Wisconsin Court Says Insurer Must Defend ‘Junk’ Fax Lawsuit

By | July 23, 2012

A Milwaukee heating and air conditioning company’s insurance provider must defend the business against allegations it sent out an unsolicited “junk” fax in violation of federal law, a state appeals court ruled.

The 1st District Court of Appeals’ decision clears the way for a federal class action lawsuit to continue against Atlas Heating and Sheet Metal Works Inc. and West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. The insurance carrier could find itself on the hook for $1.7 million in damages.

According to the appeals ruling and other court documents, Atlas faxed out a widespread advertisement in December 2005. Isaac Sawyer’s business, A-1 Security Locksmiths, received one of 3,417 faxes, said Sawyer’s attorney, David Oppenheim. Sawyer alleged in federal court in Milwaukee that Atlas violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, a section of federal law that prohibits people from faxing unsolicited advertisements. Each violation is punishable by up to a $500 fine.

Sawyer also contended Atlas damaged his property by consuming paper and toner, caused general wear and tear on his fax machine and violated his privacy rights. The case has been on hold while state judges weigh whether West Bend Mutual must defend Atlas in court.

Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Timothy G. Dugan ruled last year the insurance company did indeed have such a duty. West Bend Mutual appealed. The company argued Atlas’ policy covers violations of individual privacy rights and Sawyer is listed in the lawsuit as doing business as A-1 Security Locksmiths, making the plaintiff a business, not a person. They also maintained the fax didn’t amount to a publication and Atlas’ policy doesn’t apply since sending a fax is a deliberate act, raising questions about whether Atlas intentionally violated the law.

The appeals court voted 2-1 to uphold Dugan’s decision. Presiding Judge Patricia S. Curly wrote for the majority that Sawyer is a person, a term defined in many contexts as a business. The fax did amount to a publication that violated Sawyer’s right to be left alone, a violation of federal law, she added. As for Atlas’ intentions, Curly said even if the company did knowingly violate Sawyer’s rights his allegations allow for the possibility that the move was unintentional. That means West Bend Mutual’s policy applies, she said.

Judge Ralph Adam Fine wrote in dissent that a single-page fax can hardly be construed as an invasion of privacy. The majority opinion essentially means every piece of junk mail could be construed as trespassing, creating a boon for class-action lawyers, he wrote.

West Bend Mutual attorney Jeff Leavell said the company is considering an appeal to the state Supreme Court.

Topics Lawsuits Carriers Wisconsin

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

From This Issue

Insurance Journal Magazine July 23, 2012
July 23, 2012
Insurance Journal Magazine

Excess, Surplus & Specialty Markets Directory Vol. II