Wow, an arrest now equals a conviction. Keep that MADD mother cap on sweetie.
I love sheeple that freely give up their freedoms for a vengeful group like the MADD mothers. But Jenn, I’m sure you understand the Bill of Rights and Constitution that MADD has been able to trample all over under the guise of making roads safer.
Understand your propaganda before opining. Otherwise you embarrass yourself.
Another MADD hater speaks. Someone has to speak for the drunks of America. I hope you are never injured or have a loved one killed by a drunk driver. We need to strip these morons of their “right” to drive while impaired.
Since driving is a privilege and not a right, and since the interlocks are only being placed upon multiple convictions, and everybody’s rights are being respected, I don’t see a problem here. I’d like to know what rights the name-changer thinks are being trampled here. These people are still free to move about the country without papers. They still have the full legal use of their property. They were not subjected to illegal search or seizure. So what rights exactly are being trampled?
BAAAA sheep – I don’t think I’ve embarrased myself by thinking that this may saves some lives. Maybe you are someone that sees no problem with multiple DUI offenses but I do. Anyone can make a mistake once but multiple offenses??? If I’ve made an a– of myself for thinking it’s a good idea – so be it. Your opinion means nothing to me.
I’ll drink to that.
I think the ignition interlock program is fabulous for those with more than 2 DUI arrests. Why isn’t it being introduced in more states?
Wow, an arrest now equals a conviction. Keep that MADD mother cap on sweetie.
I love sheeple that freely give up their freedoms for a vengeful group like the MADD mothers. But Jenn, I’m sure you understand the Bill of Rights and Constitution that MADD has been able to trample all over under the guise of making roads safer.
Understand your propaganda before opining. Otherwise you embarrass yourself.
Another MADD hater speaks. Someone has to speak for the drunks of America. I hope you are never injured or have a loved one killed by a drunk driver. We need to strip these morons of their “right” to drive while impaired.
Since when is driving drunk a Constitutional right???
It’s a right if you are a MADD hater.
Hey nobody, Since when is being against MADD or a MADD hater synonymous with being pro drunk driving or pro alcoholic?
Is the issue that black and white?
Since driving is a privilege and not a right, and since the interlocks are only being placed upon multiple convictions, and everybody’s rights are being respected, I don’t see a problem here. I’d like to know what rights the name-changer thinks are being trampled here. These people are still free to move about the country without papers. They still have the full legal use of their property. They were not subjected to illegal search or seizure. So what rights exactly are being trampled?
BAAAA sheep – I don’t think I’ve embarrased myself by thinking that this may saves some lives. Maybe you are someone that sees no problem with multiple DUI offenses but I do. Anyone can make a mistake once but multiple offenses??? If I’ve made an a– of myself for thinking it’s a good idea – so be it. Your opinion means nothing to me.