So how does an insurer, via their adjuster, get away with refusing to test for lead paint while investigating the damages from a covered cause of loss? Both lead paint and asbestos testing are mandatory in nearly every state, but the insurance industry ignores this to lower their loss payment. Maybe Spizer needs to look into this aspect as well?
So how does an insurer, via their adjuster, get away with refusing to test for lead paint while investigating the damages from a covered cause of loss? Both lead paint and asbestos testing are mandatory in nearly every state, but the insurance industry ignores this to lower their loss payment. Maybe Spizer needs to look into this aspect as well?