Homeowners Ask Judge to Rule Against New Jersey in Protective Dune Case By Wayne Parry | February 23, 2016 Email This Subscribe to Newsletter Email to a friend Facebook Tweet LinkedIn Print Article Article 4 Comments February 23, 2016 at 1:50 pm Wild Bill says: Like or Dislike: 8 0Give them what want, to be left alone. If a homeowner objects, let them opt out as long they are also barred from purchasing flood insurance. Sounds like they can absorb the loss anyway. Reply February 23, 2016 at 4:07 pm Rich says: Like or Dislike: 3 0We do not need to subsidize these folks after a storm then…. Reply February 24, 2016 at 9:22 am D says: Like or Dislike: 2 0Let them opt out and bar them from purchasing flood insurance. Don’t fight them. It will save on legal expenses. Reply February 24, 2016 at 5:09 pm Give them time says: Like or Dislike: 0 0Once their homes get washed away, then purchase the “distressed” property through eminent domain. Reply Add a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Name * Email * Comment ΔNotify me of comments via e-mail
Give them what want, to be left alone. If a homeowner objects, let them opt out as long they are also barred from purchasing flood insurance. Sounds like they can absorb the loss anyway.
We do not need to subsidize these folks after a storm then….
Let them opt out and bar them from purchasing flood insurance. Don’t fight them. It will save on legal expenses.
Once their homes get washed away, then purchase the “distressed” property through eminent domain.