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
E&O Insights: Restaurant and Tavern Risks
CEA’s First CIO Reflects C-Suite Trend
Golf and Country Clubs Weather the Storm
Midwest AGs Go After Storm-Chasing Roofing Companies
Medical Malpractice Payouts Not Driving Up Health Costs: Study
Florida Lawmakers Approve Medical Malpractice Reform
Industry Results Show Positive Signs for Workers’ Comp Line, NCCI’s Chief Economist Says



“the boy experienced “great physical agony, pain and suffering in the knowledge of impending death, emotional distress … as well as the knowledge that he would never see his mother, father and brother again” I wonder how they knew that?
The phsyiological effects of drowning are very well documented. It’s not that difficult to make that statement.
Otherwise, we wouldn’t have waterboarding as an “interrogation” technique.
That being said, much of the plaintiff attorney’s argument is highly embellished to “prep” the intended audience.
I feel for their loss. But unless you keep your kid under lock and key, accidents will happen.
being and eagle scout and cubmaster, BSA has always had strong safety record. things can happen and we know that it can be stressing to lose a family member. but to think what he thinks, is only a speculation, because you have no way to prove or show it… my heart goes out to the family… but remember scouting is not a profitable organization and does wonders for kids and encouraging growth in a variety of traits…
Two of my friends are Life Scouts and co-Scout Masters of their troop. They are the most ethical and moral people I have ever met. Their troop tends to end up with more than their fair share of troubled kids–and manages to turn them into upstanding citizens, Eagle Scouts, and in at least one occurrance–a Navy Seal. That being said–I don’t think people are demonizing the organization as a whole.
A boy died in a 15′ deep roped off area while under the care of a scout scuba instructor. That should not have happened. They certainly have a case for negligence in this respect.
This is why we can’t have nice things.