I’m a little confused over the title of this article. The courts sided with the insurer by declaring that there was no professional relationship between X-Cyte and TransCore, hence no coverage for defense costs. The court did not interpret on the policy including or excluding coverage for Patent Claims.
I’m a little confused over the title of this article. The courts sided with the insurer by declaring that there was no professional relationship between X-Cyte and TransCore, hence no coverage for defense costs. The court did not interpret on the policy including or excluding coverage for Patent Claims.