<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Insurance Journal &#187; Government Accountability Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/topics/government-accountability-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com</link>
	<description>Insurance Journal delivers the latest business news for the Property/Casualty insurance industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:59:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Government Adds Climate Change, Weather Data Gaps to &#8216;High Risk&#8217; List</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2013/02/14/281241.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change U.S. government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAO flood insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAO high risk lsit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Accountability Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government high risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research and Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=281241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Climate change and gaps in weather satellite data have been officially added to the list of high risks facing the federal government, a list that already includes the federal flood insurance program, Medicare and the Post Office. The Government Accountability &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2013/02/14/281241.htm">U.S. Government Adds Climate Change, Weather Data Gaps to &#8216;High Risk&#8217; List</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Watchdog Issues Report on Gas Pipeline Safety</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2013/01/25/278793.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia Gas Transmission Sissonville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas pipeline safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Accountability Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research and Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia natural gas explosion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=278793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Federal regulators must account for response times in the data they collect from transmission operators on natural gas pipeline incidents, a congressional watchdog agency said this week. The U.S. Government Accountability Office said in a report that the Pipeline and &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2013/01/25/278793.htm">Federal Watchdog Issues Report on Gas Pipeline Safety</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Safety Incentives Discourage Workers from Reporting Injuries?</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/05/10/247088.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew G. Simpson</dc:creator>				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Accountability Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injury reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupational Safety and Health Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research and Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=247088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Many employers are in the dark over whether their safety incentive programs encourage or discourage the reporting of injuries and illnesses by their employees, or if they have no effect. But a new report says employers, and the federal officials &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/05/10/247088.htm">Do Safety Incentives Discourage Workers from Reporting Injuries?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Risk Retention Law Needs Clarification: Congressional Report</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/01/10/230537.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew G. Simpson</dc:creator>				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional report on RRGs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Accountability Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liability Risk Retention Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Risk Retention Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research and Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk retention groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RRG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RRGs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state regulation of RRGs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=230537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The federal law governing risk retention groups should be clarified to reduce the number of disagreements between RRG managers and state regulators and to clarify the coverage RRGs may offer, a Congressional report advises. The Government Accountability Office said varying &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/01/10/230537.htm">Federal Risk Retention Law Needs Clarification: Congressional Report</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/13 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 459/525 objects using memcached

 Served from: www.insurancejournal.com @ 2013-05-24 03:28:03 by W3 Total Cache -->