Executive Life Judge Confirms Some $900M in Total Verdicts, Settlements

California Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi has praised a Los Angeles Federal judge’s ruling that the Artemis Co., reportedly a main conspirator in the fraudulent purchase of the Executive Life Insurance Co. (ELIC), must pay $190 million plus interest–for a total of at least $250 million–in restitution to victims of the fraud.

The final decision in the case brings the total amount ordered or settled on behalf of defrauded ELIC policyholders to approximately $900 million.

The California Depart-ment of Insurance has long contended that a French consortium–including Artemis–committed fraud to gain control of ELIC and its assets during the early 1990s. The group hid the identity of its controlling interest when it made an application for the ELIC purchase, allowing it to violate California laws regarding foreign ownership of insurance companies. The ruling by Judge Howard Matz of the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles upheld the Commissioner’s position that a fraud was committed.

“I am pleased that the judge has confirmed what I have said all along — that you cannot profit from a fraud,” Garamendi said.

In reaching his ruling, Judge Matz, stated in pertinent part: “Owners and executives of insurance companies, including powerful and sophisticated companies like Artemis … must tell the truth and comply with the law.”

Prior to the ruling the Commissioner had secured settlements in the case with defendants CDR and Aurora. He also won default judgments against MAAF and Jean-Francois Henin. In May, a Los Angeles jury returned a verdict awarding the policyholders $700 million in punitive damages against Artemis. Judge Matz, however, threw out that award in October.

“I am currently considering our appeal options regarding the decision to throw out the jury verdict for punitive damages,” Garamendi said. “But in any case, I am pleased with our work on behalf of policyholders. Every major participant in this fraud has been brought to justice, either through criminal penalties, financial penalties, or both.”

Topics California Fraud Legislation