Oklahoma Schools Destroyed by Tornado Lacked ‘Safe Rooms’
Connecticut Court Rules That Lawyers Can’t Be Sued for Fraud
Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
E&O Insights: Restaurant and Tavern Risks
CEA’s First CIO Reflects C-Suite Trend
Golf and Country Clubs Weather the Storm
Midwest AGs Go After Storm-Chasing Roofing CompaniesFree Newsletters
Sign up to receive insurance news alerts!Most Popular
Current Issue
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
Shouldn’t those who suffered the damages be the ones to receive all of the $1.5mil fine? It would be more equitable to disburse it to them in proportion to their premium refunds than giving The State a hefty jackpot.
Agreed…and Im pretty sure when these enforcements happen, the insured is given his share.
Great job by the CDI, now we need the Insurance commissioner in Nv. check out Travlers!!!!! thats wishfull thinking !!!!
@County Line: The state performed the investigation, spent the man hours and returned premiums to ‘wronged’ consumers – making them whole. Giving the insured’s the ‘jackpot’ (of fines) as you call it – is even less equitable than allowing the state to keep it. There is no end to fraudulent creativity when consumers view their insurance policies as potential Lottery tickets. Let’s not open that door any further.