Search found 49 matches
- Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:24 pm
- Forum: Opinions
- Topic: Curious additional insured question
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7272
Re: Curious additional insured question
Keep in mind that I was not asking this so that I can get around our carrier's advices or anything like. More to the point, I simply feel that if the verbiage of the endorsement is taken literally(which is how a court would take it, I hope, if it came to that) that the additional insured endorsement...
- Tue Jun 17, 2008 12:33 pm
- Forum: Hard-to-Place Accounts
- Topic: Coverage for a products failure to perform
- Replies: 14
- Views: 10583
Re: Coverage for a products failure to perform
You might be on the right track; but I would have thought that a warranty is only for replacement of the product? Not a big issue for a $50 or maybe even $250 product(except of course, for the possibility that thousands might be recalled at once)...? Warranty insurance products aren't distributed th...
- Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:21 am
- Forum: Hard-to-Place Accounts
- Topic: Coverage for a products failure to perform
- Replies: 14
- Views: 10583
Re: Coverage for a products failure to perform
Sorry, I meant role not roll. The GL covers BI & PD. There is an exlcusion for your work. I had a client that streched out metal to make it smooth. The mfg who purchased and used the product sued. They alleged that the processing of the metal caused the thickness to be too small and would not b...
- Fri May 30, 2008 11:14 am
- Forum: Opinions
- Topic: Curious additional insured question
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7272
Re: Curious additional insured question
To the best I can tell the CG 0001 form excludes contracts from indemnifying engineers and architects from indemnification for their professional activities, but not ALL indemnification. You may notice if you read the CG 2007 07 04 endorsement for Engineers, Architects and Surveyors, that while it d...
- Fri May 30, 2008 9:07 am
- Forum: Opinions
- Topic: Curious additional insured question
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7272
Re: Curious additional insured question
Personally I wonder if this is an attempt by the carrier to steer you to putting the other endorsement on the policy because the other endorsement happens to have stronger professional liability exclusions, but does that mean if you don't, the original endorsement won't apply? But I guess the ultima...
- Thu May 29, 2008 10:04 am
- Forum: Opinions
- Topic: Curious additional insured question
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7272
Curious additional insured question
I haven't had to deal with this in 4 years(since I've been working with Truckers since that time and not contractors), but I remembered this issue I once had and was wondering if I am right about it - or not. For example- the CG 2010 additional insured endorsement is TITLED "Owners, lesses or c...
- Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:09 am
- Forum: Hard-to-Place Accounts
- Topic: WC in numerous states
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4984
You might just have answered my question - my agency is in NJ so 99% of our customers' out of state exposures are in fact, New York, so I guess I kind of thought that the same thing would apply to work in any state. For example I thought that, say a trucker, whose employees may live and be hired in ...
- Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:41 pm
- Forum: Hard-to-Place Accounts
- Topic: WC in numerous states
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4984
- Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:39 pm
- Forum: Hard-to-Place Accounts
- Topic: Truck Brokerage Authority
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2469
- Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:38 pm
- Forum: Opinions
- Topic: CertificateRequest Forms for Commercial Liability-CA
- Replies: 16
- Views: 14409
- Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:51 am
- Forum: Opinions
- Topic: Adivice needed on a Career Change
- Replies: 29
- Views: 22421
- Thu May 17, 2007 5:47 pm
- Forum: Opinions
- Topic: OCIP / WRAP Certificates
- Replies: 17
- Views: 16515
Auto policies don't have wrap exclusions but if your auto was involved in an accident off-site and the injured party's attorney learned of the job it was coming from, that's one way. For a GL loss though....it's not that easy to come up with an example... but I imagine one possibility is that if a c...
- Mon May 14, 2007 9:16 am
- Forum: Opinions
- Topic: OCIP / WRAP Certificates
- Replies: 17
- Views: 16515
So, if the sub's policy has a wrap-up exclusion that doesn't differentiate between on and off site, and the wrap up might not cover it either, then that's a huge gap isn't it? How would you resolve that gap? I would think you pretty much either have to ask the carrier to manuscript off site coverage...
- Sun May 13, 2007 12:54 pm
- Forum: Opinions
- Topic: OCIP / WRAP Certificates
- Replies: 17
- Views: 16515
- Fri Apr 13, 2007 5:48 pm
- Forum: Opinions
- Topic: For contracting insurance specialist agents
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5152
While I agree that we should tell the client if the additional insured endorsement does or doesn't cover completed operations....except for, say, CG 2037, no endorsement actually comes out and says that it covers completed ops. With that said, the reason that CG 2010 11/85 and similar endorsements d...