Non Compete Insurance?

Leave your comments here on hard to place accounts.

Moderators: Josh, independent guy

Forum rules
Tip: If you are posting a market request, include the state abbreviation in your post title to get better responses.
Post Reply
Playitsafe
Insurance Journal Fan
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:33 am

Non Compete Insurance?

Post by Playitsafe »

I was contacted by one of my clients who said he is in the process of starting a new company along with a couple of partners. One of the partners is currently working with a company in the same industry and has a non-compete clause for six months post employment. He doesn't plan on being actively involved in the new venture until the non-compete expires but they have been told by their lawyer that they should get a insurance policy in case his current employer believes he is violating his non-compete and takes legeal action. The company is located in NJ. Is anyone aware if this coverage exist and if so who offers it?
Thanks!
gforaker
Insurance Journal Addict
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:58 am

Re: Non Compete Insurance?

Post by gforaker »

My understanding is that non-compete contracts are unenforceable almost everywhere. You can have non-piracy or similar contracts with penalties, but you cannot take away a person's occupation. You, or better, he, should contact a local employment law attorney.
jackwehoca
Insurance Journal Addict
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:23 pm

Re: Non Compete Insurance?

Post by jackwehoca »

Most of the time the only enforceable portion of a "non-compete" is the caveat protecting the former employer's "book of business"; that is, you are not allowed to solicit clients that are insured through the former firm. Any client contact must originate from the insured, not the agent.
NYagent301
Insurance Journal Addict
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:31 am

Re: Non Compete Insurance?

Post by NYagent301 »

Not sure exactly what your question is...
"told by their lawyer that they should get a insurance policy in case his current employer believes he is violating his non-compete and takes legeal action"
To me it seems management liability (D&O), but would probably not be covered if there is any knowledge of infomation that may give rise to a claim.
gforaker
Insurance Journal Addict
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:58 am

Re: Non Compete Insurance?

Post by gforaker »

Repeat after me, "Lawyers are not experts in insurance".

What kind of policy would cover an intentional act? Like I said, talk to an employment lawyer.
OldIndyAgent
Insurance Journal Addict
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:07 am

Re: Non Compete Insurance?

Post by OldIndyAgent »

Lawyers are not insurance experts but they are supposed to be contract experts of which, an insurance policy is a contract.

A non-compete may or may not be enforceable depending upon reasonability. It is reasonable to expect that a gas station manager would not take a job at a competing station next door. It is unreasonable to not let them take a job 5 miles away.

Also, accepting compensation ratchets up the enforceability.

gforaker gave good advice, see an employment attorney.
Hirschinsurance
Insurance Journal Fan
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:51 am

Re: Non Compete Insurance?

Post by Hirschinsurance »

I've never heard of any type of insurance coverage that would insure against a non-compete. As to the poster, who said non-competes are almost unenforceable anywhere. That couldn't be any further from the truth. Here in Texas, Texas law favors the employer and non-competes usually hold up, unless that plaintiff can show good cause that's it's limiting the person's ability to make any type of living. There are always exceptions, but non-competes are very commonly upheld under Texas law.
Playitsafe
Insurance Journal Fan
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:33 am

Re: Non Compete Insurance?

Post by Playitsafe »

Thank you all for your impute. From my experience non-competes are inforcable in NJ. After speaking with an underwriter a D&O policy seeems to be the best bet for having something that would respond to a claim by the prior employer. It would not pay if found they were in breach of the non-compete but would pay to defend.
Post Reply