California Court Reinstates Lawsuit Against Glock

July 27, 2012

A California appeals court has reinstated a now-retired paralyzed Los Angeles police officer’s product liability lawsuit against gun manufacturer Glock.

Enrique Chavez was paralyzed from the waist down when his 3-year-old son accidentally shot him with his service pistol.

The lawsuit claims the .45-caliber Glock 21 pistol lacks adequate safeguards against accidental discharge.

The Glock has no grip safety, a device attached to the pistol grip that the shooter must deactivate before firing.

A Los Angeles judge dismissed the suit two years ago, saying a Police Department review of the gun’s design found the Glock’s advantages outweighed any inherent risks.

The San Francisco Chronicle reported the 2nd District Court of Appeals on Tuesday reinstated the suit, saying a jury could conclude that a grip safety strong enough to withstand a child’s grasp would minimize the risk of accidental discharge.

Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • August 3, 2012 at 5:04 pm
    Jon says:
    That's incredibly ignorant and unfounded.
  • August 3, 2012 at 2:19 pm
    Santa says:
    As a gun owner for over 25 years, I am so tired of those who place blame where it does not belong. When my children were very young, I showed them an NRA film on gun safety, ... read more
  • July 31, 2012 at 2:43 pm
    Chris says:
    The Glock has a trigger safety so that the weapon doesn't fire unless someone pulls the trigger. The amount of strength necessary to pull the trigger while holding the weapon ... read more
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features