Free Newsletters
Most Popular
- Wage and Hour Claims Among Top Threats to U.S. Employers
- GOP Questions Fundraising for Obamacare
- ‘Major Disaster’ Declared in Wake of Deadly Oklahoma Tornadoes
- Brokerage Firm Fined $9M for Email Violations, Misstatements
- Opioid Epidemic Plagues Workers’ Comp
- On a Leash: Dog Bite Insurance Claim Trends
- 50 Top Apps for Independent Agents
- 10 Things to Know About the Trucking Industry
- Montana Man Deliberately Crashes Into Insurance Office
- Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
- House Farm Bill Expands Crop Insurance, Cuts Food StampsMay 16, 2013 | Comments (28)
- GOP Questions Fundraising for ObamacareMay 21, 2013 | Comments (23)
- Montana Man Deliberately Crashes Into Insurance OfficeMay 17, 2013 | Comments (13)
- Will Supreme Court Enter Climate Change Debate?May 16, 2013 | Comments (12)
- Oregon City Employee Suing Over Co-Worker ScentMay 16, 2013 | Comments (9)
Current Issue
Partner Center
Editors and Contributors
-
Andrea WellsAgency Compensation Playbook: 2013 Agency Salary Survey -
Andrew G. SimpsonHow Process Improvement Drives Agency Profitability -
Stephanie JonesThe Acquisition Cycle -
Don JerglerIndustry Predictions -
Chris BurandReasonable Compensation -
Andrea WellsPersonal Lines: How Technology is Changing the Way Agents Do Business
Quote of Note
I don't think the votes are there to confirm her.
More QuotesState Sen. Bob Deuell R-Greenville on the odds that the Texas Senate will confirm the appointment of Insurance Commissioner Eleanor Kitzman. Some senators have questioned her leadership and ties to the insurance industry.

Cyber Attacks On Banks More Serious Than Public Realizes
E&O Insights: Restaurant and Tavern Risks
CEA’s First CIO Reflects C-Suite Trend
Golf and Country Clubs Weather the Storm
Midwest AGs Go After Storm-Chasing Roofing Companies
Medical Malpractice Payouts Not Driving Up Health Costs: Study
Florida Lawmakers Approve Medical Malpractice Reform
Industry Results Show Positive Signs for Workers’ Comp Line, NCCI’s Chief Economist Says



Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Most date rape drugs impair the victims faculties, but do not in themselves render someone unconscious.
I had two friends who were “roofied” in college. Neither passed out. One was able to hold it together long enough to get out of the house (frat) party. The other, unfortunately, was not.
Date rape drugs do not increase your BAC.
That should be relatively easy to prove too much alcohol in a DUI charge.
The downside of most date rape drugs is they break down incredibly quickly and are very hard to prove if the victim is examined too long after the fact.
The rest of your commentary is, quite frankly, disgusting and ill-considered.
Jon,
Thank you for the lesson on the date rape drugs. I have had no encounters with them so I that is why I said “I believe” as I was not sure.
As for my other part of the comment, I was just making a joke. You people need to lighten up a little.
Sorry Compman, but to anyone with any personal experience with the after effects–it’s not any kind of joking matter.
I bet your a blast at the company party too.
@Compman:
I couldn’t say, my company doesn’t spring for parties.
I agree with Compman up to the “if she is ugly” — had the individual been given the date rape drug, she should not have been able to get into her car and drive. And unless someone was physically attacking her, there would appear to be no reason to do so. My opinion is that this individual is just one more person who is unwilling to take responsibility for her own choices.
Incorrect. See my above response.
While I agree she should be given an award for her creativity if that’s how it shakes out, understand date rape drugs do not always “knock a person out” – at least not immediately. My neice was given one at a bar w/o her knowledge, felt very “weird” and friends took her home where she fell asleep later. Just an FYI….
Bunch of pathetic men out there who have to drug women so they might have a shot at getting laid.
No kidding. Is a Hooker any cheaper then the date rape stuff? Hooker has to be the better option – cant rape the willing.
And, you probably get more bang for your buck! Sorry, had to be done. Try the veal and tip your servers.
It’s truly difficult to know when a rape drug is slipped into your drink. That’s why DrinkSavvy is developing cups, straws, and glassware that will immediately change color to warn you if a drug is slipped into your drink. To learn more and to get our products before anyone else, visit our campaign at http://www.IndieGoGo.com/DrinkSavvy.
Good to know.
Jon was sorta right. Checking the BAC should be easy. He was wrong however, in stating that “unfortunately, most date rape drugs are broken down very quickly”
Flunitrazepam aka Rohypnol aka Roofies = half-life in blood stream 18-26 hours
GHB = half life 30-60 minutes, however its metabolites last much longer. Also, GHB uses the same enzymes as alcohol for breakdown, so any combination of the two will cause it to be present for longer periods.
Virtually any benzodiazepine will be detectable for many days as they are poorly water soluble, so your valium/xanax/etc will also be easily detectable.
The real problem this brings up though, is the possibility of this woman actually taking say xanax, and then drinking and driving. Now instead of getting the book thrown at her, she could claim she was drugged.
Rohypnol’s effects last for 8-24 hours. Most experts state that you have a 24 hour window for actionable test results.
GHB is only detectible in urine tests within 8-12 hours. It is not detectible using over-the-counter urine tests. The duration is 1-3 hours, and in high enough (or repetitive) doses can induce unconsciousness. GHB is also a naturally occurring chemical within the body which makes detecting someone being doped with GHB more difficult.
It *can* be confirmed if you test the victims hair follicles–that is, if your police dept. has that kind of resources or even inclination to test.
Sexual assault cases are some of the least crime-against-another cases brought to trial.
So while I was less factually overt in my initial post (this is an insurance industry forum, after all) I am still correct.