<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Insurance Journal &#187; individual mandate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/topics/individual-mandate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com</link>
	<description>Insurance Journal delivers the latest business news for the Property/Casualty insurance industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:45:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IRS Says It Has No Role in Enforcing Health Insurance Mandate</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/09/12/262776.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Dixon</dc:creator>				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal healthcare law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=262776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Internal Revenue Service on Tuesday assured congressional lawmakers that agents would play no role in enforcing the controversial requirement that Americans buy insurance under President Barack Obama&#8217;s healthcare overhaul. &#8220;IRS revenue agents will not be involved. There will not &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/09/12/262776.htm">IRS Says It Has No Role in Enforcing Health Insurance Mandate</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chief Justice Roberts Viewed Differently After Healthcare Opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/07/03/254275.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice John Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=254275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Chief Justice John Roberts could have taken down the entire, massive healthcare law that his fellow Republicans deride as &#8220;Obamacare.&#8221; He could have prevented the Supreme Court decision that largely disabled the most disputed aspects of Arizona&#8217;s crackdown on illegal &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/07/03/254275.htm">Chief Justice Roberts Viewed Differently After Healthcare Opinion</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<enclosure url="http://www.insurancejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/justice-john-roberts-715x1024.jpg" length="124505" type="image/jpeg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Actuaries Say Individual Mandate Key to Viable Health Insurance Market</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/06/29/253696.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Academy of Actuaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance marketplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=253696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling to keep the Affordable Care Act largely intact is a step toward ensuring that health insurance markets attract a broad cross section of risk, a cornerstone to any viable health insurance market, according to insurance &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/06/29/253696.htm">Actuaries Say Individual Mandate Key to Viable Health Insurance Market</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Chief Justice Roberts Saved Obama&#8217;s Healthcare Law</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/06/29/253671.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice John Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court healthcare decision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=253671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the end, it all came down to Chief Justice John Roberts, the sphinx in the center chair, who in a stunning decision wove together competing rationales to uphold President Barack Obama&#8217;s healthcare plan. Roberts&#8217; action instantly upended the conventional &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/06/29/253671.htm">Why Chief Justice Roberts Saved Obama&#8217;s Healthcare Law</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to Deliver Obama Healthcare Ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/06/28/253419.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Vicini</dc:creator>				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=253419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Supreme Court is set to deliver on Thursday its ruling on President Barack Obama&#8217;s 2010 healthcare overhaul, his signature domestic policy achievement, in a historic case that could hand him a huge triumph or a stinging rebuke just &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/06/28/253419.htm">Supreme Court to Deliver Obama Healthcare Ruling</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Hears More Healthcare Law Arguments</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/03/28/241028.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=241028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The fate of President Barack Obama&#8217;s healthcare overhaul will be on the line on Wednesday when the U.S. Supreme Court considers whether the entire law must fall without its centerpiece insurance mandate. Completing three days of historic arguments, the nine &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/03/28/241028.htm">Supreme Court Hears More Healthcare Law Arguments</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Begins Healthcare Law Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/03/26/240705.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=240705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two years after President Barack Obama signed into law a healthcare overhaul, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday took up a historic test of whether it is valid under the country&#8217;s Constitution. The sweeping law intended to transform healthcare for &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/03/26/240705.htm">Supreme Court Begins Healthcare Law Debate</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 Ways Supreme Court Could Rule on Healthcare Law</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/03/21/240239.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 03:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=240239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court has several options in ruling on President Barack Obama&#8217;s health care overhaul, from upholding the law to striking it down in its entirety. The court also could avoid deciding the law&#8217;s constitutionality at all, if it finds &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/03/21/240239.htm">6 Ways Supreme Court Could Rule on Healthcare Law</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 GOP-Appointed Justices Control Obama Health Law&#8217;s Fate</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/03/20/240057.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sherman</dc:creator>				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal healthcare law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=240057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a thought that can&#8217;t comfort President Barack Obama: The fate of his health care overhaul rests with four Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices. His most sweeping domestic achievement could be struck down if they stand together with Justice Clarence Thomas, &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/03/20/240057.htm">4 GOP-Appointed Justices Control Obama Health Law&#8217;s Fate</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Readies for Healthcare Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/03/19/239951.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=239951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Death, taxes and now health insurance? Having a medical plan or else paying a fine is about to become another certainty of American life, unless the Supreme Court says no. People are split over the wisdom of President Barack Obama&#8217;s &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/03/19/239951.htm">Supreme Court Readies for Healthcare Debate</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>RAND Study: Ending Individual Mandate Would Cut Coverage, Hike Government&#8217;s Costs</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/02/21/236434.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commonwealth Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of eliminating individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal healthcare law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAND Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research and Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=236434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Eliminating the federal mandate in the new healthcare law that every individual carry health insurance would sharply lower the number of people gaining coverage, but would not dramatically increase the cost of buying policies through new insurance exchanges, a new &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/02/21/236434.htm">RAND Study: Ending Individual Mandate Would Cut Coverage, Hike Government&#8217;s Costs</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mass. AG Coakley Heading to D.C. to Make Case for Health Care Law</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/east/2012/02/07/234487.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[East News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=234487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Attorney General Martha Coakley is heading to Washington to make a legal case for the national health care law that was modeled after Massachusetts&#8217; own landmark 2006 health care law. On Thursday Coakley will defend the constitutionality of the national &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/east/2012/02/07/234487.htm">Mass. AG Coakley Heading to D.C. to Make Case for Health Care Law</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Healthcare Individual Mandate Too Weak to Matter, Aetna CEO Says</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/01/19/231693.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aetna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court on healthcare law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=231693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Wall Street&#8217;s concern about the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s looming decision on President Obama&#8217;s healthcare overhaul is overblown because the provision at the heart of the law already has little teeth, the top executive at Aetna Inc. said. The court in &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/01/19/231693.htm">Healthcare Individual Mandate Too Weak to Matter, Aetna CEO Says</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House Defends Health Care Law As &#8216;Response to Crisis&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/01/08/230305.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 01:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sherman</dc:creator>				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court health care case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House defense of health care law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=230305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Defending President Barack Obama&#8217;s signature health care overhaul, the administration is urging the Supreme Court to uphold the contentious heart of the law, the requirement that individuals buy insurance or pay a penalty. The administration filed a written submission with &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2012/01/08/230305.htm">White House Defends Health Care Law As &#8216;Response to Crisis&#8217;</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Schedules Obama Healthcare Arguments</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/12/19/228089.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 01:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Vicini</dc:creator>				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court arguments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=228089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Oral arguments on President Barack Obama&#8217;s sweeping U.S. healthcare overhaul will last 5-1/2 hours spread over three days from March 26-28, the Supreme Court said on Monday. The Supreme Court last month agreed to hear the 5-1/2 hours of oral &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/12/19/228089.htm">Supreme Court Schedules Obama Healthcare Arguments</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Part of Mississippi Healthcare Suit Placed on Hold</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/southeast/2011/12/02/225727.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[Southeast News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=225727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge has put on hold portions of a Mississippi lawsuit against Obama administration&#8217;s health care law. U.S. District Judge Keith Starrett, in a ruling issued Nov. 23, stayed consideration of parts of the April 2010 lawsuit not involving &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/southeast/2011/12/02/225727.htm">Part of Mississippi Healthcare Suit Placed on Hold</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to Hear Federal Healthcare Mandate</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/09/27/217526.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Vicini</dc:creator>				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=217526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Obama administration Monday cleared the way for the Supreme Court to decide in its 2011-12 term the president&#8217;s signature healthcare law that requires Americans to buy insurance or face a penalty. A Justice Department spokeswoman said it decided against &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/09/27/217526.htm">Supreme Court to Hear Federal Healthcare Mandate</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Tosses Virginia Challenge to Healthcare Law</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/09/09/214211.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=214211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> A U.S. appeals court handed President Barack Obama a victory for his signature healthcare law Thursday, ruling against challenges by the state of Virginia and others seeking to invalidate the law as unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/09/09/214211.htm">Court Tosses Virginia Challenge to Healthcare Law</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Court Rules Against Obama Healthcare Mandate</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/08/15/210940.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Appeals Court 11th Circuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=210940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama&#8217;s signature healthcare law suffered a setback Friday when a U.S. appeals court ruled that it was unconstitutional to require all Americans to buy insurance or face a penalty. The U.S. Appeals Court for the 11th Circuit, based &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/08/15/210940.htm">U.S. Court Rules Against Obama Healthcare Mandate</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judges Question Individual Mandate in Healthcare Law</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/06/10/202080.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Bluestein</dc:creator>				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constititionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Appeals Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=202080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Three federal appeals judges expressed unease with a requirement that virtually all Americans carry health insurance or face penalties, as they repeatedly raised questions about President Barack Obama&#8217;s health care overhaul. At a Wednesday hearing, the three judges on the &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/06/10/202080.htm">Judges Question Individual Mandate in Healthcare Law</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Appeals Court Hears Arguments Over Healthcare Mandate Today</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/05/10/197779.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 11:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=197779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Lawyers for President Barack Obama go to court Tuesday to try to save the cornerstone of his healthcare overhaul, arguing that the requirement for Americans to buy insurance is constitutional. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/05/10/197779.htm">U.S. Appeals Court Hears Arguments Over Healthcare Mandate Today</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Denies Fast Track for Healthcare Law Challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/04/25/196210.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 01:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Vicini</dc:creator>				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=196210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court refused Monday to speed up a ruling on President Barack Obama&#8217;s healthcare overhaul, his signature domestic achievement that has provoked a fierce political and legal battle. The justices rejected the state of Virginia&#8217;s request to invoke a &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/04/25/196210.htm">Supreme Court Denies Fast Track for Healthcare Law Challenge</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Weighs Bid for Fast-Tracking Healthcare Law Challenges</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/04/15/194741.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=194741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court will likely reject a request to speed up a ruling on President Barack Obama&#8217;s healthcare overhaul law, legal and financial analysts said. The justices Friday are scheduled to consider Virginia&#8217;s request seeking to bypass the normal appeals &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/04/15/194741.htm">Supreme Court Weighs Bid for Fast-Tracking Healthcare Law Challenges</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>9 Alternatives to Individual Health Insurance Mandate; Will They Work?</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/03/29/192080.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew G. Simpson</dc:creator>				<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=192080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are alternatives to the controversial federal government mandate that requires almost everyone to purchase health insurance, although experts are divided over how effective the alternatives might be in helping to expand coverage to the more than 50 million uninsured &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/03/29/192080.htm">9 Alternatives to Individual Health Insurance Mandate; Will They Work?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals Court to Expedite Obama Healthcare Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/03/14/190070.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 09:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=190070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A U.S. Appeals Court agreed Friday to speed up the timetable for the Obama administration&#8217;s appeal of a federal judge&#8217;s ruling that struck down landmark healthcare overhaul law. The Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Atlanta said it &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/03/14/190070.htm">Appeals Court to Expedite Obama Healthcare Appeal</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration Appeals Florida Judge&#8217;s Healthcare Ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/03/08/189501.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 03:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Court of Appeals for 11th Circuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=189501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Obama administration Tuesday appealed a U.S. judge&#8217;s ruling in Florida that struck down its landmark healthcare overhaul law as unconstitutional because it required Americans to buy healthcare insurance or face a penalty. President Barack Obama&#8217;s Justice Department filed its &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/03/08/189501.htm">Obama Administration Appeals Florida Judge&#8217;s Healthcare Ruling</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Federal Judge Dismisses Suit Against Healthcare Mandate</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/02/24/187963.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=187963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge this threw out a lawsuit claiming that President Barack Obama&#8217;s requirement that all Americans have health insurance violates the religious freedom of those who rely on God to protect them. U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler in Washington, &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/02/24/187963.htm">Another Federal Judge Dismisses Suit Against Healthcare Mandate</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Judge in Florida Rules Healthcare Law Must Be Voided</title>
		<link>http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/01/31/182792.htm</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
						<category><![CDATA[National News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconstitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insurancejournal.com/?p=182792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge in Florida struck down President Barack Obama&#8217;s landmark healthcare overhaul as unconstitutional Monday in the biggest legal challenge yet to federal authority to enact the law. U.S. District Judge Roger Vinson ruled that the reform law&#8217;s so-called &#8230;</p><p>The article <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/01/31/182792.htm">Federal Judge in Florida Rules Healthcare Law Must Be Voided</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.insurancejournal.com">Insurance Journal</a>.</p>]]></description>
				</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 5/31 queries in 0.024 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 1834/2171 objects using memcached

 Served from: www.insurancejournal.com @ 2013-05-20 00:51:41 by W3 Total Cache -->