Search found 49 matches

by rcenters
Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:24 pm
Forum: Opinions
Topic: Curious additional insured question
Replies: 9
Views: 7272

Re: Curious additional insured question

Keep in mind that I was not asking this so that I can get around our carrier's advices or anything like. More to the point, I simply feel that if the verbiage of the endorsement is taken literally(which is how a court would take it, I hope, if it came to that) that the additional insured endorsement...
by rcenters
Tue Jun 17, 2008 12:33 pm
Forum: Hard-to-Place Accounts
Topic: Coverage for a products failure to perform
Replies: 14
Views: 10583

Re: Coverage for a products failure to perform

You might be on the right track; but I would have thought that a warranty is only for replacement of the product? Not a big issue for a $50 or maybe even $250 product(except of course, for the possibility that thousands might be recalled at once)...? Warranty insurance products aren't distributed th...
by rcenters
Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:21 am
Forum: Hard-to-Place Accounts
Topic: Coverage for a products failure to perform
Replies: 14
Views: 10583

Re: Coverage for a products failure to perform

Sorry, I meant role not roll. The GL covers BI & PD. There is an exlcusion for your work. I had a client that streched out metal to make it smooth. The mfg who purchased and used the product sued. They alleged that the processing of the metal caused the thickness to be too small and would not b...
by rcenters
Fri May 30, 2008 11:14 am
Forum: Opinions
Topic: Curious additional insured question
Replies: 9
Views: 7272

Re: Curious additional insured question

To the best I can tell the CG 0001 form excludes contracts from indemnifying engineers and architects from indemnification for their professional activities, but not ALL indemnification. You may notice if you read the CG 2007 07 04 endorsement for Engineers, Architects and Surveyors, that while it d...
by rcenters
Fri May 30, 2008 9:07 am
Forum: Opinions
Topic: Curious additional insured question
Replies: 9
Views: 7272

Re: Curious additional insured question

Personally I wonder if this is an attempt by the carrier to steer you to putting the other endorsement on the policy because the other endorsement happens to have stronger professional liability exclusions, but does that mean if you don't, the original endorsement won't apply? But I guess the ultima...
by rcenters
Thu May 29, 2008 10:04 am
Forum: Opinions
Topic: Curious additional insured question
Replies: 9
Views: 7272

Curious additional insured question

I haven't had to deal with this in 4 years(since I've been working with Truckers since that time and not contractors), but I remembered this issue I once had and was wondering if I am right about it - or not. For example- the CG 2010 additional insured endorsement is TITLED "Owners, lesses or c...
by rcenters
Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:09 am
Forum: Hard-to-Place Accounts
Topic: WC in numerous states
Replies: 6
Views: 4984

You might just have answered my question - my agency is in NJ so 99% of our customers' out of state exposures are in fact, New York, so I guess I kind of thought that the same thing would apply to work in any state. For example I thought that, say a trucker, whose employees may live and be hired in ...
by rcenters
Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:41 pm
Forum: Hard-to-Place Accounts
Topic: WC in numerous states
Replies: 6
Views: 4984

Big Dog- what do you guys do when they are in fact only domiciled in the one state, from which they purchase the insurance, but they are in the state assigned risk which won't offer "other states" coverage?
by rcenters
Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:39 pm
Forum: Hard-to-Place Accounts
Topic: Truck Brokerage Authority
Replies: 1
Views: 2469

Are you really talking about a truck "broker", or a trucker that utilizes owner operators? Brokers generally place loads with truckers who have their own motor carrier authority, whereas truckers that use owner ops do have motor carrier authority under the carrier's name, and the carrier p...
by rcenters
Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:38 pm
Forum: Opinions
Topic: CertificateRequest Forms for Commercial Liability-CA
Replies: 16
Views: 14409

Does sending a copy of a certificate to a carrier, against their will, that most likely contractually obligates you to issue accurate certificates, does that truly place any of the responsibility back on them?
by rcenters
Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:51 am
Forum: Opinions
Topic: Adivice needed on a Career Change
Replies: 29
Views: 22421

How does one deal with the transition from agency to company underwriting from a standpoint of, well frankly, at an agency you can have the attitude of, "we'll get it done somewhere", and at a company you just have to say no for the smallest of reasons. I personally often think companies a...
by rcenters
Thu May 17, 2007 5:47 pm
Forum: Opinions
Topic: OCIP / WRAP Certificates
Replies: 17
Views: 16515

Auto policies don't have wrap exclusions but if your auto was involved in an accident off-site and the injured party's attorney learned of the job it was coming from, that's one way. For a GL loss though....it's not that easy to come up with an example... but I imagine one possibility is that if a c...
by rcenters
Mon May 14, 2007 9:16 am
Forum: Opinions
Topic: OCIP / WRAP Certificates
Replies: 17
Views: 16515

So, if the sub's policy has a wrap-up exclusion that doesn't differentiate between on and off site, and the wrap up might not cover it either, then that's a huge gap isn't it? How would you resolve that gap? I would think you pretty much either have to ask the carrier to manuscript off site coverage...
by rcenters
Sun May 13, 2007 12:54 pm
Forum: Opinions
Topic: OCIP / WRAP Certificates
Replies: 17
Views: 16515

Do OCIPs usually provide off-site at all?
by rcenters
Fri Apr 13, 2007 5:48 pm
Forum: Opinions
Topic: For contracting insurance specialist agents
Replies: 6
Views: 5152

While I agree that we should tell the client if the additional insured endorsement does or doesn't cover completed operations....except for, say, CG 2037, no endorsement actually comes out and says that it covers completed ops. With that said, the reason that CG 2010 11/85 and similar endorsements d...