Whew, I’m sure all the would-be criminals will stop committing murders and other crimes inside the parks/forests when they know that guns are banned. What a relief!
Correct wayne, The thugs will know that they can rob, murder or do anything else they want if the public cannot defend themselves. Hello Park, here we come.
Hahaha, yes, national parks, America’s next Gangstaland. Get a grip, man!
Coming to a national park near you, Crips vs. Bloods!!!!
December 28, 2016 at 6:42 pm
mrbob says:
Hot debate. What do you think?
14
6
I find it amazing that Delaware’s Constitution, meanwhile, states that a person has the right to keep and bear arms “for the defense of self, family, home and state, and for hunting and recreational use.” But that the DNREC can then violate the right of defense by banning what are nationally the one of the safest and most law abiding group of individuals, concealed carry permit holders, the access with a concealed firearm. The judges argument in support is state agencies have an important governmental objective of keeping the public safe from the potential harm of firearms in parks and forests. How interesting that hunters can possess firearms which they will discharge given an opportunity at game animals, but an individual who only wants to possess a firearm for defense and is very unlikely to have to deploy said weapon is banned. If the State governmental objective of keeping the public safe from the potential harm of firearms in parks and forests is valid, which I feel it is not, then why do they allow hunting which in fact is a privilege but not self-protection which is a natural right of all humans?
Seems illogical at best and more likely that the judge in this case is another anti-gun liberal.
Know where else you can’t have a gun? A Drumpf rally. But, I didn’t hear any of his supporters complaining about that. At least respect yourself enough to be consistent and credible. I mean, how am I going to protect my family against the violence that constantly broke out at his rallies? Black guys getting sucker-punched, peaceful protesters getting thrown to the ground, Muslims being spit on, classy group of supporters there.
You can’t buy a gun without photo ID in most states. Dems like that rule, but can’t come to terms with their hypocrisy on the right of states to demand photo ID to vote.
Most people who buy guns will use them safely. Probably 99%, or more.
It’s guns that are stolen that are used in a hyuuuge majority of violent crimes.
But those who vote ILLEGALLY in states that don’t require photo IDs are usually the greatest threat to do the most harm to the Republic of the USA. Their motivation to vote illegally is largely driven by a Socialist or Communist agenda. That’s a fact, not speculation.
An illegally obtained gun can kill one person, maybe a few. Illegal voting can ‘kill’ an entire Republic over time.
Please adjust the vote totals accordingly, for Iowa.
Let us all know if that changes the eventual result of the election.
also; while you’re at it, please investigate ILLEGAL ALIEN votes and adjust each state’s totals accordingly. Let us know if Hillary still won the ultimately MEANINGLESS popular vote.
The link Planet posted was the investigation of the claim of 3 million undocumented immigrants voting in the election. You’re asking him to do something that was already done, and which he already provided the link for your review. But hey, I’m sure you still think Trump won the popular vote so long as we remove votes from legal citizen who voted in NY & CA.
December 29, 2016 at 5:25 pm
Bob says:
Like or Dislike:
8
2
Planet’s link is seriously flawed. I’ve already seen this before. We will never be able to prove how many people vote illegally, however, we know loopholes exist, and many of these states have counties which have specifically campaigned on loser voting laws. There is no motivation behind that eh?
Some estimates say we have as many as 20 million illegals. If there is an exploit to vote, and we know it exists, you don’t think that 10% of Illegal Mexican would be able to pull off voting? I think it’s naive to think the numbers are as low as politifact tries to say.
I will however say there is no credible study on it, and I’ve asked Agent for them before. It is foolish however to say it isn’t significant. It has to be. People who illegally come here from another state would surely take the easy task of voting to get assistance.
December 29, 2016 at 5:27 pm
Bob says:
Like or Dislike:
5
1
and by that I am implying not the brazen behavior of coming illegally, but the difficulty of the task. People die crossing the border. Lots of them.
They are hard as heck workers. And for some reason you don’t think the will vote…
January 2, 2017 at 6:07 pm
TrumPolarBear says:
Like or Dislike:
4
1
Here’s an easy bit of logic to follow on the illegal alien vote issue:
IF Dems win, Illegal Alien Trespasser Immigrants can stay in the USA.
IF Republicans win, Illegal Alien Trespasser Immigrants will be sent packing back to their homeland.
IF Illegal Alien Trespasser Immigrants can find a way to help Dems win elections, including voting illegally in US elections, they are highly motivated to do so by their self-interests.
Despite the air-tight logic used above, Libitterals will still argue that Illegals won’t vote illegally.
We Conservatives are supposed to be called ‘deplorable’ or ‘reprehensible’ by you Libitterals.
December 31, 2016 at 3:05 pm
Captain Planet says:
Like or Dislike:
1
6
Actually, Hillary only called half of you deplorable. We all know which half you are on, Yogi.
December 31, 2016 at 5:10 pm
Captain Planet says:
Like or Dislike:
1
6
And Drumpf tweets Happy New Year to his “enemies”. He has called some Americans his enemies. I’m sure Yogi and Agent will be consistent and complain about this like they do the “deplorable” comment. I’m so old, I remember
December 31, 2016 at 5:11 pm
Captain Planet says:
Like or Dislike:
1
6
him saying something about how he is going to unite us all? #DividedStatesofAmerica
December 30, 2016 at 10:22 am
Captain Planet says:
Like or Dislike:
0
8
censorship
Know where else you can’t have a gun? A Drumpf rally. But, I didn’t hear any of his supporters complaining about that. At least respect yourself enough to be consistent and credible. I mean, how am I going to protect my family against the violence that constantly broke out at his rallies? Black guys getting sucker-punched, peaceful protesters getting thrown to the ground, Muslims being spit on, classy group of supporters there.
Know where else you can’t have a gun? A Drumpf rally. But, I didn’t hear any of his supporters complaining about that. At least respect yourself enough to be consistent and credible. I mean, how am I going to protect my family against the violence that constantly broke out at his rallies? Black guys getting sucker-punched, peaceful protesters getting thrown to the ground, Muslims being spit on, classy group of supporters there.
I’m not sure why this is an issue. Who in their right mind would bother to ask or even care……not the bad guys. I wouldn’t consider going to a state or national park without a weapon, period. There have been far too many confirmed cases of hikers, robbed/ raped/ murdered over the years for anyone with high cerebral function not to carry.
The only places I don’t carry are places I’d have to go through a metal detector. And because I carry, you’re safer too. You’re welcome.
If I ever take my family to a Drumpf rally with you, will you carry anyhow? I want my underage daughters to be safe from the orange guy with the microphone.
MIJSTRA: Make Insurance Journal Safe To Read, Again.
Petition the powers that be on IJ to set up a comment board with an ‘ignore’ feature to exclude comments by trolls such as CapTroll PlaneTroll. acTrollu, and UW.
If I ever take my family to a Drumpf rally with you, will you carry anyhow? I want my underage daughters to be safe from the orange guy with the microphone.
Scorched Earth Policy Administrator, Sore-Ass Loser, and Soon-to-be-Communist Organizer, Obama is trying desperately to circumvent The US Senate. He is being a hypocrite about the well-established tradition of the incoming POTUS picking the SCOTUS Justice to replace a Justice who leaves in the last year of an incumbent POTUS’s term in office…
Although I am glad that anyone other than Hillary Clinton will be our next POTUS what does all of this rhetoric have to do with the fact that the DNREC is violating individuals right to self defense. I agree with JaxAgent that “I wouldn’t consider going to a state or national park without a weapon, period.” the problem with the logic is that in these anti gun east coast states they put people in prison for not following their weapons laws. So I guess this leaves the law abiding concealed weapons carrier no choice but to avoid parks and forests in the state. A shame that the true owners of the property, the citizens not the state, will be in actuality banned from the enjoyment thereof.
Just because someone you admire says something you like, does not make it true. It just makes it something you like that was said by someone you admire.
Whew, I’m sure all the would-be criminals will stop committing murders and other crimes inside the parks/forests when they know that guns are banned. What a relief!
Correct wayne, The thugs will know that they can rob, murder or do anything else they want if the public cannot defend themselves. Hello Park, here we come.
Hahaha, yes, national parks, America’s next Gangstaland. Get a grip, man!
censorship
Hahaha, yes, national parks, America’s next Gangstaland. Get a grip, man!
Coming to a national park near you, Crips vs. Bloods!!!!
right wing censorship
Hahaha, yes, national parks, America’s next Gangstaland. Get a grip, man!
Coming to a national park near you, Crips vs. Bloods!!!!
I find it amazing that Delaware’s Constitution, meanwhile, states that a person has the right to keep and bear arms “for the defense of self, family, home and state, and for hunting and recreational use.” But that the DNREC can then violate the right of defense by banning what are nationally the one of the safest and most law abiding group of individuals, concealed carry permit holders, the access with a concealed firearm. The judges argument in support is state agencies have an important governmental objective of keeping the public safe from the potential harm of firearms in parks and forests. How interesting that hunters can possess firearms which they will discharge given an opportunity at game animals, but an individual who only wants to possess a firearm for defense and is very unlikely to have to deploy said weapon is banned. If the State governmental objective of keeping the public safe from the potential harm of firearms in parks and forests is valid, which I feel it is not, then why do they allow hunting which in fact is a privilege but not self-protection which is a natural right of all humans?
Seems illogical at best and more likely that the judge in this case is another anti-gun liberal.
Know where else you can’t have a gun? A Drumpf rally. But, I didn’t hear any of his supporters complaining about that. At least respect yourself enough to be consistent and credible. I mean, how am I going to protect my family against the violence that constantly broke out at his rallies? Black guys getting sucker-punched, peaceful protesters getting thrown to the ground, Muslims being spit on, classy group of supporters there.
What’s a Drumpf rally?
You can’t buy a gun without photo ID in most states. Dems like that rule, but can’t come to terms with their hypocrisy on the right of states to demand photo ID to vote.
Most people who buy guns will use them safely. Probably 99%, or more.
It’s guns that are stolen that are used in a hyuuuge majority of violent crimes.
But those who vote ILLEGALLY in states that don’t require photo IDs are usually the greatest threat to do the most harm to the Republic of the USA. Their motivation to vote illegally is largely driven by a Socialist or Communist agenda. That’s a fact, not speculation.
An illegally obtained gun can kill one person, maybe a few. Illegal voting can ‘kill’ an entire Republic over time.
Sorry, a President-Elect Kiddie Porn Watching Perverted Incest-Curious Alleged Child Raping Dumb Donnie Tic Tacs and his sexually deranged carnival digits “Spike the Football” rally.
Illegal voting? Facts don’t fit the narrative, not a surprise.
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2016/nov/18/blog-posting/no-3-million-undocumented-immigrants-did-not-vote-/
Someone did get busted here in Iowa for voter fraud, voting for the orange guy twice. Maybe he’s right, maybe it was rigged.
Please adjust the vote totals accordingly, for Iowa.
Let us all know if that changes the eventual result of the election.
also; while you’re at it, please investigate ILLEGAL ALIEN votes and adjust each state’s totals accordingly. Let us know if Hillary still won the ultimately MEANINGLESS popular vote.
The link Planet posted was the investigation of the claim of 3 million undocumented immigrants voting in the election. You’re asking him to do something that was already done, and which he already provided the link for your review. But hey, I’m sure you still think Trump won the popular vote so long as we remove votes from legal citizen who voted in NY & CA.
Planet’s link is seriously flawed. I’ve already seen this before. We will never be able to prove how many people vote illegally, however, we know loopholes exist, and many of these states have counties which have specifically campaigned on loser voting laws. There is no motivation behind that eh?
Some estimates say we have as many as 20 million illegals. If there is an exploit to vote, and we know it exists, you don’t think that 10% of Illegal Mexican would be able to pull off voting? I think it’s naive to think the numbers are as low as politifact tries to say.
I will however say there is no credible study on it, and I’ve asked Agent for them before. It is foolish however to say it isn’t significant. It has to be. People who illegally come here from another state would surely take the easy task of voting to get assistance.
and by that I am implying not the brazen behavior of coming illegally, but the difficulty of the task. People die crossing the border. Lots of them.
They are hard as heck workers. And for some reason you don’t think the will vote…
Here’s an easy bit of logic to follow on the illegal alien vote issue:
IF Dems win, Illegal Alien Trespasser Immigrants can stay in the USA.
IF Republicans win, Illegal Alien Trespasser Immigrants will be sent packing back to their homeland.
IF Illegal Alien Trespasser Immigrants can find a way to help Dems win elections, including voting illegally in US elections, they are highly motivated to do so by their self-interests.
Despite the air-tight logic used above, Libitterals will still argue that Illegals won’t vote illegally.
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
There is no such POTUS-elect in existence, so your statement is moot.
right wing censorship
Sorry, a President-Elect Kiddie Porn Watching Perverted Incest-Curious Alleged Child Raping Dumb Donnie Tic Tacs and his sexually deranged carnival digits “Spike the Football” rally.
Illegal voting? Facts don’t fit the narrative, not a surprise.
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2016/nov/18/blog-posting/no-3-million-undocumented-immigrants-did-not-vote-/
Someone did get busted here in Iowa for voter fraud, voting for the orange guy twice. Maybe he’s right, maybe it was rigged.
Where are all the bitter liberal commenters? (aka ‘libitterals’)
They don’t like guns, but are very fast to shoot off their mouths on political issues.
repbitterals–like you perhaps. Shallow.
No, no, no! You got it wrong.
We Conservatives are supposed to be called ‘deplorable’ or ‘reprehensible’ by you Libitterals.
Actually, Hillary only called half of you deplorable. We all know which half you are on, Yogi.
And Drumpf tweets Happy New Year to his “enemies”. He has called some Americans his enemies. I’m sure Yogi and Agent will be consistent and complain about this like they do the “deplorable” comment. I’m so old, I remember
him saying something about how he is going to unite us all? #DividedStatesofAmerica
censorship
Know where else you can’t have a gun? A Drumpf rally. But, I didn’t hear any of his supporters complaining about that. At least respect yourself enough to be consistent and credible. I mean, how am I going to protect my family against the violence that constantly broke out at his rallies? Black guys getting sucker-punched, peaceful protesters getting thrown to the ground, Muslims being spit on, classy group of supporters there.
right wing censorship
Know where else you can’t have a gun? A Drumpf rally. But, I didn’t hear any of his supporters complaining about that. At least respect yourself enough to be consistent and credible. I mean, how am I going to protect my family against the violence that constantly broke out at his rallies? Black guys getting sucker-punched, peaceful protesters getting thrown to the ground, Muslims being spit on, classy group of supporters there.
MAPSA: Make American Parks Safe Again!
If I ever visit Delaware, I’ll avoid hiking in their parks.
I’m not sure why this is an issue. Who in their right mind would bother to ask or even care……not the bad guys. I wouldn’t consider going to a state or national park without a weapon, period. There have been far too many confirmed cases of hikers, robbed/ raped/ murdered over the years for anyone with high cerebral function not to carry.
The only places I don’t carry are places I’d have to go through a metal detector. And because I carry, you’re safer too. You’re welcome.
If I ever take my family to a Drumpf rally with you, will you carry anyhow? I want my underage daughters to be safe from the orange guy with the microphone.
MPEKPWPICACRDDTTAHSDCDSTFRSA: Make President-Elect Kiddie Porn Watching Perverted Incest-Curious Alleged Child Raping Dumb Donnie Tic Tacs and His Sexually Deranged Carnival Digits “Spike The Football” Rallies Safe Again!
MIJSTRA: Make Insurance Journal Safe To Read, Again.
Petition the powers that be on IJ to set up a comment board with an ‘ignore’ feature to exclude comments by trolls such as CapTroll PlaneTroll. acTrollu, and UW.
You can try to censor all you want. I know you only like certain parts of The Constitution. Oh, and The Bible, too.
I’m NOT trying to censor your comments from the readers.
I’m trying to ignore your useless, trolling comments…. and give other readers that OPTION, too!
If you want to ignore me, just quit reading what I write. I’ve been ignoring Bob out here for years. It’s pretty easy.
censorship
MPEKPWPICACRDDTTAHSDCDSTFRSA: Make President-Elect Kiddie Porn Watching Perverted Incest-Curious Alleged Child Raping Dumb Donnie Tic Tacs and His Sexually Deranged Carnival Digits “Spike The Football” Rallies Safe Again!
censorship
If I ever take my family to a Drumpf rally with you, will you carry anyhow? I want my underage daughters to be safe from the orange guy with the microphone.
17 more days until the Failure-in-Chief leaves and our LONG NATIONAL NIGHTMARE ends.
Scorched Earth Policy Administrator, Sore-Ass Loser, and Soon-to-be-Communist Organizer, Obama is trying desperately to circumvent The US Senate. He is being a hypocrite about the well-established tradition of the incoming POTUS picking the SCOTUS Justice to replace a Justice who leaves in the last year of an incumbent POTUS’s term in office…
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/03/last-chance-for-obama-to-sneak-in-garland-to-high-court-is-unlikely.html
Although I am glad that anyone other than Hillary Clinton will be our next POTUS what does all of this rhetoric have to do with the fact that the DNREC is violating individuals right to self defense. I agree with JaxAgent that “I wouldn’t consider going to a state or national park without a weapon, period.” the problem with the logic is that in these anti gun east coast states they put people in prison for not following their weapons laws. So I guess this leaves the law abiding concealed weapons carrier no choice but to avoid parks and forests in the state. A shame that the true owners of the property, the citizens not the state, will be in actuality banned from the enjoyment thereof.
In reading what this judge ruled and now in reading some of these comments, it reminds me of a great quote.
“The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn’t so.” Ronald Reagan.
Just because someone you admire says something you like, does not make it true. It just makes it something you like that was said by someone you admire.
We can definitely agree on that Ron.
I may use your line for a quote next time.