Vermont Court Lets Home Insurer Off the Hook in Pesticide Lawsuit

December 17, 2015

  • December 17, 2015 at 3:25 pm
    steve says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 1
    Thumb down 1

    judges are only lawyers that are wearing funny clothes

    • December 18, 2015 at 9:50 am
      Agent says:
      Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 2
      Thumb down 36

      Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

  • December 18, 2015 at 10:54 am
    Kimb says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 2
    Thumb down 0

    If they received a settlement of $450,000 from the State, I don’t understand why they would make a claim against their insurance carrier?

    • December 18, 2015 at 3:22 pm
      SWFL Agent says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 0
      Thumb down 0

      “because it’s a write-off” – Cosmo Kramer.

  • December 18, 2015 at 12:21 pm
    InsGuy says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 4
    Thumb down 0

    “Let them off the hook.”??

    How about appropriately overturned ruling in favor of policy language?

    Where’s the settlement from the pesticide company’s liability carrier? Even if they contract for the state there should be a policy naming the state as an AI.

  • December 18, 2015 at 1:39 pm
    Stush says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 4
    Thumb down 0

    Ins Guy nailed this and it has nothing to do with Vermont or Bernie Sanders, just plain policy language. Why did they sue anyway if they already made a settlement. If they had an agent, why didn’t he advise that it was excluded in the declarations? Bet plaintiff’s attorney is not happy without a big payday.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*