California Top Court to Decide on Retailer Defibrillator Issue

By | May 7, 2014

  • May 7, 2014 at 2:10 pm
    New Bob says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Only in the peoples republic of California would such a stupid claim even make it to the supreme court. It would have been nice if Target had these devices just like it would be nice for them to give me my cart full of goods for free. If you feel that a store must have a ED and they don’t then shop somewhere that does.

  • May 7, 2014 at 2:14 pm
    P/L Underwriter says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Lets see…a 16 year old in their first job holds my life in their hands…nope, I’m not getting the warm fuzzies. A part-time store clerk or full-time Target manager shoule not be responsible for any more than dialing 911.

  • May 7, 2014 at 2:42 pm
    jim says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Maybe the family ought to sue the family member’s life insurance agent for not having enough life insurance. Oops, did he,she,it, have any? If not, sue the estate for failure to adequately provide for the family. Target might also require registration for anyone shopping there who may be at risk for heart attack with a disclaimer if they don’t sign up. Same brilliant (CA) rationale.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*