Texting While Driving Ban Passes Virginia Senate

February 26, 2009

  • February 26, 2009 at 9:48 am
    matt says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    “The bill would not apply to emergency vehicles”

    Glad they put that in there

    Next on the docket: A bill banning shaving your armpits while driving–can you even imagine how dangerous that is? How many children will die if we don’t pass this ban?!?!? HOW MANY CHILDREN?!?!? Do you want THAT on your conscience?!?

  • February 26, 2009 at 10:00 am
    actuary with a lower-case 'a' says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Good job VA! The rest of the states will hopefully follow quickly. I even do it and know it is extremely dangerous. The fines should be a little higher though – texting while driving is more dangerous than speeding attentively, in my opinion.

  • February 26, 2009 at 11:24 am
    DD says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    A 20 fine for someone that is performing an activity while driving that equates to a drunk driver with a BAC > .16

    The texter MIGHT have killed someone and we let them off with a 20 fine?

    Amazing what special interest groups have been able to accomplish against people that MIGHT cause harm but didn’t.

    So is it 1,000 and no jail time IF you actually kill someone while texting?

    What a joke.

  • February 26, 2009 at 12:17 pm
    nobody important says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The joke is those drivers who don’t pay strict attention to their driving. Your convenience and time is so much more important than safety. Get a room!

  • February 26, 2009 at 3:16 am
    DD72 says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Unless you die in the accident with your cold dead hand wrapped around the texting phone…how will anyone prove it??!!??

  • February 27, 2009 at 8:00 am
    Dread says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Until and unless our pathetically impotent legal and political systems attach a perceivable consequence, nothing changes. A $20 fine is laughable, so is a $50 fine for that matter. Want to change behavior and let people know you’re serious? Make the 1st offense a $1,000 fine. If they can’t pay, impound the vehicle for 30-days. That will get the attention of every blockhead out there.

  • February 27, 2009 at 8:54 am
    matt says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    They would subpoena your cell phone log and show that you sent a text message at 3:34:04 pm, and then note that you were involved in a traffic accident at 3:35. That would be enough proof for me.

  • February 27, 2009 at 9:05 am
    actuary says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    More important than the amount of the fine is the fact that it is only a secondary offense – you can’t get pulled over unless you’re speeding, driving erratically or disobeying traffic rules at the same time. They must just be considering texting to be another run-of-the-mill “distracting activity”, like shaving or watching tv or reading a newspaper while driving. Texting is much more dangerous than holding a cellphone up to your ear, and the laws need to reflect that.

  • February 28, 2009 at 10:57 am
    Penny says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Yeah, if you have a wreck they can prove it, but if they are just stopping you for something else they are going to have a really hard time proving it.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*