another case of greed! and now, she probably owing that lawyer more money… so how much of that 220k is going to be her’s? probably only 1/2 if lucky, the lawyer is getting the rest…
At least it was a good decision. How can you hold an employer responsible for the actions of an employee’s child? It is cases like these that scream for Tort Reform. The loser in this case should have to pay ALL legal fees associated with the law suit, for both sides.
another case of greed! and now, she probably owing that lawyer more money… so how much of that 220k is going to be her’s? probably only 1/2 if lucky, the lawyer is getting the rest…
At least it was a good decision. How can you hold an employer responsible for the actions of an employee’s child? It is cases like these that scream for Tort Reform. The loser in this case should have to pay ALL legal fees associated with the law suit, for both sides.
The article really leaves you hanging with “The suit also claimed the girl was unjustifiably arrested and imprisoned.”
Was she arrested and imprisoned? If so, why?